Degeneracy Explains Diversity in Interneuronal Regulation of Pattern Separation in Heterogeneous Dentate Gyrus Networks.

IF 3.8 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Sarang Saini, Rishikesh Narayanan
{"title":"Degeneracy Explains Diversity in Interneuronal Regulation of Pattern Separation in Heterogeneous Dentate Gyrus Networks.","authors":"Sarang Saini, Rishikesh Narayanan","doi":"10.1093/function/zqaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pattern separation, the ability of a network to distinguish similar inputs by transforming them into distinct outputs, was postulated by the Marr-Albus theory to be realized by divergent feedforward excitatory connectivity. Yet, there is evidence for strong but differential regulation of pattern separation by local circuit connectivity. How do we reconcile the conflicting views on local-circuit regulation of pattern separation in circuits receiving divergent feedforward connectivity? Here, we quantitatively examined a population of heterogeneous dentate gyrus (DG) spiking networks where identically divergent feedforward connectivity was enforced. We generated 20 000 random DG networks constructed with thousands of functionally validated, heterogeneous single-neuron models of 4 different DG neuronal subtypes. We recorded network outputs to morphed sets of input patterns and applied quantitative metrics that we developed to assess pattern separation performance of each network. Surprisingly, only 47 of these 20 000 networks (0.23%) manifested effective pattern separation showing that divergent feedforward connectivity alone does not guarantee pattern separation. Instead, our analyses unveiled strong contributions from the 3 interneuron subtypes toward granule cell sparsity and pattern separation, with pronounced network-to-network variability in such contributions. We traced this variability to differences in local synaptic weights across pattern-separating networks, highlighting synaptic degeneracy as a key mechanism that explains diversity in interneuronal regulation of pattern separation. Finally, we found heterogeneous DG networks to be more resilient to synaptic jitter compared to their homogeneous counterparts. Together, our findings reconcile conflicting evidence by revealing degeneracy in DG circuits, whereby similar pattern separation efficacy can arise through diverse interactions among granule cells and interneurons.</p>","PeriodicalId":73119,"journal":{"name":"Function (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Function (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/function/zqaf035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pattern separation, the ability of a network to distinguish similar inputs by transforming them into distinct outputs, was postulated by the Marr-Albus theory to be realized by divergent feedforward excitatory connectivity. Yet, there is evidence for strong but differential regulation of pattern separation by local circuit connectivity. How do we reconcile the conflicting views on local-circuit regulation of pattern separation in circuits receiving divergent feedforward connectivity? Here, we quantitatively examined a population of heterogeneous dentate gyrus (DG) spiking networks where identically divergent feedforward connectivity was enforced. We generated 20 000 random DG networks constructed with thousands of functionally validated, heterogeneous single-neuron models of 4 different DG neuronal subtypes. We recorded network outputs to morphed sets of input patterns and applied quantitative metrics that we developed to assess pattern separation performance of each network. Surprisingly, only 47 of these 20 000 networks (0.23%) manifested effective pattern separation showing that divergent feedforward connectivity alone does not guarantee pattern separation. Instead, our analyses unveiled strong contributions from the 3 interneuron subtypes toward granule cell sparsity and pattern separation, with pronounced network-to-network variability in such contributions. We traced this variability to differences in local synaptic weights across pattern-separating networks, highlighting synaptic degeneracy as a key mechanism that explains diversity in interneuronal regulation of pattern separation. Finally, we found heterogeneous DG networks to be more resilient to synaptic jitter compared to their homogeneous counterparts. Together, our findings reconcile conflicting evidence by revealing degeneracy in DG circuits, whereby similar pattern separation efficacy can arise through diverse interactions among granule cells and interneurons.

退化解释了异质齿状回网络中模式分离的神经元间调节的多样性。
模式分离,即网络通过将相似输入转换为不同输出来区分相似输入的能力,是由马尔-阿不思理论假设的,通过发散前馈兴奋性连接来实现。然而,有证据表明,局部电路连接对模式分离有强烈但不同的调节。在接收发散前馈连接的电路中,我们如何调和关于模式分离的局部电路调节的相互矛盾的观点?在这里,我们定量地检查了异质齿状回(DG)尖峰网络的种群,其中相同的前馈连接是强制的。我们生成了20,000个随机DG网络,其中包含数千个功能验证的、异构的4种不同DG神经元亚型的单神经元模型。我们将网络输出记录到变形的输入模式集,并应用我们开发的定量指标来评估每个网络的模式分离性能。令人惊讶的是,这2万个网络中只有47个(0.23%)表现出有效的模式分离,这表明发散前馈连接本身并不能保证模式分离。相反,我们的分析揭示了三种中间神经元亚型对颗粒细胞稀疏性和模式分离的强烈贡献,这种贡献具有明显的网络对网络的可变性。我们将这种可变性追溯到模式分离网络中局部突触权重的差异,强调突触退化是解释模式分离神经元间调节多样性的关键机制。最后,我们发现异质DG网络比同质DG网络对突触抖动更有弹性。总之,我们的研究结果通过揭示DG回路中的退化来调和相互矛盾的证据,从而通过颗粒细胞和中间神经元之间的不同相互作用产生类似的模式分离效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信