A randomized controlled trial comparing treatment efficacy between rapid maxillary expansion and adenotonsillectomy in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

IF 2
Chalermthai Aksilp, Pattaralapa Pechpongsai, Pavinee Intakorn, Chaiyapol Chaweewannakorn, Supatchai Boonpratham, Yodhathai Satravaha, Niwat Anuwongnukroh, Supakit Peanchitlertkajorn
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial comparing treatment efficacy between rapid maxillary expansion and adenotonsillectomy in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.","authors":"Chalermthai Aksilp, Pattaralapa Pechpongsai, Pavinee Intakorn, Chaiyapol Chaweewannakorn, Supatchai Boonpratham, Yodhathai Satravaha, Niwat Anuwongnukroh, Supakit Peanchitlertkajorn","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03427-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is usually recommended as the first-line therapy for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). While AT treats soft tissue obstruction, it does not address the underlying skeletal abnormalities, such as maxillary constriction. Despite growing evidence supporting RME as a treatment option for POSA, a significant research gap remains. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment efficacy between RME and AT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited 24 children diagnosed with POSA and presented with concurrent significant adenotonsillar hypertrophy and transverse maxillary deficiency. Participants were randomly assigned to either AT or RME for treatment. All participants underwent Type I PSG at baseline and 6 months post-treatment. Additional assessments included dental and cephalometric analyses, the pediatric sleep questionnaire (PSQ), and the OSA-18 questionnaire. Baseline and endpoint comparisons between the two treatment groups were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median baseline AHI for the AT and RME groups was 7.0 (5.25-9.9) and 6.85 (5.6-8.05) events/hour, respectively. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in all parameters at baseline. The comparisons between pre- and post-treatment results showed significant improvements across multiple parameters, including AHI for both AT and RME. There was no significant difference in PSG parameters (AHI, LSAT, MSAT, and REM sleep time) and cure rate between RME and AT. The post-treatment AHI for the AT and RME groups was 1.4 (0.7-1.85) and 2.3 (1.15-5.7) events/hour, respectively. However, PSQ and OSA-18 scores were significantly higher for the RME group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RME and AT significantly improved sleep-related respiratory parameters in patients with POSA. RME demonstrated comparable efficacy to AT in reducing AHI and improving LAST, MSAT, and REM sleep time. However, AT provided significantly better improvement in clinical symptoms and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The registration of this randomized controlled trial was approved on August 24th, 2023, under the registration number TCTR20230824001.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 4","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03427-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is usually recommended as the first-line therapy for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). While AT treats soft tissue obstruction, it does not address the underlying skeletal abnormalities, such as maxillary constriction. Despite growing evidence supporting RME as a treatment option for POSA, a significant research gap remains. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment efficacy between RME and AT.

Methods: This study recruited 24 children diagnosed with POSA and presented with concurrent significant adenotonsillar hypertrophy and transverse maxillary deficiency. Participants were randomly assigned to either AT or RME for treatment. All participants underwent Type I PSG at baseline and 6 months post-treatment. Additional assessments included dental and cephalometric analyses, the pediatric sleep questionnaire (PSQ), and the OSA-18 questionnaire. Baseline and endpoint comparisons between the two treatment groups were performed.

Results: The median baseline AHI for the AT and RME groups was 7.0 (5.25-9.9) and 6.85 (5.6-8.05) events/hour, respectively. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in all parameters at baseline. The comparisons between pre- and post-treatment results showed significant improvements across multiple parameters, including AHI for both AT and RME. There was no significant difference in PSG parameters (AHI, LSAT, MSAT, and REM sleep time) and cure rate between RME and AT. The post-treatment AHI for the AT and RME groups was 1.4 (0.7-1.85) and 2.3 (1.15-5.7) events/hour, respectively. However, PSQ and OSA-18 scores were significantly higher for the RME group.

Conclusion: RME and AT significantly improved sleep-related respiratory parameters in patients with POSA. RME demonstrated comparable efficacy to AT in reducing AHI and improving LAST, MSAT, and REM sleep time. However, AT provided significantly better improvement in clinical symptoms and quality of life.

Trial registration: The registration of this randomized controlled trial was approved on August 24th, 2023, under the registration number TCTR20230824001.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项比较快速上颌扩张和腺扁桃体切除术治疗儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停疗效的随机对照试验。
目的:腺扁桃体切除术(AT)通常被推荐为儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)的一线治疗方法。虽然AT治疗软组织阻塞,但它不能解决潜在的骨骼异常,如上颌缩窄。尽管越来越多的证据支持RME作为POSA的治疗选择,但重大的研究差距仍然存在。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验来比较RME和AT的治疗效果。方法:本研究招募了24名诊断为POSA的儿童,并同时出现明显的腺扁桃体肥大和上颌横向缺陷。参与者被随机分配到AT或RME治疗组。所有参与者在基线和治疗后6个月接受I型PSG检查。其他评估包括牙科和头侧测量分析、儿童睡眠问卷(PSQ)和OSA-18问卷。在两个治疗组之间进行基线和终点比较。结果:AT组和RME组的中位基线AHI分别为7.0(5.25-9.9)和6.85(5.6-8.05)事件/小时。在基线时,各治疗组间各项参数均无显著差异。治疗前后结果的比较显示,包括AT和RME的AHI在内的多个参数均有显著改善。RME与AT在PSG参数(AHI、LSAT、MSAT、REM睡眠时间)及治愈率上无显著差异。AT组和RME组治疗后AHI分别为1.4(0.7-1.85)和2.3(1.15-5.7)事件/小时。然而,RME组的PSQ和OSA-18得分明显更高。结论:RME和AT可显著改善POSA患者的睡眠相关呼吸参数。RME在降低AHI和改善LAST、MSAT和REM睡眠时间方面显示出与AT相当的疗效。然而,AT在临床症状和生活质量方面提供了明显更好的改善。试验注册:该随机对照试验于2023年8月24日获批注册,注册号为TCTR20230824001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信