Zebra stripes: the questions raised by the answers.

IF 11.7 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Hamish M Ireland, Graeme D Ruxton
{"title":"Zebra stripes: the questions raised by the answers.","authors":"Hamish M Ireland, Graeme D Ruxton","doi":"10.1111/brv.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple hypotheses have been suggested to explain why the three zebra species (Equus quagga, E. grevyi and E. zebra) are striped. We review how well these theories explain the nature (rather than simply the existence) of the stripes. Specifically, we explore how well different theories explain (i) the form of zebra stripes (especially on different body parts), (ii) stripe variation between zebra populations and among species, and (iii) the lack of striping in other equids or other large mammalian herbivores. The main hypotheses discussed during the last decade are the deterrence of biting flies, thermoregulation through stripe-generated air movement, and three anti-predation hypotheses: crypsis to avoid detection; dazzle colouration to confuse pursuers; and interspecies signalling to encourage protective mixed-species herding. Our evaluation suggests that these theories struggle to explain all aspects of variation in striping. For each theory we identify where through logical reasoning or empirical data, the theory is unable to account for an aspect of variation, or whether information is currently lacking. In the latter case we offer concrete suggestions for the types of empirical study that would be most useful. Deterrence of biting flies is the theory that currently has strongest empirical support, but this theory alone struggles to explain why striping occurs so strongly in zebra but not in other African mammals, and the distribution of stripes across the body. These aspects can be explained by the interspecies signalling theory, but this theory has not been empirically evaluated. We suggest how future studies could best utilise our framework to close the most pressing knowledge gaps in our understanding of this iconic example of animal colouration.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple hypotheses have been suggested to explain why the three zebra species (Equus quagga, E. grevyi and E. zebra) are striped. We review how well these theories explain the nature (rather than simply the existence) of the stripes. Specifically, we explore how well different theories explain (i) the form of zebra stripes (especially on different body parts), (ii) stripe variation between zebra populations and among species, and (iii) the lack of striping in other equids or other large mammalian herbivores. The main hypotheses discussed during the last decade are the deterrence of biting flies, thermoregulation through stripe-generated air movement, and three anti-predation hypotheses: crypsis to avoid detection; dazzle colouration to confuse pursuers; and interspecies signalling to encourage protective mixed-species herding. Our evaluation suggests that these theories struggle to explain all aspects of variation in striping. For each theory we identify where through logical reasoning or empirical data, the theory is unable to account for an aspect of variation, or whether information is currently lacking. In the latter case we offer concrete suggestions for the types of empirical study that would be most useful. Deterrence of biting flies is the theory that currently has strongest empirical support, but this theory alone struggles to explain why striping occurs so strongly in zebra but not in other African mammals, and the distribution of stripes across the body. These aspects can be explained by the interspecies signalling theory, but this theory has not been empirically evaluated. We suggest how future studies could best utilise our framework to close the most pressing knowledge gaps in our understanding of this iconic example of animal colouration.

斑马条纹:由答案引发的问题。
人们提出了多种假设来解释为什么三种斑马(斑马科斑马、格里维斑马和斑马)身上有条纹。我们回顾了这些理论如何很好地解释了条纹的性质(而不仅仅是存在)。具体来说,我们探讨了不同的理论如何解释(i)斑马条纹的形式(特别是在不同的身体部位),(ii)斑马种群之间和物种之间的条纹变化,以及(iii)其他马科动物或其他大型食草哺乳动物缺乏条纹。在过去十年中讨论的主要假设是对叮咬苍蝇的威慑,通过条纹产生的空气运动进行体温调节,以及三种反捕食假设:隐藏以避免被发现;炫目色彩迷惑追踪者;以及物种间的信号,以鼓励保护性的物种混合放牧。我们的评估表明,这些理论很难解释条纹变异的所有方面。对于每一个理论,我们通过逻辑推理或经验数据确定,该理论无法解释变化的一个方面,或者是否目前缺乏信息。在后一种情况下,我们为最有用的实证研究类型提供具体建议。阻止苍蝇叮咬是目前最具实证支持的理论,但这个理论本身很难解释为什么斑马身上的条纹如此强烈,而在其他非洲哺乳动物身上却没有,以及条纹在全身的分布。这些方面可以用种间信号理论来解释,但这一理论尚未得到实证评估。我们建议未来的研究如何最好地利用我们的框架来填补我们对动物着色这一标志性例子的理解中最紧迫的知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信