Anterior knee laxity and ACL magnetic resonance signals in healthy and ACL-reconstructed knees following exercise.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
L Moretti, M Coviello, G Maccagnano, G D Cassano, A Carlet, E Favilla, B Moretti, G Solarino
{"title":"Anterior knee laxity and ACL magnetic resonance signals in healthy and ACL-reconstructed knees following exercise.","authors":"L Moretti, M Coviello, G Maccagnano, G D Cassano, A Carlet, E Favilla, B Moretti, G Solarino","doi":"10.26355/eurrev_202507_37327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study compared anterior knee laxity and anterior cruciate ligament magnetic resonance signals between healthy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) knees after exercise to verify differences. This research can guide future training to reduce the risk of reinjury.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-four male footballers between June and August 2022 were enrolled in this case-control study. Subjects who underwent ACLR in the previous 3 years (study group) were compared with healthy volunteers (control group). Each group consisted of twenty-seven patients. Data recorded were anterior tibial translation (ATT) expressed in millimeters using an arthrometer and the ratio of ACL to fat tissue signal intensity using magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements were collected at T0 (at rest), T1 (after 40 minutes of linear running of 3.5 miles), and T2 (after 90 minutes of a regular football match).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was observed in demographic pre-analysis features. No difference was indicated between the two groups according to ATT. Conversely, ACL natives demonstrated significant increases in the ratio of ACL to fat tissue signal intensity when compared with ACLR in the three different measurements. Regarding differences within each group, we demonstrated that anterior knee laxity increased in both groups after 90 minutes of a regular football match. The ACL MRI signal did not differ in the study group, but it increased in the control group after exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although exhibiting distinct MRI signals, ACL-reconstructed tendons show similar post-exercise joint laxity as healthy ligaments. Looking ahead, leveraging specific insights could help tailor training sessions for preventive purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12152,"journal":{"name":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","volume":"29 7","pages":"349-355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202507_37327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study compared anterior knee laxity and anterior cruciate ligament magnetic resonance signals between healthy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) knees after exercise to verify differences. This research can guide future training to reduce the risk of reinjury.

Materials and methods: Fifty-four male footballers between June and August 2022 were enrolled in this case-control study. Subjects who underwent ACLR in the previous 3 years (study group) were compared with healthy volunteers (control group). Each group consisted of twenty-seven patients. Data recorded were anterior tibial translation (ATT) expressed in millimeters using an arthrometer and the ratio of ACL to fat tissue signal intensity using magnetic resonance imaging. Measurements were collected at T0 (at rest), T1 (after 40 minutes of linear running of 3.5 miles), and T2 (after 90 minutes of a regular football match).

Results: No statistical difference was observed in demographic pre-analysis features. No difference was indicated between the two groups according to ATT. Conversely, ACL natives demonstrated significant increases in the ratio of ACL to fat tissue signal intensity when compared with ACLR in the three different measurements. Regarding differences within each group, we demonstrated that anterior knee laxity increased in both groups after 90 minutes of a regular football match. The ACL MRI signal did not differ in the study group, but it increased in the control group after exercise.

Conclusions: Although exhibiting distinct MRI signals, ACL-reconstructed tendons show similar post-exercise joint laxity as healthy ligaments. Looking ahead, leveraging specific insights could help tailor training sessions for preventive purposes.

运动后健康和ACL重建膝关节的前膝关节松弛和前交叉韧带磁共振信号。
目的:比较健康膝关节和前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)膝关节运动后的前膝关节松弛度和前交叉韧带磁共振信号,验证其差异。本研究可以指导今后的训练,降低再损伤的风险。材料和方法:在2022年6月至8月期间,54名男子足球运动员参加了这项病例对照研究。将3年内行ACLR的受试者(研究组)与健康志愿者(对照组)进行比较。每组27例。记录的数据是使用关节计以毫米表示的胫骨前平移(ATT)和使用磁共振成像的ACL与脂肪组织信号强度的比值。测量在T0(休息),T1(40分钟的3.5英里直线跑后)和T2(90分钟的常规足球比赛后)收集。结果:人口学预分析特征无统计学差异。根据ATT,两组之间没有差异。相反,在三种不同的测量中,与ACLR相比,ACL原生者的ACL与脂肪组织信号强度之比显着增加。关于每组之间的差异,我们证明了在90分钟的常规足球比赛后,两组的膝关节前侧松弛度都有所增加。前交叉韧带MRI信号在研究组中没有差异,但在运动后的对照组中有所增加。结论:尽管acl重建肌腱表现出不同的MRI信号,但其运动后关节松弛程度与健康韧带相似。展望未来,利用具体的见解可以帮助为预防目的量身定制培训课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
906
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, a fortnightly journal, acts as an information exchange tool on several aspects of medical and pharmacological sciences. It publishes reviews, original articles, and results from original research. The purposes of the Journal are to encourage interdisciplinary discussions and to contribute to the advancement of medicine. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences includes: -Editorials- Reviews- Original articles- Trials- Brief communications- Case reports (only if of particular interest and accompanied by a short review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信