Intraoperative Methadone Versus Other Opioids: A Retrospective Review of Postoperative Outcomes in Pediatric Surgeries.

Stephanie J Pan,Elizabeth De Souza,T Anthony Anderson
{"title":"Intraoperative Methadone Versus Other Opioids: A Retrospective Review of Postoperative Outcomes in Pediatric Surgeries.","authors":"Stephanie J Pan,Elizabeth De Souza,T Anthony Anderson","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nFindings of randomized controlled trials indicate that intraoperative methadone administration reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption compared to other opioids in many patient populations. While concerns about potential risks persist, large retrospective studies may be able to assess risks from methadone versus other opioids. Recent retrospective studies in adult patients found no association between methadone administration and adverse outcomes. Similar studies in pediatric patients are lacking. This retrospective study investigates the association of intraoperative methadone with postanesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores and other relevant postoperative outcomes compared to other opioids.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) undergoing 1 of 6 surgeries from January 1, 2018 to February 29, 2024: spinal fusion for scoliosis, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, bilateral mastectomy with nipple reconstruction, knee surgeries, Nuss repair for pectus excavatum, and cleft palate repair. The primary outcome was maximum PACU pain scores in patients receiving intraoperative methadone versus other opioids. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of moderate-severe PACU pain, opioid consumption, naloxone administration, emergence delirium, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and PACU length of stay (LOS). Results were analyzed using regression models, controlled for appropriate variables including procedure, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), the number of pre/intraoperative adjuvants, and the use of regional anesthesia. Predefined subgroup analyses were conducted to compare patients who received methadone versus other opioids in the setting of (1) receiving preincision regional anesthesia; (2) receiving an intraoperative remifentanil infusion; and (3) in the methadone group, receiving a methadone dose ≥0.15 mg kg-1.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n1794 patients were included; 528 received methadone. Patients receiving methadone had a lower maximum PACU pain score (3.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.6-4.2] vs 4.5 [95% CI 4.3-4.6]; P = .007), decreased PACU opioid consumption (0.06 vs 0.09 MEU kg-1; P < .001), decreased emergence delirium (9.60% vs 16.90%; P < .001), and no statistically significant difference in naloxone administration, PONV, and PACU LOS compared to the other-opioid group.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn this large, single-center retrospective study, intraoperative methadone administered to pediatric patients was found to be associated with reduced postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and emergence delirium. Larger studies are needed to achieve the necessary power to assess adverse events in pediatric surgical patients who receive methadone versus other opioids.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Findings of randomized controlled trials indicate that intraoperative methadone administration reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption compared to other opioids in many patient populations. While concerns about potential risks persist, large retrospective studies may be able to assess risks from methadone versus other opioids. Recent retrospective studies in adult patients found no association between methadone administration and adverse outcomes. Similar studies in pediatric patients are lacking. This retrospective study investigates the association of intraoperative methadone with postanesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores and other relevant postoperative outcomes compared to other opioids. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) undergoing 1 of 6 surgeries from January 1, 2018 to February 29, 2024: spinal fusion for scoliosis, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, bilateral mastectomy with nipple reconstruction, knee surgeries, Nuss repair for pectus excavatum, and cleft palate repair. The primary outcome was maximum PACU pain scores in patients receiving intraoperative methadone versus other opioids. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of moderate-severe PACU pain, opioid consumption, naloxone administration, emergence delirium, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and PACU length of stay (LOS). Results were analyzed using regression models, controlled for appropriate variables including procedure, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), the number of pre/intraoperative adjuvants, and the use of regional anesthesia. Predefined subgroup analyses were conducted to compare patients who received methadone versus other opioids in the setting of (1) receiving preincision regional anesthesia; (2) receiving an intraoperative remifentanil infusion; and (3) in the methadone group, receiving a methadone dose ≥0.15 mg kg-1. RESULTS 1794 patients were included; 528 received methadone. Patients receiving methadone had a lower maximum PACU pain score (3.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.6-4.2] vs 4.5 [95% CI 4.3-4.6]; P = .007), decreased PACU opioid consumption (0.06 vs 0.09 MEU kg-1; P < .001), decreased emergence delirium (9.60% vs 16.90%; P < .001), and no statistically significant difference in naloxone administration, PONV, and PACU LOS compared to the other-opioid group. CONCLUSIONS In this large, single-center retrospective study, intraoperative methadone administered to pediatric patients was found to be associated with reduced postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and emergence delirium. Larger studies are needed to achieve the necessary power to assess adverse events in pediatric surgical patients who receive methadone versus other opioids.
术中美沙酮与其他阿片类药物:儿科手术术后结果的回顾性回顾。
背景:随机对照试验结果表明,与其他阿片类药物相比,术中给药美沙酮可以减少术后疼痛和阿片类药物的消耗。尽管对潜在风险的担忧仍然存在,但大型回顾性研究可能能够评估美沙酮与其他阿片类药物的风险。最近对成年患者的回顾性研究发现美沙酮给药与不良后果之间没有关联。在儿科患者中缺乏类似的研究。本回顾性研究调查了与其他阿片类药物相比,术中美沙酮与麻醉后护理单位(PACU)疼痛评分和其他相关术后结果的关系。方法回顾性队列研究2018年1月1日至2024年2月29日6例手术中的1例(≤18岁)儿童患者:脊柱融合术治疗脊柱侧凸、腹腔镜袖胃切除术、双侧乳房切除术合并乳头重建术、膝关节手术、漏斗胸Nuss修复术和腭裂修复术。主要结局是术中接受美沙酮与其他阿片类药物治疗的患者PACU疼痛评分最大值。次要结局是中重度PACU疼痛、阿片类药物消耗、纳洛酮给药、出现性谵妄、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)和PACU住院时间(LOS)的发生率。使用回归模型对结果进行分析,控制了适当的变量,包括手术、年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、体重指数(BMI)、术前/术中辅助剂的数量以及区域麻醉的使用。预先设定的亚组分析进行了比较患者接受美沙酮和其他阿片类药物设置(1)接受切口前区域麻醉;(2)术中输注瑞芬太尼;(3)美沙酮组,美沙酮剂量≥0.15 mg kg-1。结果共纳入1794例患者;528人接受美沙酮治疗。接受美沙酮治疗的患者PACU最大疼痛评分较低(3.9[95%可信区间{CI}, 3.6-4.2] vs 4.5 [95% CI 4.3-4.6];P = .007), PACU阿片类药物消耗减少(0.06 vs 0.09 MEU kg-1;P < 0.001),出现性谵妄减少(9.60% vs 16.90%;P < 0.001),与其他阿片类药物组相比,纳洛酮给药、PONV和PACU LOS无统计学差异。结论:在这项大型单中心回顾性研究中,发现小儿患者术中给予美沙酮可降低术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗和出现性谵妄。需要更大规模的研究来评估接受美沙酮与其他阿片类药物治疗的儿科外科患者的不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信