{"title":"A Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment: Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial","authors":"Na Li, Zhixin Yang, Quan Yuan, Wenli Cheng","doi":"10.1111/jch.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current hypertension guidelines lack personalized strategies for blood pressure control. While the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering, identifying optimal candidates for such treatment remains challenging. We developed and validated a risk stratification model using data from 9139 SPRINT participants. The model incorporated 11 clinical variables through multivariable Cox regression analysis. Patients were stratified into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01206062). The model showed good discrimination with C-indices of 0.7354 (95% CI: 0.7065–0.7710) and 0.6894 (95% CI: 0.6545–0.7266) at 3 years for training and validation sets, respectively. Intensive treatment significantly reduced cardiovascular events in medium-risk (3.17% vs. 5.11%, <i>p</i> = 0.0376) and high-risk groups (9.34% vs. 11.86%, <i>p</i> = 0.0269), while showing a nonsignificant trend in the low-risk group (2.87% vs. 3.34%, <i>p</i> = 0.0870). The Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effect analysis (16.06) supported potential benefits from individualized treatment allocation. No increased risk of severe adverse events was observed across risk groups. Our risk stratification model effectively identifies patients who derive significant cardiovascular benefits from intensive blood pressure lowering, particularly in medium- and high-risk groups. This approach could guide more personalized hypertension management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Current hypertension guidelines lack personalized strategies for blood pressure control. While the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering, identifying optimal candidates for such treatment remains challenging. We developed and validated a risk stratification model using data from 9139 SPRINT participants. The model incorporated 11 clinical variables through multivariable Cox regression analysis. Patients were stratified into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01206062). The model showed good discrimination with C-indices of 0.7354 (95% CI: 0.7065–0.7710) and 0.6894 (95% CI: 0.6545–0.7266) at 3 years for training and validation sets, respectively. Intensive treatment significantly reduced cardiovascular events in medium-risk (3.17% vs. 5.11%, p = 0.0376) and high-risk groups (9.34% vs. 11.86%, p = 0.0269), while showing a nonsignificant trend in the low-risk group (2.87% vs. 3.34%, p = 0.0870). The Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effect analysis (16.06) supported potential benefits from individualized treatment allocation. No increased risk of severe adverse events was observed across risk groups. Our risk stratification model effectively identifies patients who derive significant cardiovascular benefits from intensive blood pressure lowering, particularly in medium- and high-risk groups. This approach could guide more personalized hypertension management strategies.
目前的高血压指南缺乏个性化的血压控制策略。虽然收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)证明了强化降压的益处,但确定这种治疗的最佳候选药物仍然具有挑战性。我们利用9139名SPRINT参与者的数据建立并验证了风险分层模型。通过多变量Cox回归分析,纳入11个临床变量。患者被分为低、中、高风险组。该研究方案已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT01206062)。该模型在训练集和验证集的3年c指数分别为0.7354 (95% CI: 0.7065-0.7710)和0.6894 (95% CI: 0.6545-0.7266),具有良好的判别性。强化治疗显著降低了中危组(3.17% vs. 5.11%, p = 0.0376)和高危组(9.34% vs. 11.86%, p = 0.0269)的心血管事件,而低危组(2.87% vs. 3.34%, p = 0.0870)的趋势不显著。排序加权平均治疗效果分析(16.06)支持个体化治疗分配的潜在益处。各风险组均未观察到严重不良事件的风险增加。我们的风险分层模型有效地识别了从强化降压中获得显著心血管益处的患者,特别是在中等和高危人群中。这种方法可以指导更个性化的高血压管理策略。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.