Effects of naturalistic doses of cannabis edibles on cognition and association with blood THC.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Patricia Di Ciano, Sampson Zhao, Pamela Kaduri, Siddhi Patel, Kruti Bhakta, Christine M Wickens, Sheng Chen, Bernard Le Foll, Bruna Brands
{"title":"Effects of naturalistic doses of cannabis edibles on cognition and association with blood THC.","authors":"Patricia Di Ciano, Sampson Zhao, Pamela Kaduri, Siddhi Patel, Kruti Bhakta, Christine M Wickens, Sheng Chen, Bernard Le Foll, Bruna Brands","doi":"10.1007/s00213-025-06863-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoked cannabis is known to have effects on cognitive function. The use of edibles is on the rise yet there are few studies of the effects of edibles on cognitive function. Further, most studies of cannabis used fixed laboratory doses which may not capture some of the nuances of more naturalistic doses. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the psychoactive component of cannabis yet the relationship of blood THC to cognitive performance is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present observational study participants (n = 22) were invited to the lab to use their regular legally sourced cannabis edibles. At 150 and 270 min after ingesting the edible, measures of learning and memory (verbal free recall task), executive function (trail making test) and functional vision and visual attention (useful field of view test) were taken. Subjective experiences were also measured, and blood THC was correlated with cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 150 min after taking a cannabis edible (mean 7.3 ± 2.9 mg of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) decreases were seen in performance on two measures of the verbal free recall. No effects were found on the useful field of view and trail making tests. There were significant increases in subjective experiences as assessed with a visual analog scale and the Addiction Research Centre Inventory; some changes were also seen on the Profile of Mood States. Blood THC was not correlated with any cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In sum, the present results suggest that people who choose to use relatively low doses of cannabis edibles may experience decrements in cognitive function while experiencing intoxication.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-025-06863-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Smoked cannabis is known to have effects on cognitive function. The use of edibles is on the rise yet there are few studies of the effects of edibles on cognitive function. Further, most studies of cannabis used fixed laboratory doses which may not capture some of the nuances of more naturalistic doses. Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the psychoactive component of cannabis yet the relationship of blood THC to cognitive performance is unclear.

Methods: In the present observational study participants (n = 22) were invited to the lab to use their regular legally sourced cannabis edibles. At 150 and 270 min after ingesting the edible, measures of learning and memory (verbal free recall task), executive function (trail making test) and functional vision and visual attention (useful field of view test) were taken. Subjective experiences were also measured, and blood THC was correlated with cognitive outcomes.

Results: At 150 min after taking a cannabis edible (mean 7.3 ± 2.9 mg of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) decreases were seen in performance on two measures of the verbal free recall. No effects were found on the useful field of view and trail making tests. There were significant increases in subjective experiences as assessed with a visual analog scale and the Addiction Research Centre Inventory; some changes were also seen on the Profile of Mood States. Blood THC was not correlated with any cognitive outcomes.

Conclusions: In sum, the present results suggest that people who choose to use relatively low doses of cannabis edibles may experience decrements in cognitive function while experiencing intoxication.

食用天然剂量大麻对认知的影响及其与血液中四氢大麻酚的关联。
背景:众所周知,吸食大麻对认知功能有影响。食用食品的使用呈上升趋势,但很少有关于食用食品对认知功能影响的研究。此外,大多数关于大麻的研究使用了固定的实验室剂量,这可能无法捕捉到更自然剂量的一些细微差别。δ -9-四氢大麻酚(THC)是大麻的精神活性成分,但血液中THC与认知能力的关系尚不清楚。方法:在目前的观察性研究中,参与者(n = 22)被邀请到实验室使用他们常规的合法来源的大麻食品。进食后150 min和270 min分别进行学习记忆(言语自由回忆任务)、执行功能(轨迹测试)和功能视觉和视觉注意(有用视野测试)测试。主观体验也被测量,血液中四氢大麻酚与认知结果相关。结果:在服用可食用大麻后150分钟(平均7.3±2.9 mg -9-四氢大麻酚),两项言语自由回忆的表现均有所下降。没有发现对有用的视野和轨迹制作测试的影响。通过视觉模拟量表和成瘾研究中心量表评估,主观体验显著增加;在情绪状态资料上也看到了一些变化。血液中四氢大麻酚与任何认知结果无关。结论:总之,目前的结果表明,选择使用相对低剂量的大麻食品的人在经历中毒时可能会出现认知功能下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology
Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS) Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields: Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects. Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信