The diagnostic performance of shear-wave elastography combined with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in breast lesions: A single center retrospective study.
{"title":"The diagnostic performance of shear-wave elastography combined with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in breast lesions: A single center retrospective study.","authors":"Wen-Yan Zhou, Lian-Lian Zhang, Xiao Zhou, Xian-Bin Pan, Long-Xiu Qi","doi":"10.17219/acem/203584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer remains a major healthcare challenge, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis. Shear-wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasound-based imaging technique that quantifies tissue elasticity, has emerged as a promising tool. Recent studies suggest that SWE may provide additional diagnostic value when used alongside conventional imaging methods.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of SWE when combined with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with breast lesions who underwent SWE, conventional ultrasound and MRI. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated individually and in combination. Histopathological results served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Key performance metrics - sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy - were calculated for each imaging approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 99 patients were included in the study, comprising 64 with benign lesions and 35 with malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were generally larger and exhibited distinct imaging characteristics across ultrasound, SWE and MRI. When assessed individually, SWE, ultrasound and MRI showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (64.6%, 62.6% and 62.6%, respectively). However, combining all 3 modalities significantly improved diagnostic performance, yielding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of 94.3%, 89.1%, 82.5%, 96.6%, and 90.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined approach was significantly higher than for any single modality (0.917 vs 0.642, 0.627 and 0.633; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While SWE alone offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of ultrasound and MRI individually, its greatest value lies in combination with these imaging modalities. Integrating ultrasound, SWE and MRI significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, offering a promising multimodal approach for more reliable differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/203584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer remains a major healthcare challenge, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis. Shear-wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasound-based imaging technique that quantifies tissue elasticity, has emerged as a promising tool. Recent studies suggest that SWE may provide additional diagnostic value when used alongside conventional imaging methods.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of SWE when combined with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of breast lesions.
Material and methods: This retrospective study included patients with breast lesions who underwent SWE, conventional ultrasound and MRI. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated individually and in combination. Histopathological results served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Key performance metrics - sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy - were calculated for each imaging approach.
Results: A total of 99 patients were included in the study, comprising 64 with benign lesions and 35 with malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were generally larger and exhibited distinct imaging characteristics across ultrasound, SWE and MRI. When assessed individually, SWE, ultrasound and MRI showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (64.6%, 62.6% and 62.6%, respectively). However, combining all 3 modalities significantly improved diagnostic performance, yielding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of 94.3%, 89.1%, 82.5%, 96.6%, and 90.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined approach was significantly higher than for any single modality (0.917 vs 0.642, 0.627 and 0.633; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: While SWE alone offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of ultrasound and MRI individually, its greatest value lies in combination with these imaging modalities. Integrating ultrasound, SWE and MRI significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, offering a promising multimodal approach for more reliable differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly.
Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff.
Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj.
Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker.
The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus.
Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.