The undercounting of Indigenous Māori imprisoned by the New Zealand carceral state: a national record study.

IF 2.6 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Paula Toko King, Frederieke Sanne Petrović-van der Deen, Melissa McLeod, Ricci Harris, Cheryl Davies, Donna Cormack, Tristram Ingham, Bernadette Jones, Bridget Robson, Natalie Paki Paki, Gabrielle Baker, Belinda Tuari-Toma, Jeannine Stairmand, Marama Cole, Tīria Pehi, Julia Carr, Christopher Kemp, Marshall H Chin, Ruth Cunningham
{"title":"The undercounting of Indigenous Māori imprisoned by the New Zealand carceral state: a national record study.","authors":"Paula Toko King, Frederieke Sanne Petrović-van der Deen, Melissa McLeod, Ricci Harris, Cheryl Davies, Donna Cormack, Tristram Ingham, Bernadette Jones, Bridget Robson, Natalie Paki Paki, Gabrielle Baker, Belinda Tuari-Toma, Jeannine Stairmand, Marama Cole, Tīria Pehi, Julia Carr, Christopher Kemp, Marshall H Chin, Ruth Cunningham","doi":"10.1186/s40352-025-00355-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indigenous Māori are imprisoned on a mass scale by the nation-state currently known as New Zealand, driven by racialised inequities that occur across the criminal legal system and a rapidly expanding carceral state. Lack of reliable data limits the ability to monitor and evaluate the health and disability impacts of imprisonment on Māori. We examined ethnicity data quality; specifically, potential miscounting of Māori in prison. All individuals who experienced at least one night of imprisonment between 2018 and 2021 were selected from the Department of Corrections (Corrections) data in the Stats NZ Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI). We compared counts and proportions of Māori using two sources of ethnicity information; Corrections and IDI's core data. Within this cohort, we compared self-identified ethnicity from the 2018 Census with ethnicity recorded in Corrections data available in the IDI (via individual linkage), to assess levels of match between datasets and calculate net undercount.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesser numbers of Māori were recorded in the Corrections data compared to the IDI's core data (52% versus 57% of the study cohort), a pattern observed across all age and gender groups, and amongst those sentenced and on remand. For the linked analysis, only one third (34%) of the cohort linked to the IDI central spine had self-identified ethnicity from the 2018 Census. Of this group, 46% self-identified as Māori ethnicity. When this information was compared to ethnicity information reported by Corrections for the same individuals, there was a 12% undercount of Māori in Corrections data. The net undercount of Māori was 6%, equating to at least an extra 405 Māori imprisoned than what is publicly reported by government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reliable data inclusive of high-quality ethnicity data are critical for understanding and monitoring Māori health in terms of resource allocation, policy decisions, and performance of health and disability services for Māori imprisoned in NZ. Systemic undercounting of Māori in prisons is a breach of Indigenous rights to monitor and evaluate impacts of government actions and inactions for Māori. We do not accept the inevitability of prisons but whilst prisons exist, and until there are no prisons left on Māori whenua (lands), an all-of-government approach to prioritisation of high-quality ethnicity data across the criminal legal system that meets obligations to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and international human rights instruments is urgently required.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00355-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indigenous Māori are imprisoned on a mass scale by the nation-state currently known as New Zealand, driven by racialised inequities that occur across the criminal legal system and a rapidly expanding carceral state. Lack of reliable data limits the ability to monitor and evaluate the health and disability impacts of imprisonment on Māori. We examined ethnicity data quality; specifically, potential miscounting of Māori in prison. All individuals who experienced at least one night of imprisonment between 2018 and 2021 were selected from the Department of Corrections (Corrections) data in the Stats NZ Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI). We compared counts and proportions of Māori using two sources of ethnicity information; Corrections and IDI's core data. Within this cohort, we compared self-identified ethnicity from the 2018 Census with ethnicity recorded in Corrections data available in the IDI (via individual linkage), to assess levels of match between datasets and calculate net undercount.

Results: Lesser numbers of Māori were recorded in the Corrections data compared to the IDI's core data (52% versus 57% of the study cohort), a pattern observed across all age and gender groups, and amongst those sentenced and on remand. For the linked analysis, only one third (34%) of the cohort linked to the IDI central spine had self-identified ethnicity from the 2018 Census. Of this group, 46% self-identified as Māori ethnicity. When this information was compared to ethnicity information reported by Corrections for the same individuals, there was a 12% undercount of Māori in Corrections data. The net undercount of Māori was 6%, equating to at least an extra 405 Māori imprisoned than what is publicly reported by government.

Conclusions: Reliable data inclusive of high-quality ethnicity data are critical for understanding and monitoring Māori health in terms of resource allocation, policy decisions, and performance of health and disability services for Māori imprisoned in NZ. Systemic undercounting of Māori in prisons is a breach of Indigenous rights to monitor and evaluate impacts of government actions and inactions for Māori. We do not accept the inevitability of prisons but whilst prisons exist, and until there are no prisons left on Māori whenua (lands), an all-of-government approach to prioritisation of high-quality ethnicity data across the criminal legal system that meets obligations to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and international human rights instruments is urgently required.

被新西兰监禁的土著居民Māori被低估:一项国家记录研究。
背景:土著Māori被目前被称为新西兰的民族国家大规模监禁,这是由刑事法律体系中出现的种族化不平等和迅速扩大的监禁国家所驱动的。缺乏可靠的数据限制了监测和评估监禁对Māori健康和残疾影响的能力。我们检查了种族数据质量;具体来说,就是在监狱中可能出现的Māori错误计数。所有在2018年至2021年期间至少经历过一个晚上监禁的个人都是从新西兰统计局综合数据基础设施(IDI)的惩教部数据中选出的。我们使用两个种族信息来源比较了Māori的计数和比例;修正和IDI的核心数据。在这一队列中,我们将2018年人口普查中自我认定的种族与IDI中可用的修正数据中记录的种族(通过个人联系)进行了比较,以评估数据集之间的匹配水平并计算净少计。结果:与IDI的核心数据相比,惩教数据中记录的Māori人数较少(52%对57%的研究队列),这一模式在所有年龄和性别群体中以及在被判刑和还押人员中都可以观察到。在相关分析中,与IDI中央脊柱相关的队列中,只有三分之一(34%)的人在2018年人口普查中自我认同种族。在这个群体中,46%的人认为自己是Māori种族。当将此信息与更正报告的同一个人的种族信息进行比较时,更正数据中Māori的计数少了12%。Māori的净漏报率为6%,相当于至少比政府公开报道的数字多出405 Māori。结论:包括高质量族裔数据在内的可靠数据对于了解和监测Māori在押人员在资源分配、政策决策以及健康和残疾服务绩效方面的健康状况至关重要。监狱中对Māori的系统性低估侵犯了土著居民监督和评估政府对Māori的作为和不作为的影响的权利。我们不接受监狱的不可避免性,但在监狱存在的同时,在Māori whenua(土地)上没有监狱之前,迫切需要一种全政府的方法,在整个刑事法律系统中优先考虑高质量的种族数据,以履行对《提里提-怀唐伊》和国际人权文书的义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信