Samantha S Massenzio, Sidra Zafar, Jordan D Deaner
{"title":"Treatment of uveitic macular edema: a review.","authors":"Samantha S Massenzio, Sidra Zafar, Jordan D Deaner","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the treatment modalities commonly available or under investigation for uveitic macular edema.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Corticosteroids are a mainstay of treatment and can be administered topically, periocularly, intravitreally, suprachoroidally, and systemically. Advances in drug development aim to target delivery of corticosteroids to the posterior segment while sparing anterior segment structures to avoid intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation. Nonsteroidal alternatives including intravitreal anti-VEGF, intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal anti-IL6, systemic acetazolamide, systemic antimetabolites, systemic biologics, and interferons have all been studied as alternatives that would allow for potential reduction or discontinuation of corticosteroid use. Pars plana vitrectomy remains a controversial option for patients with uveitic macular edema refractory to other medical therapies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Uveitic macular edema is a common complication of uveitis that can cause significant vision loss and persist even after the resolution of other signs of intraocular inflammation. Treatment modalities aim to reduce macular edema while limiting adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: To review the treatment modalities commonly available or under investigation for uveitic macular edema.
Recent findings: Corticosteroids are a mainstay of treatment and can be administered topically, periocularly, intravitreally, suprachoroidally, and systemically. Advances in drug development aim to target delivery of corticosteroids to the posterior segment while sparing anterior segment structures to avoid intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation. Nonsteroidal alternatives including intravitreal anti-VEGF, intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal anti-IL6, systemic acetazolamide, systemic antimetabolites, systemic biologics, and interferons have all been studied as alternatives that would allow for potential reduction or discontinuation of corticosteroid use. Pars plana vitrectomy remains a controversial option for patients with uveitic macular edema refractory to other medical therapies.
Summary: Uveitic macular edema is a common complication of uveitis that can cause significant vision loss and persist even after the resolution of other signs of intraocular inflammation. Treatment modalities aim to reduce macular edema while limiting adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.