Patient-centred estimation of multimorbidity in chronic disease populations: a novel approach integrating global burden of disease metrics and healthcare administrative data.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daniela Fortuna, Luana Caselli, Michele Romoli, Luca Vignatelli, Anna Elisabetta Vaudano, Jessica Mandrioli, Susanna Malagù, Massimo Costantini, Giuseppe Tibaldi, Gabriela Gildoni, Maria Guarino, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Luca Iaboli, Lucia Alberghini, Marco Fusconi, Angela Maria Grazia Pacilli, Stefano Nava, Silvia Mancinelli, Maurizia Rolli
{"title":"Patient-centred estimation of multimorbidity in chronic disease populations: a novel approach integrating global burden of disease metrics and healthcare administrative data.","authors":"Daniela Fortuna, Luana Caselli, Michele Romoli, Luca Vignatelli, Anna Elisabetta Vaudano, Jessica Mandrioli, Susanna Malagù, Massimo Costantini, Giuseppe Tibaldi, Gabriela Gildoni, Maria Guarino, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Luca Iaboli, Lucia Alberghini, Marco Fusconi, Angela Maria Grazia Pacilli, Stefano Nava, Silvia Mancinelli, Maurizia Rolli","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00404-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although chronic diseases represent a growing global health priority, significant gaps remain in understanding the burden of multimorbidity. This study developed an original methodology to estimate the burden of thirty major chronic diseases at the individual patient level, in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life years (DALYs), Years Lived with Disability (YLD), and Years of Life Lost due to premature death (YLL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Disability weights (DWs) estimated by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study were integrated with information from healthcare databases. A panel of medical specialists established the criteria for assigning the level of severity, and thus a specific DW, to each chronic disease. The patient-centred YLD metric was estimated as the cumulative of the combined DWs over the previous ten years. We also measured the Disability Weight Fraction of each coexisting disease (DWF). We illustrated this method using healthcare databases from a large Italian region to assess the impact of chronic diseases and multimorbidity at progressive levels of analysis: health status of the regional chronic disease population, burden of individual chronic diseases and patient clinical complexity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike the standard GBD estimates, the new method provided precise metrics for multimorbidity, as shown by the comparison on the disability calculated for 4 main chronic diseases. Real-world estimates from the new method highlighted that comorbidity accounted for most of the YLD: for instance, about 88% of the YLD of patients with heart failure was explained by concomitant conditions. DALYs were higher among females than males in most age groups. In the younger groups, psychiatric conditions explained approximately 40% and 25% of YLD among males and females, respectively. Finally, the patient-centred YLD metric was a good predictor of death (c-statistic = 0.779).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel method provides insights into the measurement of multimorbidity, based on the disability fraction of each concomitant health condition, which is crucial for defining priority areas for healthcare interventions. The patient-centred estimates may serve to identify subgroups of chronic disease patients with specific healthcare needs and trajectories among a given population. Importantly, measuring the relative contribution of each disease to the patient's burden of multimorbidity favours the planning of multidisciplinary care pathways that are more responsive to individual needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00404-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although chronic diseases represent a growing global health priority, significant gaps remain in understanding the burden of multimorbidity. This study developed an original methodology to estimate the burden of thirty major chronic diseases at the individual patient level, in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life years (DALYs), Years Lived with Disability (YLD), and Years of Life Lost due to premature death (YLL).

Methods: The Disability weights (DWs) estimated by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study were integrated with information from healthcare databases. A panel of medical specialists established the criteria for assigning the level of severity, and thus a specific DW, to each chronic disease. The patient-centred YLD metric was estimated as the cumulative of the combined DWs over the previous ten years. We also measured the Disability Weight Fraction of each coexisting disease (DWF). We illustrated this method using healthcare databases from a large Italian region to assess the impact of chronic diseases and multimorbidity at progressive levels of analysis: health status of the regional chronic disease population, burden of individual chronic diseases and patient clinical complexity.

Results: Unlike the standard GBD estimates, the new method provided precise metrics for multimorbidity, as shown by the comparison on the disability calculated for 4 main chronic diseases. Real-world estimates from the new method highlighted that comorbidity accounted for most of the YLD: for instance, about 88% of the YLD of patients with heart failure was explained by concomitant conditions. DALYs were higher among females than males in most age groups. In the younger groups, psychiatric conditions explained approximately 40% and 25% of YLD among males and females, respectively. Finally, the patient-centred YLD metric was a good predictor of death (c-statistic = 0.779).

Conclusions: This novel method provides insights into the measurement of multimorbidity, based on the disability fraction of each concomitant health condition, which is crucial for defining priority areas for healthcare interventions. The patient-centred estimates may serve to identify subgroups of chronic disease patients with specific healthcare needs and trajectories among a given population. Importantly, measuring the relative contribution of each disease to the patient's burden of multimorbidity favours the planning of multidisciplinary care pathways that are more responsive to individual needs.

慢性疾病人群中以患者为中心的多发病估计:一种整合全球疾病负担指标和医疗保健管理数据的新方法。
背景:尽管慢性病日益成为全球卫生重点,但在了解多病负担方面仍存在重大差距。本研究开发了一种原始的方法,以残疾调整生命年(DALYs)、残疾生活年(YLD)和因过早死亡而损失的生命年(YLL)来估计患者个体水平上30种主要慢性病的负担。方法:将全球疾病负担(GBD)研究估计的残疾权重(DWs)与卫生保健数据库的信息相结合。一个医学专家小组确定了分配严重程度的标准,从而确定了每种慢性疾病的具体死亡人数。以患者为中心的YLD指标估计为过去十年中合并DWs的累积。我们还测量了每种共存疾病的残疾体重分数(DWF)。我们使用来自意大利一个大地区的医疗保健数据库来说明这种方法,以评估慢性疾病和多病在渐进分析水平上的影响:区域慢性疾病人群的健康状况、个体慢性疾病的负担和患者临床复杂性。结果:与标准GBD估计不同,新方法提供了精确的多发病指标,如对4种主要慢性疾病计算的残疾的比较。新方法对现实世界的估计强调,合并症占了大部分的YLD:例如,约88%的心力衰竭患者的YLD是由伴随疾病造成的。在大多数年龄组中,女性的DALYs高于男性。在较年轻的群体中,精神疾病分别解释了男性和女性中大约40%和25%的YLD。最后,以患者为中心的YLD指标是一个很好的死亡预测指标(c-statistic = 0.779)。结论:这种新方法提供了基于每种伴随健康状况的残疾比例的多重发病率测量的见解,这对于确定医疗保健干预的优先领域至关重要。以患者为中心的估计可能有助于确定特定人群中具有特定医疗保健需求和轨迹的慢性疾病患者亚组。重要的是,衡量每种疾病对患者多重发病负担的相对贡献,有利于规划更能满足个人需求的多学科护理途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信