Impact of ground motion characteristics on the seismic fragility of circular tunnels

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Zhong-Kai Huang , Dong-Mei Zhang , Wu-Yu Zhang , Yong-Bo Li
{"title":"Impact of ground motion characteristics on the seismic fragility of circular tunnels","authors":"Zhong-Kai Huang ,&nbsp;Dong-Mei Zhang ,&nbsp;Wu-Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong-Bo Li","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The seismic performance of tunnel structure can be examined by fragility analysis, which determines the probability that demand will exceed capacity for a given hazard intensity. Although it is commonly understood that earthquake uncertainties dominate fragility features, the implication of ground motion characteristics on the shield tunnel fragility analysis has not been comprehensively explored. Thus, this study aims to compare the effects of various earthquake characteristics on the fragility of the investigated shield tunnels. To this end, a typical shield tunnel was chosen and modelled using the finite element software. In addition, to account for typical ground motion characteristics, various ground motion sets, including near-field no plus motions (NFNP), near-field motions with a pulse (NFP), and far-field motions (FF), are selected, and a fragility analysis was assessed for every set of ground motion. The fragility curves were generated employing peak ground acceleration (PGA) as the intensity measure (IM) and tunnel drift as the damage measure (DM). The findings indicate that shield tunnels subjected to NFP may be more vulnerable compared to those subjected to NFNP and FF ground motions. This study’s findings highlight the vital role of ground motion characteristics in evaluating the fragility of shield tunnels. Moreover, the results may inform future seismic risk and resiliency evaluations regarding the importance of considering or disregarding the impacts of ground motion characteristics on tunnel vulnerability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 180-196"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246796742500056X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The seismic performance of tunnel structure can be examined by fragility analysis, which determines the probability that demand will exceed capacity for a given hazard intensity. Although it is commonly understood that earthquake uncertainties dominate fragility features, the implication of ground motion characteristics on the shield tunnel fragility analysis has not been comprehensively explored. Thus, this study aims to compare the effects of various earthquake characteristics on the fragility of the investigated shield tunnels. To this end, a typical shield tunnel was chosen and modelled using the finite element software. In addition, to account for typical ground motion characteristics, various ground motion sets, including near-field no plus motions (NFNP), near-field motions with a pulse (NFP), and far-field motions (FF), are selected, and a fragility analysis was assessed for every set of ground motion. The fragility curves were generated employing peak ground acceleration (PGA) as the intensity measure (IM) and tunnel drift as the damage measure (DM). The findings indicate that shield tunnels subjected to NFP may be more vulnerable compared to those subjected to NFNP and FF ground motions. This study’s findings highlight the vital role of ground motion characteristics in evaluating the fragility of shield tunnels. Moreover, the results may inform future seismic risk and resiliency evaluations regarding the importance of considering or disregarding the impacts of ground motion characteristics on tunnel vulnerability.
地震动特性对圆形隧道地震易损性的影响
隧道结构的抗震性能可以通过易损性分析来检验,易损性分析决定了在给定的危险强度下需求超过能力的概率。虽然人们普遍认为地震不确定性主导着盾构隧道的易损性特征,但地震动特征对盾构隧道易损性分析的影响尚未得到全面探讨。因此,本研究旨在比较不同地震特征对盾构隧道易损性的影响。为此,选取了一个典型的盾构隧道,利用有限元软件对其进行建模。此外,为了考虑典型的地面运动特征,选择了各种地面运动集,包括近场无加运动(NFNP)、近场脉冲运动(NFP)和远场运动(FF),并对每一组地面运动进行了脆弱性分析。采用峰值地面加速度(PGA)作为强度度量,隧道位移(DM)作为损伤度量,生成了脆性曲线。研究结果表明,与NFNP和FF地震动相比,NFP作用下的盾构隧道可能更脆弱。本研究结果强调了地震动特性在评估盾构隧道脆弱性方面的重要作用。此外,研究结果可以为未来的地震风险和弹性评估提供信息,说明考虑或忽视地面运动特征对隧道易损性的影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信