Revolutions of Rice - Agrarian Acceleration and Modernist Metanarratives among 'Indigenous' Peasants in Laos.

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Anthropological Forum Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00664677.2025.2496676
Paul-David Lutz
{"title":"Revolutions of Rice - Agrarian Acceleration and Modernist Metanarratives among 'Indigenous' Peasants in Laos.","authors":"Paul-David Lutz","doi":"10.1080/00664677.2025.2496676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article engages recent calls to bring human-centred historical time into conversation with more-than-human 'natural time'. It relates the Marxist-cum-market-Leninist Lao state's longstanding pursuit of revolution in agriculture to (memories of) change in rice seed selection and cultivation among 'indigenous' Khmu peasants in the country's north. Drawing on ethnography, ethnographic history and ethnography of history, I document and analyse how the decidedly anthropocentric and acceleration-focused Lao revolutionary project has been shaping - and, I argue, severing - Khmu-rice entanglements. Identifying acceleration at the locus of ambivalent local experiences of be(com)ing 'modern', I offer a grounded counterbalance to the comparative neglect of the salience of modernist metanarratives among indigenous peoples. This article also offers new vantage on questions of nostalgia, continuity and rupture in the Lao socialist revolution, as well as on broader debates about how to reconcile developing countries' right to 'catch up' with the equally pressing need for agrobiodiversity conservation and global ecological redress.</p>","PeriodicalId":45505,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Forum","volume":"35 1","pages":"24-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2025.2496676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article engages recent calls to bring human-centred historical time into conversation with more-than-human 'natural time'. It relates the Marxist-cum-market-Leninist Lao state's longstanding pursuit of revolution in agriculture to (memories of) change in rice seed selection and cultivation among 'indigenous' Khmu peasants in the country's north. Drawing on ethnography, ethnographic history and ethnography of history, I document and analyse how the decidedly anthropocentric and acceleration-focused Lao revolutionary project has been shaping - and, I argue, severing - Khmu-rice entanglements. Identifying acceleration at the locus of ambivalent local experiences of be(com)ing 'modern', I offer a grounded counterbalance to the comparative neglect of the salience of modernist metanarratives among indigenous peoples. This article also offers new vantage on questions of nostalgia, continuity and rupture in the Lao socialist revolution, as well as on broader debates about how to reconcile developing countries' right to 'catch up' with the equally pressing need for agrobiodiversity conservation and global ecological redress.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

水稻革命——老挝“土著”农民的土地加速与现代主义元叙事。
本文采用了最近的呼吁,将以人为中心的历史时间与超越人类的“自然时间”进行对话。它将马克思主义和市场列宁主义的老挝政府长期以来对农业革命的追求与(记忆中的)水稻种子选择和种植在该国北部“本土”Khmu农民中的变化联系起来。借助民族志、民族志历史和历史民族志,我记录并分析了以人类为中心、以加速为重点的老挝革命计划是如何塑造——我认为是如何切断——khmum -rice的纠葛的。我确定了在走向“现代”的矛盾的地方经验的加速,我提供了一个接地的平衡,以相对忽视现代主义元叙事在土著人民中的突出地位。这篇文章还为老挝社会主义革命的怀旧、连续性和断裂问题提供了新的优势,以及关于如何协调发展中国家“赶上”农业生物多样性保护和全球生态补救同样迫切需要的权利的更广泛的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropological Forum
Anthropological Forum ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Anthropological Forum is a journal of social anthropology and comparative sociology that was founded in 1963 and has a distinguished publication history. The journal provides a forum for both established and innovative approaches to anthropological research. A special section devoted to contributions on applied anthropology appears periodically. The editors are especially keen to publish new approaches based on ethnographic and theoretical work in the journal"s established areas of strength: Australian culture and society, Aboriginal Australia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信