Trade law and effective electronic cigarette regulation design.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elizabeth Sheargold, Genevieve Wilkinson
{"title":"Trade law and effective electronic cigarette regulation design.","authors":"Elizabeth Sheargold, Genevieve Wilkinson","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-059004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This special communication provides recommendations for policymakers on how to regulate electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) without violating international trade rules. Concerns are increasing that e-cigarette consumption poses serious harms to health, prompting a recent call to action from the WHO for regulations to lower the appeal of e-cigarettes and address the threat they pose to global populations. Despite this call, no agreement on an appropriate regulatory approach has been reached between the parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control or in any other multilateral forum. In the absence of multilateral consensus, states have implemented a diverse range of frameworks, including restrictions on packaging, marketing and advertising of e-cigarettes, stringent product standards or even bans on e-cigarettes, sometimes with exceptions for use as a tobacco smoking cessation aid. There is a risk that some of these approaches may be challenged as a restriction of rights that are protected in World Trade Organization agreements, including the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. The authors explain how different types of e-cigarette regulations engage protection under international trade rules and offer recommendations for how states can formulate public health justifications that ensure these regulations do not breach international trade rules. The authors also recommend that states work toward international consensus or guidelines, which can support the legitimacy of e-cigarette regulations in the event of a challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-059004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special communication provides recommendations for policymakers on how to regulate electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) without violating international trade rules. Concerns are increasing that e-cigarette consumption poses serious harms to health, prompting a recent call to action from the WHO for regulations to lower the appeal of e-cigarettes and address the threat they pose to global populations. Despite this call, no agreement on an appropriate regulatory approach has been reached between the parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control or in any other multilateral forum. In the absence of multilateral consensus, states have implemented a diverse range of frameworks, including restrictions on packaging, marketing and advertising of e-cigarettes, stringent product standards or even bans on e-cigarettes, sometimes with exceptions for use as a tobacco smoking cessation aid. There is a risk that some of these approaches may be challenged as a restriction of rights that are protected in World Trade Organization agreements, including the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. The authors explain how different types of e-cigarette regulations engage protection under international trade rules and offer recommendations for how states can formulate public health justifications that ensure these regulations do not breach international trade rules. The authors also recommend that states work toward international consensus or guidelines, which can support the legitimacy of e-cigarette regulations in the event of a challenge.

贸易法与有效电子烟监管设计。
本特别通讯就如何在不违反国际贸易规则的情况下管理电子烟(电子烟)向政策制定者提供建议。人们越来越担心电子烟消费会对健康造成严重危害,这促使世卫组织最近呼吁采取行动,制定法规,降低电子烟的吸引力,并解决它们对全球人口构成的威胁。尽管发出了这一呼吁,但《世卫组织烟草控制框架公约》缔约方之间或任何其他多边论坛尚未就适当的监管方法达成协议。在缺乏多边共识的情况下,各国实施了各种各样的框架,包括限制电子烟的包装、营销和广告,严格的产品标准,甚至禁止电子烟,有时作为戒烟辅助工具使用也有例外。有一种风险是,其中一些办法可能会受到挑战,被认为是对世界贸易组织协定所保护的权利的限制,这些协定包括《技术性贸易壁垒协定》、《关税及贸易总协定》和《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》。作者解释了不同类型的电子烟法规是如何根据国际贸易规则提供保护的,并就各国如何制定公共卫生理由,确保这些法规不违反国际贸易规则提出了建议。作者还建议各国努力达成国际共识或指导方针,这可以在遇到挑战时支持电子烟法规的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信