Mapping evidence of spinal manipulation therapy for headaches in South Africa: a scoping review of grey literature.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Keseri Padayachy, Ismail Fatima, Morris Kahere, Alister du Rose, Katherine A Pohlman
{"title":"Mapping evidence of spinal manipulation therapy for headaches in South Africa: a scoping review of grey literature.","authors":"Keseri Padayachy, Ismail Fatima, Morris Kahere, Alister du Rose, Katherine A Pohlman","doi":"10.1186/s12906-025-05044-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been demonstrated to be an effective management approach for primary headaches; however, current literature often excludes data from South Africa (SA). The use of grey literature provides a viable mechanism to address knowledge gaps. Understanding that Master's dissertations are a source of grey literature, this review's primary objective was to address the following question: What is the range of evidence, particularly regarding subjective and objective outcome measures, for the application of SMT in managing headache patients at chiropractic training facilities in SA?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review methodology was adopted in compliance with the Joana-Briggs-Institute and the Arksey and O'Malley frameworks and reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis extended for scoping reviews checklist. The search was performed using the Durban University of Technology and University of Johannesburg Research Databases. All studies conducted from 1995 to May 2023 were retrieved. Trials conducted with SMT for the management of headaches were included and subjective (i.e., numerical rating scale, headache disability index, neck disability index) and objective (i.e., range of motions, pressure algometry) outcomes were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 25 dissertations with 921 headache patients were reviewed. Across most of the dissertations, combining SMT with additional modalities versus SMT alone or another modality alone yielded greater improvement in subjective outcome measures, although there were occasional exceptions where no clear pattern emerged. In terms of objective measures, there were both increases and decreases across the different interventions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings align with existing literature, indicating that primary headache patients in SA who receive SMT in conjunction with other non-pharmacological treatments respond favourably. This study underscores the potential value of grey literature, particularly in regions where high-quality data is scarce. It highlights the significance of SMT for policymakers, funders, and other stakeholders involved in managing headache patients in SA. Although limitations related to the quality of the dataset are acknowledged, the standardization and robust design of clinical trial protocols at SA institutions reveal numerous strengths. Despite ongoing discussions in the literature regarding the use of SMT for headache management, there is a strong case for existing literature to be used in the SA context.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"25 1","pages":"294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-05044-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been demonstrated to be an effective management approach for primary headaches; however, current literature often excludes data from South Africa (SA). The use of grey literature provides a viable mechanism to address knowledge gaps. Understanding that Master's dissertations are a source of grey literature, this review's primary objective was to address the following question: What is the range of evidence, particularly regarding subjective and objective outcome measures, for the application of SMT in managing headache patients at chiropractic training facilities in SA?

Methods: A scoping review methodology was adopted in compliance with the Joana-Briggs-Institute and the Arksey and O'Malley frameworks and reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis extended for scoping reviews checklist. The search was performed using the Durban University of Technology and University of Johannesburg Research Databases. All studies conducted from 1995 to May 2023 were retrieved. Trials conducted with SMT for the management of headaches were included and subjective (i.e., numerical rating scale, headache disability index, neck disability index) and objective (i.e., range of motions, pressure algometry) outcomes were extracted.

Results: In total 25 dissertations with 921 headache patients were reviewed. Across most of the dissertations, combining SMT with additional modalities versus SMT alone or another modality alone yielded greater improvement in subjective outcome measures, although there were occasional exceptions where no clear pattern emerged. In terms of objective measures, there were both increases and decreases across the different interventions.

Discussion: The findings align with existing literature, indicating that primary headache patients in SA who receive SMT in conjunction with other non-pharmacological treatments respond favourably. This study underscores the potential value of grey literature, particularly in regions where high-quality data is scarce. It highlights the significance of SMT for policymakers, funders, and other stakeholders involved in managing headache patients in SA. Although limitations related to the quality of the dataset are acknowledged, the standardization and robust design of clinical trial protocols at SA institutions reveal numerous strengths. Despite ongoing discussions in the literature regarding the use of SMT for headache management, there is a strong case for existing literature to be used in the SA context.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

绘制证据的脊柱推拿治疗头痛在南非:灰色文献的范围审查。
目的:脊柱推拿疗法(SMT)已被证明是治疗原发性头痛的有效方法;然而,目前的文献经常排除来自南非(SA)的数据。灰色文献的使用为解决知识差距提供了一种可行的机制。了解到硕士论文是灰色文献的来源,本综述的主要目的是解决以下问题:在南澳大利亚州脊骨按摩训练机构应用SMT治疗头痛患者的证据范围是什么,特别是关于主观和客观的结果测量?方法:采用Joana-Briggs-Institute和Arksey和O'Malley框架的范围审查方法,并按照系统审查和扩展范围审查清单的元分析的首选报告项目进行报告。搜索使用德班科技大学和约翰内斯堡大学的研究数据库进行。检索1995年至2023年5月进行的所有研究。纳入了使用SMT治疗头痛的试验,并提取了主观(即数值评定量表、头痛残疾指数、颈部残疾指数)和客观(即活动范围、压力测量)结果。结果:共回顾了25篇论文921例头痛患者。在大多数论文中,与单独使用SMT或单独使用另一种模式相比,将SMT与其他模式相结合在主观结果测量中产生了更大的改善,尽管偶尔也有例外,没有明确的模式出现。就客观测量而言,在不同的干预措施中既有增加也有减少。讨论:研究结果与现有文献一致,表明SA的原发性头痛患者接受SMT联合其他非药物治疗效果良好。这项研究强调了灰色文献的潜在价值,特别是在高质量数据稀缺的地区。它强调了SMT对政策制定者、资助者和其他参与管理南南非头痛患者的利益相关者的重要性。尽管与数据集质量相关的局限性得到承认,但SA机构临床试验方案的标准化和稳健设计显示出许多优势。尽管文献中关于使用SMT治疗头痛的讨论正在进行中,但有一个强有力的案例表明,现有文献可以在SA的背景下使用。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信