Do trilingual individuals exhibit an advantage over bilinguals in executive function tasks?

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jianlin Chen , Ci Jiang , Fang Liu
{"title":"Do trilingual individuals exhibit an advantage over bilinguals in executive function tasks?","authors":"Jianlin Chen ,&nbsp;Ci Jiang ,&nbsp;Fang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature has sparked a debate concerning whether bilingual individuals surpass monolinguals in executive functions, a concept known as the bilingual advantage. This leads to the question of whether this purported bilingual advantage extends to those who are trilingual or multilingual. Consequently, this study seeks to explore whether Tibetan-Chinese-English trilinguals highly proficient in L2 Chinese and learning English as L3 demonstrate superior executive functions in comparison to Chinese-English bilinguals learning English as a foreign language. To measure three distinct executive function sub-components—inhibitory control, information updating, and mental set shifting—we developed the Stroop task, the N-back task, and the switching task. Surprisingly, our results revealed that bilinguals outperformed trilinguals across all three tasks, suggesting late sequential trilinguals in this specific context show no advantage over bilinguals. These findings not only contribute to the ongoing dialogue regarding the bilingual advantage but also provide valuable insights into cognitive enhancement within specific linguistic contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 105354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825006675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature has sparked a debate concerning whether bilingual individuals surpass monolinguals in executive functions, a concept known as the bilingual advantage. This leads to the question of whether this purported bilingual advantage extends to those who are trilingual or multilingual. Consequently, this study seeks to explore whether Tibetan-Chinese-English trilinguals highly proficient in L2 Chinese and learning English as L3 demonstrate superior executive functions in comparison to Chinese-English bilinguals learning English as a foreign language. To measure three distinct executive function sub-components—inhibitory control, information updating, and mental set shifting—we developed the Stroop task, the N-back task, and the switching task. Surprisingly, our results revealed that bilinguals outperformed trilinguals across all three tasks, suggesting late sequential trilinguals in this specific context show no advantage over bilinguals. These findings not only contribute to the ongoing dialogue regarding the bilingual advantage but also provide valuable insights into cognitive enhancement within specific linguistic contexts.
三语者在执行功能任务中是否比双语者表现出优势?
这些文献引发了一场关于双语者在执行功能上是否优于单语者的争论,这一概念被称为双语优势。这就引出了一个问题,即这种所谓的双语优势是否适用于那些会说三种语言或多种语言的人。因此,本研究旨在探讨藏-汉-英三语者在熟练掌握第二语言汉语并将英语作为第三语言学习的情况下,是否比将英语作为外语学习的中-英双语者表现出更高的执行功能。为了测量三个不同的执行功能子组件——抑制控制、信息更新和心理集转移——我们开发了Stroop任务、N-back任务和切换任务。令人惊讶的是,我们的研究结果显示,双语者在所有三项任务中的表现都优于三语者,这表明在这种特定情境下,晚期连续三语者并不比双语者有优势。这些发现不仅有助于关于双语优势的持续对话,而且为特定语言环境下的认知增强提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信