Physical and mechanical characterization of mortar with partial cement replacement by white mud (kamero)

IF 3.9
Saroj Subedi, Md Tamanna Aalam, Sagar Ranabhat, Prabhat Baral, Laxman Bhujel, Tek Raj Gyawali
{"title":"Physical and mechanical characterization of mortar with partial cement replacement by white mud (kamero)","authors":"Saroj Subedi,&nbsp;Md Tamanna Aalam,&nbsp;Sagar Ranabhat,&nbsp;Prabhat Baral,&nbsp;Laxman Bhujel,&nbsp;Tek Raj Gyawali","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the increasing demand for cement but its production’s effect on CO<sub>2</sub> emission and land degradation, there is a pressing need to find viable alternatives that can partially or significantly replace it. Many studies have investigated the usage of various waste materials for the cement replacement. One promising area of research is focused on white mud (WM), exploring its potential as an effective replacement in construction materials. This study investigates the effectiveness of WM on the physical and mechanical properties of mortar. The control mortar was with water-cement ratio of 0.45 and cement: sand ratio of 1:1.92. The replaced content of WM to cement was 0.0 %, 2.5 %, 5.0 %, 7.5 %, and 10.0 % (by weight of cement). The required physical, mechanical, and durability tests of mortar were conducted. The findings suggest that the optimal replacement percentage is 2.5 %. It increased the 28-day compressive strength by 15.0 %, but decreased the splitting tensile and flexural strengths by 13.7 % and 7.5 %, respectively. The use of WM also caused the increase in the density resulting in the reduction of water absorption. The obtained results suggest that the substitute of cement with WM is viable in both aspects on enhancing the properties of mortar and reducing the cement consumption. Overall, this research highlights the potential of WM as an eco-friendly and effective partial cement replacement, especially at lower substitution levels, which not only enhances the required properties of mortar but also minimizes the cement consumption mitigating the problems of CO<sub>2</sub> emission and land degradation contributing to the sustainable development goals. The implementation of this finding offers multiple benefits, including the production of more sustainable and cost-effective concrete, protection of human health from WM dust through its proper utilization, and the rehabilitation of previously unusable land into fertile ground for increased agricultural productivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525001782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing demand for cement but its production’s effect on CO2 emission and land degradation, there is a pressing need to find viable alternatives that can partially or significantly replace it. Many studies have investigated the usage of various waste materials for the cement replacement. One promising area of research is focused on white mud (WM), exploring its potential as an effective replacement in construction materials. This study investigates the effectiveness of WM on the physical and mechanical properties of mortar. The control mortar was with water-cement ratio of 0.45 and cement: sand ratio of 1:1.92. The replaced content of WM to cement was 0.0 %, 2.5 %, 5.0 %, 7.5 %, and 10.0 % (by weight of cement). The required physical, mechanical, and durability tests of mortar were conducted. The findings suggest that the optimal replacement percentage is 2.5 %. It increased the 28-day compressive strength by 15.0 %, but decreased the splitting tensile and flexural strengths by 13.7 % and 7.5 %, respectively. The use of WM also caused the increase in the density resulting in the reduction of water absorption. The obtained results suggest that the substitute of cement with WM is viable in both aspects on enhancing the properties of mortar and reducing the cement consumption. Overall, this research highlights the potential of WM as an eco-friendly and effective partial cement replacement, especially at lower substitution levels, which not only enhances the required properties of mortar but also minimizes the cement consumption mitigating the problems of CO2 emission and land degradation contributing to the sustainable development goals. The implementation of this finding offers multiple benefits, including the production of more sustainable and cost-effective concrete, protection of human health from WM dust through its proper utilization, and the rehabilitation of previously unusable land into fertile ground for increased agricultural productivity.
用白泥代替部分水泥砂浆的物理力学特性(kamero)
随着对水泥的需求不断增加,但其生产对二氧化碳排放和土地退化的影响,迫切需要找到可行的替代品,可以部分或大量替代水泥。许多研究调查了各种废材料在水泥替代中的使用情况。一个有前途的研究领域集中在白泥(WM),探索其作为建筑材料的有效替代品的潜力。研究了WM对砂浆物理力学性能的影响。对照砂浆水灰比为0.45,灰砂比为1:1.92。WM对水泥的替代含量(以水泥重量计)分别为0.0 %、2.5 %、5.0 %、7.5 %和10.0 %。对砂浆进行了所需的物理、机械和耐久性试验。结果表明,最佳替代率为2.5 %。28天抗压强度提高15.0 %,但劈裂抗拉强度和抗弯强度分别降低13.7 %和7.5 %。WM的使用还会引起密度的增加,从而导致吸水率的降低。研究结果表明,用WM替代水泥在提高砂浆性能和降低水泥用量两方面都是可行的。总的来说,本研究强调了WM作为一种环保和有效的部分水泥替代品的潜力,特别是在较低替代水平下,它不仅提高了砂浆所需的性能,而且最大限度地减少了水泥消耗,缓解了二氧化碳排放和土地退化问题,有助于实现可持续发展目标。实施这一发现可带来多种好处,包括生产更可持续和更具成本效益的混凝土,通过适当利用WM粉尘保护人类健康,以及将以前无法使用的土地恢复为肥沃的土地,以提高农业生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信