Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.
Cassandra L Boness, Hanna Hebden, David T Lardier, Liliana Spurgeon, Ashli Timmons, Leonard J Simms, Kamilla L Venner, Katie Witkiewitz
{"title":"Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.","authors":"Cassandra L Boness, Hanna Hebden, David T Lardier, Liliana Spurgeon, Ashli Timmons, Leonard J Simms, Kamilla L Venner, Katie Witkiewitz","doi":"10.1177/21677026241304339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"13 4","pages":"720-739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241304339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.
期刊介绍:
The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.