Effect of intraoperative music intervention on anxiety and pain control in patients undergoing kidney surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yan Lou, Shuang Xu, Panpan Gao
{"title":"Effect of intraoperative music intervention on anxiety and pain control in patients undergoing kidney surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yan Lou, Shuang Xu, Panpan Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the first systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) for the effect of intraoperative music intervention on anxiety and pain control in patients undergoing kidney surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane up to November 2024. Outcomes included visual analog score (VAS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for data pooling of continuous variables. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the results. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that patients in the music intervention group had significantly lower postoperative VAS (SMD: -0.65; 95% CI: -0.93, -0.38; P<0.00001) and STAI scores (SMD: -0.48; 95% CI: -0.71, -0.26; P<0.0001) compared to those in the control group. Significant heterogeneity was observed for both outcomes. In addition, sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of both outcomes, but VAS was found to have significant publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Music intervention can significantly reduce the postoperative VAS and STAI of patients undergoing renal surgery, and effectively control the anxiety and pain caused by surgery. Considering the potential heterogeneity, publication bias, and low regional selection bias in this study, more large-sample, multicenter RCTs are needed in the future to further confirm the effect of music intervention on pain and anxiety relief in individuals undergoing renal surgery and potential influencing factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"103221"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To report the first systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) for the effect of intraoperative music intervention on anxiety and pain control in patients undergoing kidney surgery.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane up to November 2024. Outcomes included visual analog score (VAS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for data pooling of continuous variables. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the results. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.1.

Results: The meta-analysis revealed that patients in the music intervention group had significantly lower postoperative VAS (SMD: -0.65; 95% CI: -0.93, -0.38; P<0.00001) and STAI scores (SMD: -0.48; 95% CI: -0.71, -0.26; P<0.0001) compared to those in the control group. Significant heterogeneity was observed for both outcomes. In addition, sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of both outcomes, but VAS was found to have significant publication bias.

Conclusions: Music intervention can significantly reduce the postoperative VAS and STAI of patients undergoing renal surgery, and effectively control the anxiety and pain caused by surgery. Considering the potential heterogeneity, publication bias, and low regional selection bias in this study, more large-sample, multicenter RCTs are needed in the future to further confirm the effect of music intervention on pain and anxiety relief in individuals undergoing renal surgery and potential influencing factors.

术中音乐干预对肾脏手术患者焦虑和疼痛控制的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:首次对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨术中音乐干预对肾脏手术患者焦虑和疼痛控制的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane的文献,检索截止到2024年11月。结果包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)。采用标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)对连续变量进行数据池化。此外,进行敏感性分析以评估结果的稳定性。所有分析均使用Review Manager 5.4和STATA 15.1进行。结果:meta分析显示,音乐干预组患者术后VAS显著降低(SMD: -0.65;95% ci: -0.93, -0.38;P<0.00001)和STAI评分(SMD: -0.48;95% ci: -0.71, -0.26;P<0.0001)。两种结果均观察到显著的异质性。此外,敏感性分析证实了两种结果的稳定性,但发现VAS存在显著的发表偏倚。结论:音乐干预可显著降低肾脏手术患者术后VAS和STAI,有效控制手术引起的焦虑和疼痛。考虑到本研究存在潜在的异质性、发表偏倚和较低的区域选择偏倚,未来需要更多的大样本、多中心随机对照试验来进一步证实音乐干预对肾脏手术患者疼痛和焦虑缓解的作用及其潜在的影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信