Cropping diversity is a main driver of soil health under intensive organic cropping systems

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Stéphanie Lavergne , Caroline Halde , Derek H. Lynch
{"title":"Cropping diversity is a main driver of soil health under intensive organic cropping systems","authors":"Stéphanie Lavergne ,&nbsp;Caroline Halde ,&nbsp;Derek H. Lynch","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ability of organic cropping systems to sustain soil health may vary with management intensity. Little research has examined the impact of varying management practices on soil health within intensive organic field crop production systems. A field survey was conducted in the fall of 2019, 2020, and 2021 on 10 certified organic farms in Québec, Canada. Their cropping systems comprised an intensive three-year maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.)-soybean (<em>Glycine</em> max [L.] Merr.) – small grain (i.e., winter or spring cereals) rotation. On each farm, soil health was measured on the three rotated crop fields in the fall of 2019, 2020, and 2021 (n = 90). The relationships between soil health indicators and indices of management practices were assessed. The 3-year Crop Diversity Index (CDI) ranged from 2 to 16 across the sampled fields, with the highest values observed where cover crops were used annually, and winter cereals were included in the rotation. Soil physical health indicators were positively influenced by higher CDI values. In contrast, higher Soil Tillage Intensity Ratings for tillage (STIR<sub>tillage</sub>) had a negative effect on soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations. Soil health indicators did not vary among crop phases, except for water-stable aggregates (WSA) which was greater in small grain fields (43.5 %) than in soybean fields (33.9 %). The results from this study demonstrated that soil health was positively influenced by increased crop diversity and reduced tillage intensity. These findings will help organic growers choose and refine best management practices to maintain soil health when cropping intensively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"461 ","pages":"Article 117441"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706125002824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability of organic cropping systems to sustain soil health may vary with management intensity. Little research has examined the impact of varying management practices on soil health within intensive organic field crop production systems. A field survey was conducted in the fall of 2019, 2020, and 2021 on 10 certified organic farms in Québec, Canada. Their cropping systems comprised an intensive three-year maize (Zea mays L.)-soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) – small grain (i.e., winter or spring cereals) rotation. On each farm, soil health was measured on the three rotated crop fields in the fall of 2019, 2020, and 2021 (n = 90). The relationships between soil health indicators and indices of management practices were assessed. The 3-year Crop Diversity Index (CDI) ranged from 2 to 16 across the sampled fields, with the highest values observed where cover crops were used annually, and winter cereals were included in the rotation. Soil physical health indicators were positively influenced by higher CDI values. In contrast, higher Soil Tillage Intensity Ratings for tillage (STIRtillage) had a negative effect on soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations. Soil health indicators did not vary among crop phases, except for water-stable aggregates (WSA) which was greater in small grain fields (43.5 %) than in soybean fields (33.9 %). The results from this study demonstrated that soil health was positively influenced by increased crop diversity and reduced tillage intensity. These findings will help organic growers choose and refine best management practices to maintain soil health when cropping intensively.
在集约有机种植制度下,作物多样性是土壤健康的主要驱动因素
有机种植系统维持土壤健康的能力可能因管理强度而异。很少有研究调查了集约化有机农田作物生产系统中不同管理做法对土壤健康的影响。在2019年、2020年和2021年的秋天,对加拿大魁省的10个经过认证的有机农场进行了实地调查。他们的种植系统包括集约化三年期玉米(Zea mays L.)-大豆(Glycine max [L.])。[mr .] -小粒谷物(即冬季或春季谷物)轮作。在每个农场,在2019年、2020年和2021年秋季对三个轮作农田的土壤健康进行了测量(n = 90)。评价了土壤健康指标与管理措施指标之间的关系。3年作物多样性指数(CDI)在2 ~ 16之间,在每年种植覆盖作物和轮作冬粮的地区,CDI值最高。较高的CDI值对土壤物理健康指标有正向影响。相反,较高的耕作强度等级对土壤有机碳(SOC)浓度有负面影响。除水稳性团聚体(WSA)在小粒田(43.5%)高于大豆田(33.9%)外,各作物期土壤健康指标无显著差异。结果表明,增加作物多样性和降低耕作强度对土壤健康有积极影响。这些发现将有助于有机种植者选择和改进最佳管理实践,以在集约种植时保持土壤健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信