Relatedness-Based Industrial Exit Paths and Economic Complexity: Evidence From Chinese Regions

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Wei Li, Yiming Fu, Zhen Liu, Ying Wu
{"title":"Relatedness-Based Industrial Exit Paths and Economic Complexity: Evidence From Chinese Regions","authors":"Wei Li,&nbsp;Yiming Fu,&nbsp;Zhen Liu,&nbsp;Ying Wu","doi":"10.1111/grow.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Industrial exit plays a critical role in shaping regional industrial dynamics. Evolutionary economic geography studies often use co-occurrence and density methods to assess the likelihood of related and unrelated industries exiting a region. However, these traditional methods lack the ability to quantitatively distinguish related from unrelated exiting industries. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a novel quantitative method for differentiating related and unrelated exiting industries. We then explore the correlation between (un)related exits and economic complexity using data from the China Customs Database (2000–2012). The findings suggest that related exits dominate China's industrial exit paths, with relatively few unrelated exits, and the disparity between them is widening. Second, a significant and positive correlation between related exits and economic complexity is observed, while unrelated exits display a significant and negative correlation. Third, differences emerge between related and unrelated exits across various sectors and regions in China. The novel method for distinguishing related and unrelated exit industries holds the potential for application in other countries and regions, contributing to a more precise understanding of the patterns of regional industrial exit.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industrial exit plays a critical role in shaping regional industrial dynamics. Evolutionary economic geography studies often use co-occurrence and density methods to assess the likelihood of related and unrelated industries exiting a region. However, these traditional methods lack the ability to quantitatively distinguish related from unrelated exiting industries. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a novel quantitative method for differentiating related and unrelated exiting industries. We then explore the correlation between (un)related exits and economic complexity using data from the China Customs Database (2000–2012). The findings suggest that related exits dominate China's industrial exit paths, with relatively few unrelated exits, and the disparity between them is widening. Second, a significant and positive correlation between related exits and economic complexity is observed, while unrelated exits display a significant and negative correlation. Third, differences emerge between related and unrelated exits across various sectors and regions in China. The novel method for distinguishing related and unrelated exit industries holds the potential for application in other countries and regions, contributing to a more precise understanding of the patterns of regional industrial exit.

基于关联的产业退出路径与经济复杂性:来自中国地区的证据
产业退出对区域产业动态的形成起着至关重要的作用。演化经济地理学研究经常使用共现和密度方法来评估相关和不相关产业退出一个地区的可能性。然而,这些传统的方法缺乏定量区分相关和不相关的现有产业的能力。本文通过引入一种新的量化方法来区分相关和不相关的现有产业,从而解决了这一差距。然后,我们利用中国海关数据库(2000-2012)的数据探讨了(非)相关出口与经济复杂性之间的相关性。研究结果表明,中国产业退出路径中,相关出口占主导地位,不相关出口相对较少,且差距不断扩大。其次,相关出口与经济复杂性呈显著正相关,而不相关出口与经济复杂性呈显著负相关。第三,中国不同行业和地区的相关退出和不相关退出存在差异。这种区分相关和不相关退出产业的新方法具有在其他国家和地区应用的潜力,有助于更准确地理解区域产业退出模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Growth and Change
Growth and Change Multiple-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信