How Do People Perceive Media-Reported Risks: Risk Networks and Profiles of Segments.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1111/risa.70090
Chia-Wen Wang, Tra Thi Trinh, Carolyn J Lo, Olivia Jensen, Reuben Ng, Leonard Lee, Yiyun Shou
{"title":"How Do People Perceive Media-Reported Risks: Risk Networks and Profiles of Segments.","authors":"Chia-Wen Wang, Tra Thi Trinh, Carolyn J Lo, Olivia Jensen, Reuben Ng, Leonard Lee, Yiyun Shou","doi":"10.1111/risa.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals' perceptions of and responses to different risk sources are often intercorrelated, particularly for risks belonging to the same domain such as health or finance. However, less is known about the nature of the interconnections of risk perceptions across domains and individual differences in the interconnection patterns. This study examined the perceptions of 13 major media-reported risks and their interconnection patterns across demographic groups. The study also explored whether the perceptions were associated with different population profiles. The study involved 2124 residents in Singapore who completed a cross-sectional survey study in 2023. Network analyses revealed that participants' risk perceptions clustered based on risk domains. The clustering pattern was not associated with the prevalence of experienced harm from the risks for the sampled population. The clustering patterns were mostly consistent across risk targets-who is at risk, that is, oneself or people in Singapore, genders, and age groups. Furthermore, latent profile analysis identified three classes (Invariant Risk Non-Alert, Selective Risk Alert, and Invariant Risk Alert) with distinct risk perception profiles, which were significantly different in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics. These latent profile results suggest that individuals' overall risk sensitivity is driven more by personal attributes than by the characteristics of the risks. The findings of this study offer potential implications for the design of risk communication strategies in Singapore. This study also provides insights for cross-country research on risk perception across different domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals' perceptions of and responses to different risk sources are often intercorrelated, particularly for risks belonging to the same domain such as health or finance. However, less is known about the nature of the interconnections of risk perceptions across domains and individual differences in the interconnection patterns. This study examined the perceptions of 13 major media-reported risks and their interconnection patterns across demographic groups. The study also explored whether the perceptions were associated with different population profiles. The study involved 2124 residents in Singapore who completed a cross-sectional survey study in 2023. Network analyses revealed that participants' risk perceptions clustered based on risk domains. The clustering pattern was not associated with the prevalence of experienced harm from the risks for the sampled population. The clustering patterns were mostly consistent across risk targets-who is at risk, that is, oneself or people in Singapore, genders, and age groups. Furthermore, latent profile analysis identified three classes (Invariant Risk Non-Alert, Selective Risk Alert, and Invariant Risk Alert) with distinct risk perception profiles, which were significantly different in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics. These latent profile results suggest that individuals' overall risk sensitivity is driven more by personal attributes than by the characteristics of the risks. The findings of this study offer potential implications for the design of risk communication strategies in Singapore. This study also provides insights for cross-country research on risk perception across different domains.

人们如何感知媒体报道的风险:风险网络和细分市场的概况。
个人对不同风险源的看法和反应往往是相互关联的,特别是对于属于同一领域的风险,如卫生或金融。然而,人们对跨领域风险感知的相互联系的性质和相互联系模式中的个体差异知之甚少。本研究调查了13种主要媒体报道的风险及其在人口群体中的相互联系模式。该研究还探讨了这些认知是否与不同的人口状况有关。这项研究涉及2124名新加坡居民,他们在2023年完成了一项横断面调查研究。网络分析显示,参与者的风险感知基于风险域聚类。聚类模式与样本人群的风险伤害发生率无关。聚类模式在风险目标之间基本一致——谁有风险,即自己或新加坡人、性别和年龄组。此外,潜在特征分析确定了具有不同风险感知特征的三个类别(不变风险非警报,选择性风险警报和不变风险警报),它们在社会人口统计学特征方面存在显着差异。这些潜在特征的结果表明,个体的整体风险敏感性更多地是由个人属性驱动的,而不是由风险特征驱动的。本研究的结果为新加坡风险沟通策略的设计提供了潜在的启示。本研究也为跨领域风险认知的跨国研究提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信