Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Among First-Time Mothers: A Mixed-Methods Study Comparing Spontaneous and Assisted Conceptions in Turkey

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sevcan Özöztürk, Merlinda Aluş Tokat, Hande Aslan
{"title":"Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Among First-Time Mothers: A Mixed-Methods Study Comparing Spontaneous and Assisted Conceptions in Turkey","authors":"Sevcan Özöztürk,&nbsp;Merlinda Aluş Tokat,&nbsp;Hande Aslan","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This mixed-method study aimed to examine the relationship between mode of conception and breastfeeding self-efficacy among first-time mothers in Turkey, comparing outcomes between those who conceived spontaneously and those who conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART). A secondary objective was to explore the lived experiences of women with low breastfeeding self-efficacy in both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, quantitative data were collected from 100 mothers, 50 with spontaneous pregnancies and 50 with ART-conceived pregnancies, using a validated breastfeeding self-efficacy scale. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews were conducted with six mothers who scored low on the scale or reported breastfeeding difficulties. The qualitative component was guided by Dennis' Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Quantitative findings revealed significantly higher breastfeeding self-efficacy scores among mothers with spontaneous pregnancies compared to those who conceived through ART. Qualitative analysis identified key influencing factors such as emotional adjustment to motherhood, perceived social expectations and physical challenges related to breastfeeding. A critical gap in targeted breastfeeding education and postnatal support was noted across both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings underscore the need for individualized, culturally sensitive breastfeeding interventions, particularly for mothers who have conceived through ART. Tailored support strategies addressing both psychological and physical aspects of the postpartum experience may enhance breastfeeding outcomes in this growing population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This mixed-method study aimed to examine the relationship between mode of conception and breastfeeding self-efficacy among first-time mothers in Turkey, comparing outcomes between those who conceived spontaneously and those who conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART). A secondary objective was to explore the lived experiences of women with low breastfeeding self-efficacy in both groups.

Methods

Using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, quantitative data were collected from 100 mothers, 50 with spontaneous pregnancies and 50 with ART-conceived pregnancies, using a validated breastfeeding self-efficacy scale. In the qualitative phase, in-depth interviews were conducted with six mothers who scored low on the scale or reported breastfeeding difficulties. The qualitative component was guided by Dennis' Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Framework.

Results

Quantitative findings revealed significantly higher breastfeeding self-efficacy scores among mothers with spontaneous pregnancies compared to those who conceived through ART. Qualitative analysis identified key influencing factors such as emotional adjustment to motherhood, perceived social expectations and physical challenges related to breastfeeding. A critical gap in targeted breastfeeding education and postnatal support was noted across both groups.

Conclusions

The findings underscore the need for individualized, culturally sensitive breastfeeding interventions, particularly for mothers who have conceived through ART. Tailored support strategies addressing both psychological and physical aspects of the postpartum experience may enhance breastfeeding outcomes in this growing population.

母乳喂养自我效能在第一次母亲:混合方法研究比较自发和辅助概念在土耳其
目的:本混合方法研究旨在研究土耳其首次怀孕母亲的受孕方式与母乳喂养自我效能之间的关系,比较自然受孕和通过辅助生殖技术(ART)受孕的结果。第二个目的是探索两组母乳喂养自我效能低的妇女的生活经历。方法采用探索性序贯混合方法设计,采用经验证的母乳喂养自我效能量表收集100例母亲的定量数据,其中50例为自然妊娠,50例为art妊娠。在定性阶段,对6名得分较低或报告母乳喂养困难的母亲进行了深入访谈。定性部分采用Dennis母乳喂养自我效能框架。结果定量研究结果显示,与通过抗逆转录病毒治疗怀孕的母亲相比,自然怀孕的母亲的母乳喂养自我效能得分明显更高。定性分析确定了关键的影响因素,如对母亲身份的情绪调整、感知到的社会期望和与母乳喂养有关的身体挑战。两组在有针对性的母乳喂养教育和产后支持方面存在严重差距。研究结果强调需要采取个性化的、具有文化敏感性的母乳喂养干预措施,特别是对通过抗逆转录病毒治疗怀孕的母亲。量身定制的支持策略解决产后心理和生理方面的经验,可以提高母乳喂养的结果在这个不断增长的人口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信