Transversus abdominis plane block using liposomal or bupivacaine hydrochloride with dexmedetomidine provides comparable analgesia to high-dose intravenous buprenorphine in pigs.
Malwina Basinska, Stephanie A Hon, Emily Pearson, Erica Feldman, Rebecca C McOnie, Stephen Parry, Cristina de Miguel Garcia
{"title":"Transversus abdominis plane block using liposomal or bupivacaine hydrochloride with dexmedetomidine provides comparable analgesia to high-dose intravenous buprenorphine in pigs.","authors":"Malwina Basinska, Stephanie A Hon, Emily Pearson, Erica Feldman, Rebecca C McOnie, Stephen Parry, Cristina de Miguel Garcia","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.04.0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks using either liposomal bupivacaine (2.66 mg/kg) expanded with bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCl; 0.5%; 2 mg/kg) or bupivacaine HCl (0.5%; 2 mg/kg), each combined with dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg), for abdominal wall desensitization in pigs compared to high-dose IV buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized, blinded study was conducted in 24 pigs assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: (1) saline TAP block and 0.1 mg/kg IV buprenorphine, (2) TAP block with bupivacaine HCl (0.5%; 2 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg), and (3) TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine (2.66 mg/kg) admixed with bupivacaine HCl (0.5%; 2 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg). Transversus abdominis plane blocks were administered at 0.8 mL/kg/hemiabdomen (1.6 mL/kg total/pig). Skin sensitivity was assessed using forceps testing at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after block using a predefined scoring system. The primary outcome was time to resensitization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All TAP blocks were technically successful. Peak desensitization occurred at 6 hours in all groups. No significant differences in the duration or extent of nociceptive blockade were observed between treatments. This study represents the first in vivo assessment of TAP block efficacy in pigs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liposomal bupivacaine admixed with bupivacaine HCl and dexmedetomidine did not provide prolonged analgesia compared to bupivacaine HCl with dexmedetomidine or high-dose IV buprenorphine.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>TAP blocks may reduce reliance on systemic opioids, supporting opioid-sparing pain management strategies in veterinary medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.04.0130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks using either liposomal bupivacaine (2.66 mg/kg) expanded with bupivacaine hydrochloride (HCl; 0.5%; 2 mg/kg) or bupivacaine HCl (0.5%; 2 mg/kg), each combined with dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg), for abdominal wall desensitization in pigs compared to high-dose IV buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg).
Methods: A prospective, randomized, blinded study was conducted in 24 pigs assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: (1) saline TAP block and 0.1 mg/kg IV buprenorphine, (2) TAP block with bupivacaine HCl (0.5%; 2 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg), and (3) TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine (2.66 mg/kg) admixed with bupivacaine HCl (0.5%; 2 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg). Transversus abdominis plane blocks were administered at 0.8 mL/kg/hemiabdomen (1.6 mL/kg total/pig). Skin sensitivity was assessed using forceps testing at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after block using a predefined scoring system. The primary outcome was time to resensitization.
Results: All TAP blocks were technically successful. Peak desensitization occurred at 6 hours in all groups. No significant differences in the duration or extent of nociceptive blockade were observed between treatments. This study represents the first in vivo assessment of TAP block efficacy in pigs.
Conclusions: Liposomal bupivacaine admixed with bupivacaine HCl and dexmedetomidine did not provide prolonged analgesia compared to bupivacaine HCl with dexmedetomidine or high-dose IV buprenorphine.
Clinical relevance: TAP blocks may reduce reliance on systemic opioids, supporting opioid-sparing pain management strategies in veterinary medicine.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.