Effect of Edaravone Therapy on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Score (ALS-FRS) in Patients of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in Central India: A Retrospective Open Label Study.

IF 2.4 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Priyanka V Kashyap, Dharmendra Singh, Akhiya Nair, Aditi Jaiswal, Vaibhav Pandey
{"title":"Effect of Edaravone Therapy on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Score (ALS-FRS) in Patients of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in Central India: A Retrospective Open Label Study.","authors":"Priyanka V Kashyap, Dharmendra Singh, Akhiya Nair, Aditi Jaiswal, Vaibhav Pandey","doi":"10.1177/09727531251357377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor neurons and is characterised by a diverse range of clinical manifestations. With the understanding of its pathophysiology, many treatments have emerged in last two decades. This study aims to evaluate the impact of intravenous Edaravone on Amyotrophy Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS) scores and patient survival outcomes of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis patients in Central India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted over a span of 2.5 years and included patients diagnosed with definitive or probable ALS, as per the revised El Escorial criteria. The effects of intravenous (IV) Edaravone on ALS-FRS-R scores were compared between two groups: the intervention group (patients who received IV Edaravone) and the non-intervention group (patients who did not receive IV Edaravone). Data collected included demographic details and ALS-FRS-R scores that were recorded at baseline after each treatment cycle, for a total six cycles. These scores were compared with those of the control group at the corresponding time points. Survival outcomes were also evaluated between the two groups and side effect profile of the drug was also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of ALS patients (definitive and probable) were screened, and 62 patients were enrolled, of which 12 were excluded, thus there were 25 ALS patients in the intervention group and 25 patients in the non-intervention group. The two groups were matched for demographic parameters and the ALS-FRS scores were noted at the baseline at each cycle till 6 cycles and compared. It was inferred that the scores were not significant statistically (<i>p</i> > .001) among the two groups, nor did the survival rates vary significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous Edaravone therapy had no beneficial effect on the ALS-FRS score in the intervention group when compared to the non-intervention group, nor did the survival rates improve. Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Edaravone Therapy, ALS FRS Score.</p>","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"09727531251357377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251357377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor neurons and is characterised by a diverse range of clinical manifestations. With the understanding of its pathophysiology, many treatments have emerged in last two decades. This study aims to evaluate the impact of intravenous Edaravone on Amyotrophy Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS) scores and patient survival outcomes of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis patients in Central India.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a span of 2.5 years and included patients diagnosed with definitive or probable ALS, as per the revised El Escorial criteria. The effects of intravenous (IV) Edaravone on ALS-FRS-R scores were compared between two groups: the intervention group (patients who received IV Edaravone) and the non-intervention group (patients who did not receive IV Edaravone). Data collected included demographic details and ALS-FRS-R scores that were recorded at baseline after each treatment cycle, for a total six cycles. These scores were compared with those of the control group at the corresponding time points. Survival outcomes were also evaluated between the two groups and side effect profile of the drug was also noted.

Results: Data of ALS patients (definitive and probable) were screened, and 62 patients were enrolled, of which 12 were excluded, thus there were 25 ALS patients in the intervention group and 25 patients in the non-intervention group. The two groups were matched for demographic parameters and the ALS-FRS scores were noted at the baseline at each cycle till 6 cycles and compared. It was inferred that the scores were not significant statistically (p > .001) among the two groups, nor did the survival rates vary significantly.

Conclusion: Intravenous Edaravone therapy had no beneficial effect on the ALS-FRS score in the intervention group when compared to the non-intervention group, nor did the survival rates improve. Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Edaravone Therapy, ALS FRS Score.

依达拉奉治疗对印度中部肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者功能评分(ALS- frs)的影响:一项回顾性开放标签研究
背景:肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种累及运动神经元的进行性神经退行性疾病,具有多种临床表现。随着对其病理生理学的了解,近二十年来出现了许多治疗方法。本研究旨在评估静脉注射依达拉奉对印度中部肌萎缩侧索硬化症(Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, ALS-FRS)患者功能评定量表(Functional Rating Scale, ALS-FRS)评分和患者生存结局的影响。方法:这项回顾性研究进行了超过2.5年的时间,包括确诊或可能的ALS患者,根据修订的El Escorial标准。比较静脉注射依达拉奉对两组患者ALS-FRS-R评分的影响:干预组(接受静脉注射依达拉奉的患者)和非干预组(未接受静脉注射依达拉奉的患者)。收集的数据包括人口统计细节和ALS-FRS-R评分,这些评分在每个治疗周期后的基线记录,共6个周期。与对照组在相应时间点的得分进行比较。还评估了两组患者的生存结果,并记录了该药的副作用。结果:筛选ALS患者资料(明确和可能),入组62例,排除12例,干预组25例,非干预组25例。两组进行人口统计学参数匹配,并在每个周期的基线记录ALS-FRS评分,直到6个周期并进行比较。推断两组间评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.001),生存率差异无统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:与非干预组相比,静脉注射依达拉奉治疗对干预组ALS-FRS评分无显著影响,生存率无明显提高。关键词:肌萎缩性侧索硬化,依达拉奉治疗,ALS FRS评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信