Allograft Use in Peripheral Knee Ligament Injuries (MCL and LCL): A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1097/JSA.0000000000000429
Vasileios S Akrivos, Nifon Gkekas, Ilias Chantes, George A Komnos, Antonios A Koutalos, Nikolaos Stefanou, Michael Hantes
{"title":"Allograft Use in Peripheral Knee Ligament Injuries (MCL and LCL): A Systematic Review.","authors":"Vasileios S Akrivos, Nifon Gkekas, Ilias Chantes, George A Komnos, Antonios A Koutalos, Nikolaos Stefanou, Michael Hantes","doi":"10.1097/JSA.0000000000000429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive studies on the exclusive use of allografts for medial collateral ligament (MCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction are limited. This review assessed clinical and functional outcomes of allograft use for MCL and PLC reconstruction. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Scopus databases to identify published articles on clinical studies relevant to MCL and LCL reconstruction with the use of allografts. The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of stability and functional outcomes, Lysholm score, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Tegner activity scale, Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Marx score, complications, and graft failure. Nineteen studies with 547 patients undergoing LCL reconstructions using allografts were analyzed. The most common allograft used was the Achilles tendon. Mean lateral opening improved from 6.21 mm preoperatively to 1.88 mm postoperatively, with IKDC and Lysholm scores increasing significantly (44.02 to 74.78 and 53.44 to 85.68, respectively). The failure rate for LCL/PLC reconstructions was 11.13%, and complications occurred in 19.75%. For MCL reconstructions, 5 studies with 135 patients showed a reduction in medial opening from 9.7 mm to 2.33 mm, with increases in IKDC and Lysholm scores (49.8 to 75.92 and 69.3 to 85.46, respectively). The failure rate was 4.19%, with a 10.93% complication rate. The use of allografts for LCL and PLC reconstruction demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, with stable and functional knees, though there was a relatively high graft failure rate. Similarly, positive results were observed in MCL reconstruction with allografts. Level of Evidence: Level-IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":49481,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review","volume":"33 3","pages":"93-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive studies on the exclusive use of allografts for medial collateral ligament (MCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction are limited. This review assessed clinical and functional outcomes of allograft use for MCL and PLC reconstruction. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Scopus databases to identify published articles on clinical studies relevant to MCL and LCL reconstruction with the use of allografts. The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of stability and functional outcomes, Lysholm score, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Tegner activity scale, Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Marx score, complications, and graft failure. Nineteen studies with 547 patients undergoing LCL reconstructions using allografts were analyzed. The most common allograft used was the Achilles tendon. Mean lateral opening improved from 6.21 mm preoperatively to 1.88 mm postoperatively, with IKDC and Lysholm scores increasing significantly (44.02 to 74.78 and 53.44 to 85.68, respectively). The failure rate for LCL/PLC reconstructions was 11.13%, and complications occurred in 19.75%. For MCL reconstructions, 5 studies with 135 patients showed a reduction in medial opening from 9.7 mm to 2.33 mm, with increases in IKDC and Lysholm scores (49.8 to 75.92 and 69.3 to 85.46, respectively). The failure rate was 4.19%, with a 10.93% complication rate. The use of allografts for LCL and PLC reconstruction demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, with stable and functional knees, though there was a relatively high graft failure rate. Similarly, positive results were observed in MCL reconstruction with allografts. Level of Evidence: Level-IV.

同种异体移植在膝外周韧带损伤(MCL和LCL)中的应用:系统综述。
同种异体移植物用于内侧副韧带(MCL)和后外侧角(PLC)重建的综合研究是有限的。本综述评估了同种异体移植用于MCL和PLC重建的临床和功能结果。遵循了PRISMA准则。在PubMed、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Cochrane (CENTRAL)和Scopus数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,以确定与使用同种异体移植物重建MCL和LCL相关的临床研究发表的文章。根据稳定性和功能结局、Lysholm评分、客观和主观国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Tegner活动量表、辛辛那提膝关节评分系统、Marx评分、并发症和移植物失败对符合条件的研究结果进行分析。本文分析了19项研究中547例采用同种异体移植进行LCL重建的患者。最常用的同种异体移植物是跟腱。平均侧开度由术前的6.21 mm提高到术后的1.88 mm, IKDC评分和Lysholm评分显著提高(分别为44.02 ~ 74.78和53.44 ~ 85.68)。LCL/PLC重建失败率为11.13%,并发症发生率为19.75%。对于MCL重建,5项研究共135例患者显示内侧开口从9.7 mm减少到2.33 mm, IKDC和Lysholm评分增加(分别为49.8至75.92和69.3至85.46)。手术失败率4.19%,并发症发生率10.93%。同种异体移植物用于LCL和PLC重建显示出令人满意的结果,膝关节稳定和功能良好,尽管移植物失败率相对较高。同样,同种异体移植物重建MCL也有阳性结果。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review helps physicians digest the large volume of clinical literature in sports medicine and arthroscopy, identify the most important new developments, and apply new information effectively in clinical practice. Each issue is guest-edited by an acknowledged expert and focuses on a single topic or controversy. The Guest Editor invites the leading specialists on the topic to write review articles that highlight the most important advances. This unique format makes the journal more in-depth, authoritative, and practical than most publications in this field. The journal also includes dozens of full-color and black-and-white arthroscopic images and illustrations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信