Characteristics of Prepharmacy Undergraduate Institutions as a Predictor of First-Year Pharmacy School Success.

IF 3.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sean P Kane, Christian McCaughey, Danielle M Candelario, Scott Hanes, Khyati Patel, Abbie Lyden
{"title":"Characteristics of Prepharmacy Undergraduate Institutions as a Predictor of First-Year Pharmacy School Success.","authors":"Sean P Kane, Christian McCaughey, Danielle M Candelario, Scott Hanes, Khyati Patel, Abbie Lyden","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of undergraduate institutional characteristics on first-year pharmacy (P1) success at a private, 4-year program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of students matriculating from 2020 to 2023 was conducted. Characteristics of each student's primary undergraduate institution, such as admission rate, highest degree offered, enrollment size, and other factors, were obtained from the US Department of Education Scorecard. Student academic metrics and outcomes in the P1 year were also collected. A mixed-effects model was used to identify independent undergraduate institutional predictors of P1 success, defined as passing all courses without remediation and progressing on time to the second year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 162 students from 82 undergraduate institutions were included. Univariate analysis demonstrated that undergraduate institutions offering a bachelor's degree or higher, having a lower admission rate (or not having an open admissions policy), and having at least 50% full-time faculty were predictors of P1 success. Student metrics such as prematriculation grade point average (GPA) and achieving a bachelor's degree were not predictive of P1 success, although prematriculation GPA was independently associated with P1 GPA. Collinearity among predictive undergraduate institution characteristics was common. In a mixed-effects model, P1's success was best predicted by the undergraduate institution's admission rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple undergraduate institution characteristics significantly predict P1 success, whereas student academic metrics were not predictive in our analyses. These findings challenge the reliance on traditional academic metrics, particularly GPA, and suggest that future research should focus on holistic admissions approaches that include both institutional and nonacademic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of undergraduate institutional characteristics on first-year pharmacy (P1) success at a private, 4-year program.

Methods: A retrospective review of students matriculating from 2020 to 2023 was conducted. Characteristics of each student's primary undergraduate institution, such as admission rate, highest degree offered, enrollment size, and other factors, were obtained from the US Department of Education Scorecard. Student academic metrics and outcomes in the P1 year were also collected. A mixed-effects model was used to identify independent undergraduate institutional predictors of P1 success, defined as passing all courses without remediation and progressing on time to the second year.

Results: A total of 162 students from 82 undergraduate institutions were included. Univariate analysis demonstrated that undergraduate institutions offering a bachelor's degree or higher, having a lower admission rate (or not having an open admissions policy), and having at least 50% full-time faculty were predictors of P1 success. Student metrics such as prematriculation grade point average (GPA) and achieving a bachelor's degree were not predictive of P1 success, although prematriculation GPA was independently associated with P1 GPA. Collinearity among predictive undergraduate institution characteristics was common. In a mixed-effects model, P1's success was best predicted by the undergraduate institution's admission rate.

Conclusion: Multiple undergraduate institution characteristics significantly predict P1 success, whereas student academic metrics were not predictive in our analyses. These findings challenge the reliance on traditional academic metrics, particularly GPA, and suggest that future research should focus on holistic admissions approaches that include both institutional and nonacademic factors.

药学预科本科院校的特点作为第一年药学学校成功的预测因子。
目的:评估本科院校特征对一所私立四年制药学院(P1)一年级成功的影响。方法:对我校2020 - 2023届新生进行回顾性分析。每个学生的主要本科院校特征,如录取率、最高学位、入学规模等因素,均来自美国教育部记分卡。还收集了1年级学生的学业指标和成绩。使用混合效应模型来确定P1成功的独立本科机构预测因素,P1成功的定义是通过所有课程,没有补课,按时进入第二年。结果:共纳入82所本科院校162名学生。单变量分析表明,提供学士学位或更高学位、录取率较低(或没有开放的招生政策)、全职教师人数至少占50%的本科院校是P1成功的预测因素。学生指标,如入学前的平均成绩点(GPA)和获得学士学位,并不能预测P1的成功,尽管入学前的GPA与P1的GPA独立相关。预测本科院校特征的共线性是常见的。在混合效应模型中,P1成功与否最能由本科院校的录取率来预测。结论:在我们的分析中,多个本科院校的特征显著地预测了P1的成功,而学生的学术指标并不能预测P1的成功。这些发现挑战了传统学术指标(尤其是GPA)的依赖,并建议未来的研究应侧重于包括机构和非学术因素的整体招生方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信