Comparison of CHA2DS2-VASc, C2HEST, HAT2CH2, SYNTAX, GRACE, and SYNTAX II Scores for Predicting New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

IF 0.6
Nazile Bilgin Doğan, Abdullah Kadir Dolu, Selim Ekinci, Ersin Çağrı Şimşek
{"title":"Comparison of CHA2DS2-VASc, C2HEST, HAT2CH2, SYNTAX, GRACE, and SYNTAX II Scores for Predicting New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Nazile Bilgin Doğan, Abdullah Kadir Dolu, Selim Ekinci, Ersin Çağrı Şimşek","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2025.38852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the most effective scoring system for predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Identifying the best predictive tool may help clinicians select the most appropriate personalized treatment based on individual risk scores to prevent NOAF complicating AMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 2,206 patients diagnosed with AMI between June 2021 and January 2023 were included in this study. After excluding cases with missing data, univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted on 1,672 patients to assess the association between baseline characteristics and the development of atrial fibrillation. The CHA2DS2-VASC (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 years, Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category), C2HEST (Coronary artery disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Hypertension, Elderly [age ≥ 75], Systolic heart failure, Thyroid disease), HAT2CH2 (Hypertension, Age > 75, Stroke/TIA, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Heart failure), SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery), GRACE 2.0 (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events), and SYNTAX II scores were calculated for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the SYNTAX score (SxS) had the highest predictive value for NOAF during AMI, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.785 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.767-0.802, P < 0.001), followed by the SYNTAX II score (SxSII) with an AUC of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.728-0.765, P < 0.001), and the GRACE 2.0 risk score (RS) with an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.721-0.758, P < 0.001). It was shown that the modified scores (created by incorporating hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] levels), the primary independent predictive parameter in this study, into the existing risk models demonstrated higher predictive value for NOAF (C-statistic: 0.784-0.794).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining HbA1c levels with SxS yielded the highest diagnostic performance for predicting NOAF during AMI. In this study, while SxS outperformed other risk models, the GRACE 2.0 and SxSII scores also demonstrated relatively strong predictive value and were superior to the CHA2DS2-VASC, C2HEST, and HAT2CH2 scores for predicting NOAF in the setting of AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2025.38852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the most effective scoring system for predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Identifying the best predictive tool may help clinicians select the most appropriate personalized treatment based on individual risk scores to prevent NOAF complicating AMI.

Method: A total of 2,206 patients diagnosed with AMI between June 2021 and January 2023 were included in this study. After excluding cases with missing data, univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted on 1,672 patients to assess the association between baseline characteristics and the development of atrial fibrillation. The CHA2DS2-VASC (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 years, Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category), C2HEST (Coronary artery disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Hypertension, Elderly [age ≥ 75], Systolic heart failure, Thyroid disease), HAT2CH2 (Hypertension, Age > 75, Stroke/TIA, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Heart failure), SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery), GRACE 2.0 (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events), and SYNTAX II scores were calculated for each patient.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the SYNTAX score (SxS) had the highest predictive value for NOAF during AMI, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.785 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.767-0.802, P < 0.001), followed by the SYNTAX II score (SxSII) with an AUC of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.728-0.765, P < 0.001), and the GRACE 2.0 risk score (RS) with an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.721-0.758, P < 0.001). It was shown that the modified scores (created by incorporating hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] levels), the primary independent predictive parameter in this study, into the existing risk models demonstrated higher predictive value for NOAF (C-statistic: 0.784-0.794).

Conclusion: Combining HbA1c levels with SxS yielded the highest diagnostic performance for predicting NOAF during AMI. In this study, while SxS outperformed other risk models, the GRACE 2.0 and SxSII scores also demonstrated relatively strong predictive value and were superior to the CHA2DS2-VASC, C2HEST, and HAT2CH2 scores for predicting NOAF in the setting of AMI.

CHA2DS2-VASc、C2HEST、HAT2CH2、SYNTAX、GRACE和SYNTAX II评分预测新发心房颤动合并急性心肌梗死的比较
目的:本研究评估预测急性心肌梗死(AMI)期间新发心房颤动(NOAF)的最有效评分系统。确定最佳预测工具可以帮助临床医生根据个体风险评分选择最合适的个性化治疗,以防止NOAF并发AMI。方法:本研究共纳入2021年6月至2023年1月诊断为AMI的2206例患者。在排除数据缺失病例后,对1,672例患者进行单变量和多变量分析,以评估基线特征与房颤发展之间的关系。CHA2DS2-VASC(充血性心力衰竭,高血压,年龄≥75岁,糖尿病,中风/TIA/血栓栓塞,血管疾病,年龄65-74岁,性别类别),C2HEST(冠状动脉疾病,慢性阻塞性肺病,高血压,老年人[年龄≥75],收缩期心力衰竭,甲状腺疾病),HAT2CH2(高血压,年龄≥75岁,中风/TIA,慢性阻塞性肺病,心力衰竭),SYNTAX (PCI与Taxus和心脏手术的协同作用),计算每位患者的GRACE 2.0(全球急性冠状动脉事件登记)评分和SYNTAX II评分。结果:受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,SYNTAX评分(SxS)对AMI期间NOAF的预测价值最高,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.785(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.767 ~ 0.802, P < 0.001),其次是SYNTAX II评分(SxSII), AUC为0.747 (95% CI: 0.728 ~ 0.765, P < 0.001), GRACE 2.0风险评分(RS)的AUC为0.740 (95% CI: 0.721 ~ 0.758, P < 0.001)。结果表明,将本研究的主要独立预测参数血红蛋白A1c [HbA1c]水平修改后的评分纳入现有风险模型,对NOAF具有更高的预测价值(C-statistic: 0.784-0.794)。结论:结合HbA1c水平和SxS预测AMI期间NOAF的诊断效果最好。本研究中,在SxS优于其他风险模型的同时,GRACE 2.0和SxSII评分也显示出较强的预测价值,并优于CHA2DS2-VASC、C2HEST和HAT2CH2评分对AMI情景下NOAF的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信