{"title":"Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) and Outcome of Children with Pediatric Septic Shock.","authors":"K V Vikas, Arnab Biswas, Moumita Samanta","doi":"10.1007/s13312-025-00130-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) in predicting outcomes for pediatric sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A one-year prospective observational study in a tertiary level pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), enrolled children (1 month to 12 years) with fluid-refractory septic shock. VIS and aggregate VIS (AVIS) was calculated at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-hospitalization. The primary outcome assessed was mortality and secondary outcomes included duration of PICU stay, ventilation and inotrope support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety (64.4% male) patients with median (Q1, Q3) age of 24 [6, 60] months were enrolled. The median (Q1, Q3) duration of PICU stay (days) among survivors (n = 32) was significantly shorter 9 (7, 12) compared to non-survivors (n = 58) was 13 (9, 16) (P < 0.001). Significant correlations were found between AVIS at 96 h (AVIS96) and lactate levels (r = 0.79, P < 0.001), duration of inotrope support (r = 0.73, P < 0.001), and duration of ventilation (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). An AVIS96 cutoff of ≥ 25.4 showed high accuracy for mortality prediction (AUC 0.976, sensitivity 95%, specificity 90%), outperforming pSOFA and lactate levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VIS is a reliable predictor of outcomes in pediatric septic shock, with potential for early risk stratification. An AVIS96 cut-off value of 25.4 showed maximum diagnostic accuracy in terms of mortality prediction in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"732-737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-025-00130-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) in predicting outcomes for pediatric sepsis.
Methods: A one-year prospective observational study in a tertiary level pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), enrolled children (1 month to 12 years) with fluid-refractory septic shock. VIS and aggregate VIS (AVIS) was calculated at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-hospitalization. The primary outcome assessed was mortality and secondary outcomes included duration of PICU stay, ventilation and inotrope support.
Results: Ninety (64.4% male) patients with median (Q1, Q3) age of 24 [6, 60] months were enrolled. The median (Q1, Q3) duration of PICU stay (days) among survivors (n = 32) was significantly shorter 9 (7, 12) compared to non-survivors (n = 58) was 13 (9, 16) (P < 0.001). Significant correlations were found between AVIS at 96 h (AVIS96) and lactate levels (r = 0.79, P < 0.001), duration of inotrope support (r = 0.73, P < 0.001), and duration of ventilation (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). An AVIS96 cutoff of ≥ 25.4 showed high accuracy for mortality prediction (AUC 0.976, sensitivity 95%, specificity 90%), outperforming pSOFA and lactate levels.
Conclusion: VIS is a reliable predictor of outcomes in pediatric septic shock, with potential for early risk stratification. An AVIS96 cut-off value of 25.4 showed maximum diagnostic accuracy in terms of mortality prediction in this cohort.
期刊介绍:
The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are:
-To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health.
-To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research.
-To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics.
-To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.