Internal 40-gauge microneedle drainage for the management of subretinal fluid in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery.

IF 2.4 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Gregor S Reiter, Jenna Krivit, Run Zhou Ye, Raymond Iezzi
{"title":"Internal 40-gauge microneedle drainage for the management of subretinal fluid in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery.","authors":"Gregor S Reiter, Jenna Krivit, Run Zhou Ye, Raymond Iezzi","doi":"10.1186/s40942-025-00709-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe outcomes for internal microneedle drainage for the management of residual subretinal fluid (SRF) during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients undergoing PPV for RRD using a 40-gauge angled and beveled microneedle (Incyto, South Korea) for the aspiration and drainage of SRF during fluid/air exchange. The microneedle is inserted through the neurosensory retina into the bleb of residual SRF, removed from the subretinal space and placed onto the retina or adjacent to the subretinal entry site. Visual acuity (VA) and safety outcomes are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen eyes from 13 patients with a median age (Q1 - Q3) of 61.12 (52.03-63.81) were included. Median visual acuity (VA) at baseline was 0.52 (0.24-0.8) logMAR (approx. 20/66) and significantly improved to 0.1 (0.02-0.26) logMAR (approx. 20/25) at the last available follow-up time point (p = 0.0167). Macula-off RRD had significantly worse VA at baseline 0.58 (0.3-1.0) logMAR (approx. 20/76) compared to macula-on RRD 0.15 (0.105-0.25) logMAR (approx. 20/28), p = 0.0196) but improved significantly to the last available follow-up (p = 0.0391), matching those with macula-on RRD. The use of microneedle drainage was safe and resulted in an attached retina in all 13 (100%) cases without adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microneedle drainage is safe, while patient outcomes are excellent. The complete aspiration of SRF might reduce complications associated with PPV for RRD and optimize visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":"11 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00709-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe outcomes for internal microneedle drainage for the management of residual subretinal fluid (SRF) during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing PPV for RRD using a 40-gauge angled and beveled microneedle (Incyto, South Korea) for the aspiration and drainage of SRF during fluid/air exchange. The microneedle is inserted through the neurosensory retina into the bleb of residual SRF, removed from the subretinal space and placed onto the retina or adjacent to the subretinal entry site. Visual acuity (VA) and safety outcomes are reported.

Results: Thirteen eyes from 13 patients with a median age (Q1 - Q3) of 61.12 (52.03-63.81) were included. Median visual acuity (VA) at baseline was 0.52 (0.24-0.8) logMAR (approx. 20/66) and significantly improved to 0.1 (0.02-0.26) logMAR (approx. 20/25) at the last available follow-up time point (p = 0.0167). Macula-off RRD had significantly worse VA at baseline 0.58 (0.3-1.0) logMAR (approx. 20/76) compared to macula-on RRD 0.15 (0.105-0.25) logMAR (approx. 20/28), p = 0.0196) but improved significantly to the last available follow-up (p = 0.0391), matching those with macula-on RRD. The use of microneedle drainage was safe and resulted in an attached retina in all 13 (100%) cases without adverse events.

Conclusions: Microneedle drainage is safe, while patient outcomes are excellent. The complete aspiration of SRF might reduce complications associated with PPV for RRD and optimize visual outcomes.

孔源性视网膜脱离手术中40针内引流处理视网膜下积液。
目的:描述在玻璃体切除(PPV)治疗孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)时,微针内引流治疗视网膜下积液(SRF)的结果。方法:回顾性分析接受PPV治疗RRD的患者,在液/气交换期间使用40号角度和斜面微针(Incyto,韩国)吸入和引流SRF。微针通过神经感觉视网膜插入残余SRF的气泡,从视网膜下间隙取出并放置在视网膜上或靠近视网膜下进入部位。报告了视力(VA)和安全性结果。结果:纳入13例患者13只眼,中位年龄(Q1 - Q3)为61.12(52.03-63.81)。基线时的中位视敏度(VA)为0.52 (0.24-0.8)logMAR(约。20/66),并显著提高到0.1 (0.02-0.26)logMAR(约为0.66)。20/25)在最后可随访时间点(p = 0.0167)。黄斑off RRD的VA基线值为0.58 (0.3-1.0)logMAR(约为0.58)。20/76),与斑疹上的RRD 0.15 (0.105-0.25) logMAR(约。20/28), p = 0.0196),但到最后一次随访时显著改善(p = 0.0391),与黄斑上RRD患者相匹配。使用微针引流术是安全的,13例(100%)患者均出现视网膜附着,无不良反应。结论:微针引流是安全的,患者预后良好。SRF的完全抽吸可能会减少RRD患者PPV相关的并发症,并优化视力结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信