Evaluation of the Neutrophil-Based Inflammatory Indexes SIRI and NHR in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy.
Yu Shao, Xinyi Han, Huihao Yu, Jing Liu, Xiaojing Wang, Yan Yang
{"title":"Evaluation of the Neutrophil-Based Inflammatory Indexes SIRI and NHR in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy.","authors":"Yu Shao, Xinyi Han, Huihao Yu, Jing Liu, Xiaojing Wang, Yan Yang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the predictive value of two neutrophil-based inflammatory indexes - the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and the neutrophil-to-high density lipoprotein ratio (NHR) - in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2020 to May 2023, we enrolled 101 ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line ICIs and chemotherapy in this study. Clinicopathological features, haematological indicators including the SIRI and NHR, treatment efficacy, and patient outcome data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy or outcome among enrolled patients receiving programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. The baseline SIRI (<i>P</i>=0.136) and NHR (<i>P</i>=0.453) did not perform well in predicting treatment response. The serum SIRI before treatment was not significantly different from that after two treatment cycles (<i>P</i>=0.113). After two treatment cycles, the serum NHR exhibited a significant decrease from its pretreatment value (<i>P</i>=0.004). The dynamics of the serum SIRI and NHR before therapy and at disease progression did not significantly differ (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) of patients were significantly longer in the high-SIRI group than in the low-SIRI group (mPFS: 7.033 vs. 5.900 months, <i>P</i>=0.020; mOS: 16.233 vs. 11.200 months, <i>P</i>=0.012). Moreover, patients in the low-NHR subgroup presented significantly longer mPFS and mOS than did those in the high-NHR subgroup (mPFS: 7.033 vs. 4.900 months, <i>P</i>=0.002; mOS: 13.933 vs. 8.500 months, <i>P</i>=0.006). Finally, multivariate analyses revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, the pretreatment serum SIRI, and the pretreatment serum NHR (all <i>P</i><0.050) can serve as valuable independent predictors for PFS and OS in patients with ES-SCLC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The baseline serum SIRI and NHR can serve as promising indicators of prognosis, but not treatment response, in ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line ICIs and chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","volume":"55 3","pages":"354-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the predictive value of two neutrophil-based inflammatory indexes - the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and the neutrophil-to-high density lipoprotein ratio (NHR) - in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy.
Methods: From May 2020 to May 2023, we enrolled 101 ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line ICIs and chemotherapy in this study. Clinicopathological features, haematological indicators including the SIRI and NHR, treatment efficacy, and patient outcome data were analyzed.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy or outcome among enrolled patients receiving programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. The baseline SIRI (P=0.136) and NHR (P=0.453) did not perform well in predicting treatment response. The serum SIRI before treatment was not significantly different from that after two treatment cycles (P=0.113). After two treatment cycles, the serum NHR exhibited a significant decrease from its pretreatment value (P=0.004). The dynamics of the serum SIRI and NHR before therapy and at disease progression did not significantly differ (all P>0.05). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) of patients were significantly longer in the high-SIRI group than in the low-SIRI group (mPFS: 7.033 vs. 5.900 months, P=0.020; mOS: 16.233 vs. 11.200 months, P=0.012). Moreover, patients in the low-NHR subgroup presented significantly longer mPFS and mOS than did those in the high-NHR subgroup (mPFS: 7.033 vs. 4.900 months, P=0.002; mOS: 13.933 vs. 8.500 months, P=0.006). Finally, multivariate analyses revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, the pretreatment serum SIRI, and the pretreatment serum NHR (all P<0.050) can serve as valuable independent predictors for PFS and OS in patients with ES-SCLC.
Conclusions: The baseline serum SIRI and NHR can serve as promising indicators of prognosis, but not treatment response, in ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line ICIs and chemotherapy.
目的:探讨两种基于中性粒细胞的炎症指标——全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和中性粒细胞与高密度脂蛋白比值(NHR)在接受一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和化疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者中的预测价值。方法:从2020年5月到2023年5月,我们在这项研究中招募了101例接受一线ICIs和化疗的ES-SCLC患者。分析临床病理特征、血液学指标(SIRI、NHR)、治疗效果及患者转归资料。结果:在接受程序性细胞死亡蛋白1 (PD-1)或程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)抑制剂的入组患者中,疗效或结局无统计学差异。基线SIRI (P=0.136)和NHR (P=0.453)在预测治疗反应方面表现不佳。治疗前与两个治疗周期后血清SIRI差异无统计学意义(P=0.113)。两个治疗周期后,血清NHR较治疗前显著降低(P=0.004)。治疗前和疾病进展时血清SIRI和NHR的动态变化无显著差异(均P < 0.05)。高siri组患者的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和中位总生存期(mOS)明显长于低siri组(mPFS: 7.033 vs 5.900个月,P=0.020;mOS: 16.233 vs. 11.200个月,P=0.012)。此外,低nhr亚组患者的mPFS和mOS明显长于高nhr亚组(mPFS: 7.033 vs 4.900个月,P=0.002;mOS: 13.933 vs. 8.500个月,P=0.006)。结论:基线血清SIRI和NHR可以作为ES-SCLC患者接受一线ICIs和化疗的预后指标,但不能作为治疗反应的指标。
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science
welcomes manuscripts that report research in clinical
science, including pathology, clinical chemistry,
biotechnology, molecular biology, cytogenetics,
microbiology, immunology, hematology, transfusion
medicine, organ and tissue transplantation, therapeutics, toxicology, and clinical informatics.