Therapist personality factors as predictors of between-therapist effectiveness differences.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1037/pst0000591
Michael J Constantino, Averi N Gaines, Alice E Coyne, Henricus L Van, Anuj H P Mehta, Jaap Peen, Frank J Don, Jack J M Dekker, Ellen Driessen
{"title":"Therapist personality factors as predictors of between-therapist effectiveness differences.","authors":"Michael J Constantino, Averi N Gaines, Alice E Coyne, Henricus L Van, Anuj H P Mehta, Jaap Peen, Frank J Don, Jack J M Dekker, Ellen Driessen","doi":"10.1037/pst0000591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abundant research across various treatments indicates that therapists can differ in their general, caseload-level effectiveness. However, relatively little is known about therapist factors that predict such \"performance\" variability. Moreover, most of the limited existing work on this topic has relied on demographic and professional convenience variables, which have demonstrated low predictive power. Thus, it is possible that therapist effectiveness differences would be better explained by personality characteristics that are inescapably present in a clinician's work. Addressing this question, the present preregistered study preliminarily explored whether more versus less effective therapists possess more adaptive personality traits among the \"big five,\" defense style maturity, and psychological mindedness. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 16 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for depression (Driessen et al., 2013). Effective sample participants were 142 adult outpatients treated by 32 therapists nested within the treatment condition. Therapists completed multiple personality measures, and patients' depression and global distress symptoms were assessed (via self-report or observer ratings) at baseline and posttreatment. Despite there being significant between-therapist effectiveness differences (on their average patient's posttreatment outcome), multilevel models revealed no significant associations between personality characteristics and such differences on any outcome. It may be that therapists' overall effectiveness has more to do with their transferable actions <i>in the room</i> versus traits they bring into their work. Alternatively, certain traits may predict between-therapist effects but only in specific treatment, patient, and/or cultural contexts that differ from the ones herein. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abundant research across various treatments indicates that therapists can differ in their general, caseload-level effectiveness. However, relatively little is known about therapist factors that predict such "performance" variability. Moreover, most of the limited existing work on this topic has relied on demographic and professional convenience variables, which have demonstrated low predictive power. Thus, it is possible that therapist effectiveness differences would be better explained by personality characteristics that are inescapably present in a clinician's work. Addressing this question, the present preregistered study preliminarily explored whether more versus less effective therapists possess more adaptive personality traits among the "big five," defense style maturity, and psychological mindedness. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 16 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for depression (Driessen et al., 2013). Effective sample participants were 142 adult outpatients treated by 32 therapists nested within the treatment condition. Therapists completed multiple personality measures, and patients' depression and global distress symptoms were assessed (via self-report or observer ratings) at baseline and posttreatment. Despite there being significant between-therapist effectiveness differences (on their average patient's posttreatment outcome), multilevel models revealed no significant associations between personality characteristics and such differences on any outcome. It may be that therapists' overall effectiveness has more to do with their transferable actions in the room versus traits they bring into their work. Alternatively, certain traits may predict between-therapist effects but only in specific treatment, patient, and/or cultural contexts that differ from the ones herein. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

治疗师人格因素作为治疗师效能差异的预测因子。
对各种治疗方法的大量研究表明,治疗师在一般情况下的工作量水平上的有效性可能有所不同。然而,对预测这种“表现”可变性的治疗师因素所知相对较少。此外,关于该主题的大多数有限的现有工作都依赖于人口统计和专业便利变量,这些变量显示出较低的预测能力。因此,临床医生工作中不可避免地存在的人格特征可能会更好地解释治疗师有效性的差异。针对这一问题,本预注册研究初步探讨了在“五大”、防御风格成熟度和心理心态中,更有效的治疗师与更不有效的治疗师是否具有更多的适应性人格特征。数据来源于一项随机临床试验,比较了16次认知行为疗法和心理动力疗法对抑郁症的疗效(Driessen et al., 2013)。有效样本参与者为142名成年门诊患者,由32名治疗师在治疗条件内嵌套治疗。治疗师完成多重人格测量,并在基线和治疗后评估患者的抑郁和整体困扰症状(通过自我报告或观察者评分)。尽管治疗师之间存在显著的有效性差异(在他们的平均患者治疗后结果上),但多层次模型显示人格特征与任何结果的差异之间没有显著的关联。也许,治疗师的整体有效性更多地与他们在房间里的可转移行为有关,而不是他们在工作中带来的特质。或者,某些特征可以预测治疗师之间的效果,但仅在特定的治疗、患者和/或与本文不同的文化背景下。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信