Role of a Designated Pharmacist in Reducing Adverse Drug Reaction Rates and Preventing Potential Medication Errors in Hematology-Oncology: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Areen Khateeb Alabbasi, Manfred S Green, Shuli Brammli-Greenberg, Mouna Ballan Haj, Meir Preis, Naama Schwartz, Ophir Lavon, Shmuel Klang, Shai Cohen
{"title":"Role of a Designated Pharmacist in Reducing Adverse Drug Reaction Rates and Preventing Potential Medication Errors in Hematology-Oncology: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Areen Khateeb Alabbasi, Manfred S Green, Shuli Brammli-Greenberg, Mouna Ballan Haj, Meir Preis, Naama Schwartz, Ophir Lavon, Shmuel Klang, Shai Cohen","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evidence is insufficient regarding pharmacists' impact on reducing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in oncology. This trial evaluated whether including a designated pharmacist in the hematology-oncology team reduced ADRs compared with standard care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted at its outpatient hematology-oncology clinics from July 2020 to October 2022. All consecutive patients meeting study criteria were randomly assigned to receive comprehensive pharmacist intervention or standard care in a 1:1 ratio. Outcomes were monitored over the 4-month intervention period and 1 month afterward. In the intervention group, the pharmacist evaluated treatments, provided medication counseling, and made recommendations to physicians. The control group's treatment charts were evaluated after the intervention ended. In both groups, unrelated pharmacologist physicians determined which recommendations were medication errors (MEs) and assessed their severity levels. The primary outcome was the rates of ADRs. The analysis used the intention-to-treat principle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 182 patients, 91 in each group. The intervention group had lower ADR rates, with an age-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.65; <i>P</i> < .001) for at least one ADR and an aHR of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67; <i>P</i> = .006) for at least one moderate or severe ADR. The pharmacist made 588 recommendations for the intervention group, 95% of which were implemented, and identified 287 as MEs. The intervention group also had a higher incidence of detected administration errors (incidence rate ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.38 to 4.92; <i>P</i> = .003) and a higher proportion of potentially serious MEs (<i>P</i> = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating an oncology pharmacist into hematology-oncology clinics reduces ADRs and improves the detection and prevention of potentially serious MEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500158"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence is insufficient regarding pharmacists' impact on reducing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in oncology. This trial evaluated whether including a designated pharmacist in the hematology-oncology team reduced ADRs compared with standard care.

Methods: This single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted at its outpatient hematology-oncology clinics from July 2020 to October 2022. All consecutive patients meeting study criteria were randomly assigned to receive comprehensive pharmacist intervention or standard care in a 1:1 ratio. Outcomes were monitored over the 4-month intervention period and 1 month afterward. In the intervention group, the pharmacist evaluated treatments, provided medication counseling, and made recommendations to physicians. The control group's treatment charts were evaluated after the intervention ended. In both groups, unrelated pharmacologist physicians determined which recommendations were medication errors (MEs) and assessed their severity levels. The primary outcome was the rates of ADRs. The analysis used the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: The study included 182 patients, 91 in each group. The intervention group had lower ADR rates, with an age-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.65; P < .001) for at least one ADR and an aHR of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67; P = .006) for at least one moderate or severe ADR. The pharmacist made 588 recommendations for the intervention group, 95% of which were implemented, and identified 287 as MEs. The intervention group also had a higher incidence of detected administration errors (incidence rate ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.38 to 4.92; P = .003) and a higher proportion of potentially serious MEs (P = .003).

Conclusion: Integrating an oncology pharmacist into hematology-oncology clinics reduces ADRs and improves the detection and prevention of potentially serious MEs.

一项随机对照试验:指定药师在降低血液肿瘤学药物不良反应率和预防潜在用药错误中的作用。
目的:关于药师在减少肿瘤药物不良反应(adr)方面的作用,证据不足。该试验评估了与标准治疗相比,在血液肿瘤学团队中加入一名指定药剂师是否能减少不良反应。方法:该单中心随机临床试验于2020年7月至2022年10月在其血液肿瘤门诊进行。所有符合研究标准的连续患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受综合药剂师干预或标准治疗。在4个月的干预期和干预后1个月监测结果。在干预组,药剂师评估治疗,提供药物咨询,并向医生提出建议。干预结束后,对对照组的治疗图表进行评估。在两组中,不相关的药理学家医生确定哪些建议是用药错误(MEs)并评估其严重程度。主要结果是adr的发生率。该分析使用了意向治疗原则。结果:纳入182例患者,每组91例。干预组不良反应发生率较低,年龄校正风险比(aHR)为0.38 (95% CI, 0.23 ~ 0.65;P < 0.001), aHR为0.25 (95% CI, 0.09 ~ 0.67;P = .006),至少一例中度或重度不良反应。药师对干预组提出588条建议,95%得到实施,其中287条为MEs。干预组检测到的给药错误发生率也较高(发生率比,2.61;95% CI, 1.38 ~ 4.92;P = 0.003),潜在严重MEs的比例更高(P = 0.003)。结论:将肿瘤药师纳入血液学肿瘤学临床可减少不良反应,提高潜在严重MEs的发现和预防水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信