Tricia M Raquepo, Micaela Tobin, Shreyas Puducheri, Mohammed Yamin, Jannat Dhillon, Matthew Bridgeman, Ryan P Cauley
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Microsurgical Education: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Training Surgeons.","authors":"Tricia M Raquepo, Micaela Tobin, Shreyas Puducheri, Mohammed Yamin, Jannat Dhillon, Matthew Bridgeman, Ryan P Cauley","doi":"10.1055/a-2672-0260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microsurgery is associated with a steep learning curve that requires extensive training through supervised surgeries, cadaver practice, and simulations. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education offers a new potential avenue for microsurgery training by providing real-time feedback, performance analytics, and advanced simulation. This study aims to evaluate the scope, implementation, and outcomes of AI in microsurgical education for trainees across all levels.A systematic review was performed in October 2024 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis with extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Four databases, including Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, returned 3,323 citations. Inclusion criteria were studies investigating the use of AI in the medical education of microsurgical trainees. Abstracts, commentaries, editorials, systematic reviews, and non-English studies were excluded. After two-stage screening, a total of 16 studies were included in this review.The assessed AI interventions appeared in the following number of studies: Computer Vision (<i>n</i> = 13), Sensor-Driven Models (<i>n</i> = 2), Classical/Statistical Machine Learning (<i>n</i> = 4), Task-Specific Neural Networks (<i>n</i> = 4), Transfer Learning of Neural Networks (<i>n</i> = 3), Zero-Shot Inference of Pretrained Models (<i>n</i> = 5), Augmented/Virtual Reality (<i>n</i> = 5), and Anatomical Landmark Tracking (<i>n</i> = 5). Upon full data extraction, three overarching themes were identified among studies: (1) Objective Assessment of Microsurgical Skills, (2) Innovations in Microsurgical Education Materials, and (3) Improvement of Surgeon Workload and Performance. AI improved skill assessment (accuracy: 0.74-0.99), training, and workload optimization. AI-enhanced microsurgical training reduced training time (<i>p</i> = 0.015), improved ergonomics, and minimized cognitive load, accelerating learning (β = 0.86 vs. β = 0.25).AI has transformative potential in microsurgical education and practice, as emphasized by its capacity to enhance skill assessment, educational tools, and ergonomic support. Despite these enhancements, additional work is needed to address challenges such as data bias, standardization, and real-world implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2672-0260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microsurgery is associated with a steep learning curve that requires extensive training through supervised surgeries, cadaver practice, and simulations. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education offers a new potential avenue for microsurgery training by providing real-time feedback, performance analytics, and advanced simulation. This study aims to evaluate the scope, implementation, and outcomes of AI in microsurgical education for trainees across all levels.A systematic review was performed in October 2024 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis with extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Four databases, including Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, returned 3,323 citations. Inclusion criteria were studies investigating the use of AI in the medical education of microsurgical trainees. Abstracts, commentaries, editorials, systematic reviews, and non-English studies were excluded. After two-stage screening, a total of 16 studies were included in this review.The assessed AI interventions appeared in the following number of studies: Computer Vision (n = 13), Sensor-Driven Models (n = 2), Classical/Statistical Machine Learning (n = 4), Task-Specific Neural Networks (n = 4), Transfer Learning of Neural Networks (n = 3), Zero-Shot Inference of Pretrained Models (n = 5), Augmented/Virtual Reality (n = 5), and Anatomical Landmark Tracking (n = 5). Upon full data extraction, three overarching themes were identified among studies: (1) Objective Assessment of Microsurgical Skills, (2) Innovations in Microsurgical Education Materials, and (3) Improvement of Surgeon Workload and Performance. AI improved skill assessment (accuracy: 0.74-0.99), training, and workload optimization. AI-enhanced microsurgical training reduced training time (p = 0.015), improved ergonomics, and minimized cognitive load, accelerating learning (β = 0.86 vs. β = 0.25).AI has transformative potential in microsurgical education and practice, as emphasized by its capacity to enhance skill assessment, educational tools, and ergonomic support. Despite these enhancements, additional work is needed to address challenges such as data bias, standardization, and real-world implementation.
显微外科与陡峭的学习曲线相关,需要通过监督手术,尸体实践和模拟进行广泛的培训。人工智能(AI)在医学教育中的出现,通过提供实时反馈、性能分析和高级模拟,为显微外科培训提供了新的潜在途径。本研究旨在评估人工智能在各级培训生显微外科教育中的范围、实施和结果。方法于2024年10月按照系统评价和扩展范围评价的meta分析(PRISMA-ScR)指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。四个数据库,包括Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,返回了3323条引用。纳入标准是调查人工智能在显微外科受训者医学教育中的应用。摘要、评论、社论、系统评价和非英语研究被排除在外。经过两阶段筛选,本综述共纳入16项研究。评估的人工智能干预出现在以下数量的研究中:计算机视觉(n=13)、传感器驱动模型(n=2)、经典/统计机器学习(n=4)、特定任务神经网络(n=4)、神经网络迁移学习(n=3)、预训练模型的零射击推理(n=5)、增强/虚拟现实(n=5)和解剖地标跟踪(n=5)。在充分提取数据的基础上,研究确定了三个主要主题:1)显微外科技能的客观评估;2)显微外科教材的创新;3)外科医生工作量和表现的改善。人工智能改进了技能评估(准确率:0.74-0.99)、培训和工作量优化。人工智能增强的显微外科训练减少了训练时间(p=0.015),改善了人体工程学,最小化了认知负荷,加速了学习(β=0.86 vs. β=0.25)。结论人工智能在显微外科教育和实践中具有变革性的潜力,特别是在技能评估、教育工具和人机工程学支持方面。尽管有这些增强,但还需要做更多的工作来解决数据偏差、标准化和实际实现等挑战。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.