Mary Jordan , Abimbola Ayorinde , Iman Ghosh , Junaid Shaikh , Victoria Adetunji , Anna Brown , Ellie Gilham , Daniel Todkill , Diane Ashiru-Oredope
{"title":"Challenges of assessing the cost effectiveness of AMR campaigns: Considerations for policy makers","authors":"Mary Jordan , Abimbola Ayorinde , Iman Ghosh , Junaid Shaikh , Victoria Adetunji , Anna Brown , Ellie Gilham , Daniel Todkill , Diane Ashiru-Oredope","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To provide overview and understanding of the current challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) campaigns and highlight the main considerations for policy makers when evaluating existing and future evidence to inform decision making.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Policy commentary.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A rapid review of cost-effectiveness analyses evaluating public AMR campaigns highlighted significant challenges with existing methodologies which were reviewed extensively in further literature searches to inform overview and commentary.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Longstanding challenges in measuring clinical outcomes for use in economic evaluations and the methodologies available to health economists to evaluate public health campaigns were identified: Identifying and measuring appropriate outcomes, including broader societal impacts, capturing relevant outcomes which result over longer timescales, and accounting for the costs of AMR. These remain significant obstacles in assessing the true cost-effectiveness of interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Little methodological progress has been made in this area over the past 20 years, leaving policy makers in a difficult conundrum when justifying future investment in public campaigns to combat AMR. Evidence of high societal value placed on such interventions suggests future work to establish the cost-effectiveness of public AMR campaigns and support policy making are essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105877"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625003233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To provide overview and understanding of the current challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) campaigns and highlight the main considerations for policy makers when evaluating existing and future evidence to inform decision making.
Study design
Policy commentary.
Methods
A rapid review of cost-effectiveness analyses evaluating public AMR campaigns highlighted significant challenges with existing methodologies which were reviewed extensively in further literature searches to inform overview and commentary.
Results
Longstanding challenges in measuring clinical outcomes for use in economic evaluations and the methodologies available to health economists to evaluate public health campaigns were identified: Identifying and measuring appropriate outcomes, including broader societal impacts, capturing relevant outcomes which result over longer timescales, and accounting for the costs of AMR. These remain significant obstacles in assessing the true cost-effectiveness of interventions.
Conclusions
Little methodological progress has been made in this area over the past 20 years, leaving policy makers in a difficult conundrum when justifying future investment in public campaigns to combat AMR. Evidence of high societal value placed on such interventions suggests future work to establish the cost-effectiveness of public AMR campaigns and support policy making are essential.
期刊介绍:
Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.