Ecosystem and disaster risk: A review of ecological indicators in the context of disaster risk assessments and discussion of their usefulness to inform ecosystem health

S. Janzen , L. Narvaez , A. Ortiz-Vargas , J. O‘Connor , Y. Walz , Z. Sebesvari
{"title":"Ecosystem and disaster risk: A review of ecological indicators in the context of disaster risk assessments and discussion of their usefulness to inform ecosystem health","authors":"S. Janzen ,&nbsp;L. Narvaez ,&nbsp;A. Ortiz-Vargas ,&nbsp;J. O‘Connor ,&nbsp;Y. Walz ,&nbsp;Z. Sebesvari","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecosystems play a critical role in reducing disaster risk by providing ecosystem services (ESS) that influence all components of risk. The capacity to deliver ESS depends on the health of the ecosystem itself. Thus, it is key to consider ecosystem health in risk assessments for a comprehensive understanding of disaster risk and effective disaster risk management. The paper reviews ecosystem-related indicators used in disaster risk or vulnerability assessments to better understand how, and to what degree, ecosystems and their health are currently considered in indicator-based assessments relating to flood, drought and storms. Of 231 reviewed papers just under half recognise ecosystems’ role in disaster risk, and only some 35 % use “ecologically-relevant” indicators, showing that ecological systems and their health are generally underrepresented in risk and/or vulnerability assessments. Among the 284 indicators extracted from the papers, most do not capture health directly, with over 60 % being land use land cover (LULC)-related indicators, which offer little insights on the condition of the ecosystem. This paper emphasises the need to move beyond LULC. It identifies indicators that represent characteristics of a healthy ecosystem, linked to <em>e.g.</em> biodiversity and ecosystem connectivity and calls for ecological baselines for understanding and monitoring ecosystem health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411525000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystems play a critical role in reducing disaster risk by providing ecosystem services (ESS) that influence all components of risk. The capacity to deliver ESS depends on the health of the ecosystem itself. Thus, it is key to consider ecosystem health in risk assessments for a comprehensive understanding of disaster risk and effective disaster risk management. The paper reviews ecosystem-related indicators used in disaster risk or vulnerability assessments to better understand how, and to what degree, ecosystems and their health are currently considered in indicator-based assessments relating to flood, drought and storms. Of 231 reviewed papers just under half recognise ecosystems’ role in disaster risk, and only some 35 % use “ecologically-relevant” indicators, showing that ecological systems and their health are generally underrepresented in risk and/or vulnerability assessments. Among the 284 indicators extracted from the papers, most do not capture health directly, with over 60 % being land use land cover (LULC)-related indicators, which offer little insights on the condition of the ecosystem. This paper emphasises the need to move beyond LULC. It identifies indicators that represent characteristics of a healthy ecosystem, linked to e.g. biodiversity and ecosystem connectivity and calls for ecological baselines for understanding and monitoring ecosystem health.
生态系统和灾害风险:回顾灾害风险评估背景下的生态指标,并讨论其对生态系统健康的有用性
生态系统通过提供影响风险所有组成部分的生态系统服务(ESS),在减少灾害风险方面发挥着关键作用。提供ESS的能力取决于生态系统本身的健康状况。因此,在风险评估中考虑生态系统健康是全面了解灾害风险和有效管理灾害风险的关键。本文回顾了灾害风险或脆弱性评估中使用的生态系统相关指标,以更好地了解目前在与洪水、干旱和风暴有关的基于指标的评估中如何以及在何种程度上考虑生态系统及其健康。在231篇被审查的论文中,只有不到一半认识到生态系统在灾害风险中的作用,只有大约35%使用了“生态相关”指标,这表明生态系统及其健康在风险和/或脆弱性评估中普遍代表性不足。从论文中提取的284个指标中,大多数不能直接反映健康状况,超过60%是与土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)相关的指标,这些指标对生态系统状况的了解很少。本文强调需要超越LULC。它确定了代表健康生态系统特征的指标,这些指标与生物多样性和生态系统连通性等有关,并呼吁制定了解和监测生态系统健康的生态基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信