One-stage hybrid operation for hypervascular central nervous system tumors: a single-center experience of 31 cases.

Q2 Medicine
Mingze Wang, Zhikang Zhao, Shuo Wang, Yong Cao, Jizong Zhao
{"title":"One-stage hybrid operation for hypervascular central nervous system tumors: a single-center experience of 31 cases.","authors":"Mingze Wang, Zhikang Zhao, Shuo Wang, Yong Cao, Jizong Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s41016-025-00400-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection for hypervascular central nervous system tumors poses a significant challenge for neurosurgeons. Controversy remains about the effect and safety of the traditional therapeutic mode, which combines preoperative embolization and delayed tumor resection, remain controversial. Whether a one-stage hybrid operation modality offers a novel approach to address treatment challenges in a safer and more effective way remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the neurosurgical operation database, we retrospectively reviewed patients with hypervascular central nervous system tumor patients who underwent one-stage hybrid operation between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2024. Intraoperative blood loss, the percentage of tumor devascularization, and complications associated with embolization were recorded. Novel embolization strategies used to facilitate the resection of tumors in one-stage hybrid operations were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 31 hypervascular central nervous system tumor patients were recruited. The main pathological types included various types of meningiomas (45.2%), hemangioblastomas (16.1%), paragangliomas (9.7%), and solitary fibrous tumors (9.7%). Embolization of tumor-feeding arterial pedicles alone was achieved in 25 patients, and various materials, such as ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer, Guglielmi detachable coil, and silk suture segments, were used, in which the tumor blood supply was blocked satisfactorily and the texture became softer postembolization. Intratumoral vascular beds were embolized in six patients. The mean occlusion rate of the target pedicle was 83.3%. Gross-total resection was achieved in 22 patients (71.0%), with a mean blood loss volume of 1127 ± 1114.4 mL (ranging from 150 - 4500 ml). No embolization-related complications occurred. Deterioration of neurological deficits was observed in three patients (9.7%) at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A one-stage hybrid operation is safe for the treatment of hypervascular central nervous system tumors. A prospective study to evaluating its safety and efficacy compared with separate-stage treatment is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36700,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Neurosurgical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-025-00400-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection for hypervascular central nervous system tumors poses a significant challenge for neurosurgeons. Controversy remains about the effect and safety of the traditional therapeutic mode, which combines preoperative embolization and delayed tumor resection, remain controversial. Whether a one-stage hybrid operation modality offers a novel approach to address treatment challenges in a safer and more effective way remains unknown.

Methods: From the neurosurgical operation database, we retrospectively reviewed patients with hypervascular central nervous system tumor patients who underwent one-stage hybrid operation between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2024. Intraoperative blood loss, the percentage of tumor devascularization, and complications associated with embolization were recorded. Novel embolization strategies used to facilitate the resection of tumors in one-stage hybrid operations were analyzed.

Results: In total, 31 hypervascular central nervous system tumor patients were recruited. The main pathological types included various types of meningiomas (45.2%), hemangioblastomas (16.1%), paragangliomas (9.7%), and solitary fibrous tumors (9.7%). Embolization of tumor-feeding arterial pedicles alone was achieved in 25 patients, and various materials, such as ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer, Guglielmi detachable coil, and silk suture segments, were used, in which the tumor blood supply was blocked satisfactorily and the texture became softer postembolization. Intratumoral vascular beds were embolized in six patients. The mean occlusion rate of the target pedicle was 83.3%. Gross-total resection was achieved in 22 patients (71.0%), with a mean blood loss volume of 1127 ± 1114.4 mL (ranging from 150 - 4500 ml). No embolization-related complications occurred. Deterioration of neurological deficits was observed in three patients (9.7%) at discharge.

Conclusion: A one-stage hybrid operation is safe for the treatment of hypervascular central nervous system tumors. A prospective study to evaluating its safety and efficacy compared with separate-stage treatment is needed.

Abstract Image

一期混合手术治疗高血管性中枢神经系统肿瘤31例。
背景:手术切除高血管中枢神经系统肿瘤是神经外科医生面临的一个重大挑战。传统的术前栓塞与肿瘤延迟切除相结合的治疗方式的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。单阶段混合手术模式是否能以更安全、更有效的方式解决治疗挑战,目前尚不清楚。方法:从神经外科手术数据库中,回顾性分析2014年1月1日至2024年9月30日行一期混合手术的高血管中枢神经系统肿瘤患者。记录术中出血量、肿瘤断流率和栓塞相关并发症。分析了在一期混合手术中用于促进肿瘤切除的新型栓塞策略。结果:共纳入31例高血管性中枢神经系统肿瘤患者。主要病理类型为各类脑膜瘤(45.2%)、血管母细胞瘤(16.1%)、副神经节瘤(9.7%)、单发纤维瘤(9.7%)。25例患者单独栓塞肿瘤供血动脉蒂,采用乙烯-乙烯醇共聚物、Guglielmi可拆卸线圈、丝缝线段等多种材料,栓塞后肿瘤血供通畅,质地柔软。6例患者瘤内血管床栓塞。靶蒂平均闭塞率为83.3%。22例(71.0%)患者实现了全切除,平均失血量为1127±1114.4 mL (150 - 4500 mL)。无栓塞相关并发症发生。3例(9.7%)患者出院时神经功能缺损恶化。结论:一期混合手术治疗高血管性中枢神经系统肿瘤是安全的。需要前瞻性研究来评价其与分阶段治疗的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信