Annette K. Regan, Liam Bruce, Carolina Lavin Venegas, Eszter Török, Robert W. Platt, Christopher A. Gravel, Gillian D. Alton, Sheryll Dimanlig-Cruz, Prakesh S. Shah, Jon Barrett, Mark C. Walker, Darine El-Chaâr, Kumanan Wilson, Ann E. Sprague, Sarah A. Buchan, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Sarah E. Wilson, Siri E. Håberg, Nannette Okun, Tavleen Dhinsa, Sandra Dunn, Deshayne B. Fell
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination around the time of conception and risk of placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes","authors":"Annette K. Regan, Liam Bruce, Carolina Lavin Venegas, Eszter Török, Robert W. Platt, Christopher A. Gravel, Gillian D. Alton, Sheryll Dimanlig-Cruz, Prakesh S. Shah, Jon Barrett, Mark C. Walker, Darine El-Chaâr, Kumanan Wilson, Ann E. Sprague, Sarah A. Buchan, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Sarah E. Wilson, Siri E. Håberg, Nannette Okun, Tavleen Dhinsa, Sandra Dunn, Deshayne B. Fell","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Although numerous studies have documented no association between COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and maternal and fetal health outcomes, fewer studies have evaluated fetal health effects after COVID-19 vaccination around the time of conception and early pregnancy, a time when maternal exposures may affect early placentation and the subsequent risk of placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used province-wide databases in Ontario to conduct a population-based cohort study including all live and stillbirths ≥20 weeks' gestation with a last menstrual period (LMP) between April 1 and December 31, 2021. We deterministically linked birth registry data to the vaccine registry for all 80 253 eligible pregnancies; 31 209 (38.9%) received ≥1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine around the time of conception or first trimester. Using Cox regression, we estimated propensity score weighted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between ≥1 dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during the periconceptional/first trimester exposure window (28 days before the LMP to the end of first trimester) and study outcomes: hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia), placental abruption, preterm birth (<37 weeks), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth (<10th percentile), and stillbirth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>COVID-19 vaccination around the time of conception or first trimester was associated with a small increased risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in exposed versus unexposed individuals (7.4% vs. 6.1%; aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03–1.17), mostly attributed to gestational hypertension (5.0% vs. 4.1%; aHR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05–1.22). There was no increased risk of preeclampsia (1.8% vs. 1.5%; aHR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95–1.22), eclampsia (0.1% vs. 0.1%; aHR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.65–1.95), placental abruption (0.8% vs. 1.0%; aHR: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.65–0.91), preterm birth (8.0% vs. 8.9%; aHR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.87–0.97), SGA birth (8.9% vs. 9.3%; aHR: 1.00, 95%CI: 0.95–1.06), or stillbirth (0.4% vs. 0.6%; aHR: 0.66, 95%CI: 0.52–0.82).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This population-based Canadian study provides additional evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccine administration around the start of pregnancy. While we identified no association with most placenta-mediated outcomes, we report a slight increase in the rate of gestational hypertension. This could be a true association or attributed to residual confounding. Further research is needed to verify.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"104 10","pages":"1883-1896"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.70025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Although numerous studies have documented no association between COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and maternal and fetal health outcomes, fewer studies have evaluated fetal health effects after COVID-19 vaccination around the time of conception and early pregnancy, a time when maternal exposures may affect early placentation and the subsequent risk of placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Material and Methods
We used province-wide databases in Ontario to conduct a population-based cohort study including all live and stillbirths ≥20 weeks' gestation with a last menstrual period (LMP) between April 1 and December 31, 2021. We deterministically linked birth registry data to the vaccine registry for all 80 253 eligible pregnancies; 31 209 (38.9%) received ≥1 dose of the COVID-19 vaccine around the time of conception or first trimester. Using Cox regression, we estimated propensity score weighted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between ≥1 dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during the periconceptional/first trimester exposure window (28 days before the LMP to the end of first trimester) and study outcomes: hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia), placental abruption, preterm birth (<37 weeks), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth (<10th percentile), and stillbirth.
Results
COVID-19 vaccination around the time of conception or first trimester was associated with a small increased risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in exposed versus unexposed individuals (7.4% vs. 6.1%; aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03–1.17), mostly attributed to gestational hypertension (5.0% vs. 4.1%; aHR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05–1.22). There was no increased risk of preeclampsia (1.8% vs. 1.5%; aHR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.95–1.22), eclampsia (0.1% vs. 0.1%; aHR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.65–1.95), placental abruption (0.8% vs. 1.0%; aHR: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.65–0.91), preterm birth (8.0% vs. 8.9%; aHR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.87–0.97), SGA birth (8.9% vs. 9.3%; aHR: 1.00, 95%CI: 0.95–1.06), or stillbirth (0.4% vs. 0.6%; aHR: 0.66, 95%CI: 0.52–0.82).
Conclusions
This population-based Canadian study provides additional evidence evaluating COVID-19 vaccine administration around the start of pregnancy. While we identified no association with most placenta-mediated outcomes, we report a slight increase in the rate of gestational hypertension. This could be a true association or attributed to residual confounding. Further research is needed to verify.
期刊介绍:
Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.