Gina McGuire , Alexander Mawyer , James J. Akau , Noelani Puniwai
{"title":"Seaweeds and sovereignty: Governance gaps and self-determination within limu stewardship in Hawai’i","authors":"Gina McGuire , Alexander Mawyer , James J. Akau , Noelani Puniwai","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the subtle place of everyday agency and political sovereignty within coastal resource management and governance of limu (seaweeds) in Hawai’i. It thus responds to recent calls for effective and equitable marine governance recognizing the Indigenous peoples and local communities who steward many of our most ecologically significant and vulnerable coasts. Here we argue for the need to explicitly center political agency within contemporary ocean governance. In Hawaiʻi culturally valued species are subject to diverse risks, governance, and management regimes, Limu exemplify the linked wellbeing of marine species, their environments, and the Indigenous and local communities that depend upon and steward them. Drawing on moʻolelo as method, we identify that community sovereignty over culturally valued species is a key indicator of equitable marine governance and the ecological and community wellbeing that depends, in part, upon it. A systematic analysis of marine management structures was completed for limu and for Kānaka Maoli (Native Hawaiian peoples) agency within administrative rules by marine managed areas, revealing a lack of guidelines for the gathering protocols, bag limits, and seasonal take that are necessary to long-term sustainable gathering of limu communities at the state level. Literature review of existing limu biogeographic research revealed that there is very little known about the archipelago-level statuses of native limu species and what the drivers of declines or abundances may be, further highlighting the potential use of ʻŌiwi (Native) science to complement existing monitoring methods. Attention to the cultural knowledges surrounding limu and Hawaiian wellbeing can inform ocean policy in ways that support higher levels of self-determination and self-governance alongside benefits to species and their ecological futures, and foster beneficial feedback loops supporting coastal wellbeing inclusive of species, ecologies, and Indigenous and local communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines the subtle place of everyday agency and political sovereignty within coastal resource management and governance of limu (seaweeds) in Hawai’i. It thus responds to recent calls for effective and equitable marine governance recognizing the Indigenous peoples and local communities who steward many of our most ecologically significant and vulnerable coasts. Here we argue for the need to explicitly center political agency within contemporary ocean governance. In Hawaiʻi culturally valued species are subject to diverse risks, governance, and management regimes, Limu exemplify the linked wellbeing of marine species, their environments, and the Indigenous and local communities that depend upon and steward them. Drawing on moʻolelo as method, we identify that community sovereignty over culturally valued species is a key indicator of equitable marine governance and the ecological and community wellbeing that depends, in part, upon it. A systematic analysis of marine management structures was completed for limu and for Kānaka Maoli (Native Hawaiian peoples) agency within administrative rules by marine managed areas, revealing a lack of guidelines for the gathering protocols, bag limits, and seasonal take that are necessary to long-term sustainable gathering of limu communities at the state level. Literature review of existing limu biogeographic research revealed that there is very little known about the archipelago-level statuses of native limu species and what the drivers of declines or abundances may be, further highlighting the potential use of ʻŌiwi (Native) science to complement existing monitoring methods. Attention to the cultural knowledges surrounding limu and Hawaiian wellbeing can inform ocean policy in ways that support higher levels of self-determination and self-governance alongside benefits to species and their ecological futures, and foster beneficial feedback loops supporting coastal wellbeing inclusive of species, ecologies, and Indigenous and local communities.
本文考察了日常机构和政治主权在夏威夷沿海资源管理和limu(海藻)治理中的微妙地位。因此,它响应了最近关于有效和公平的海洋治理的呼吁,承认土著人民和当地社区管理着我们许多生态上最重要和最脆弱的海岸。在这里,我们认为有必要明确地将政治机构置于当代海洋治理的中心。在夏威夷,有文化价值的物种受到各种风险、治理和管理制度的影响,Limu体现了海洋物种、环境以及依赖和管理它们的土著和当地社区的福祉。以mo o o olelo为例,我们发现,社区对文化价值物种的主权是公平海洋治理以及部分依赖于此的生态和社区福祉的关键指标。在海洋管理区域的行政规则下,对limu和Kānaka Maoli(夏威夷原住民)机构的海洋管理结构进行了系统分析,揭示了缺乏收集协议、袋限制和季节性捕捞的指导方针,这些都是州一级limu社区长期可持续收集所必需的。对现有limu生物地理研究的文献综述表明,对原生limu物种的群岛水平状况以及减少或丰富的驱动因素知之甚少,进一步强调了利用夏威夷Ōiwi (native)科学补充现有监测方法的潜在用途。关注围绕limu和夏威夷福祉的文化知识,可以以支持更高水平的自决和自治的方式为海洋政策提供信息,同时有益于物种及其生态未来,并促进有益的反馈循环,支持包括物种、生态、土著和当地社区在内的沿海福祉。
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.