{"title":"Frontal QRS-T Angle as a Prognostic Marker of Long-Term Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients-Uncorrected Proof.","authors":"Çağlar Kaya, Mustafa Ebik, Cihan Öztürk, Merve Akbulut Çakır, Emirhan Çakır, İlhan Kılıç","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2025.98252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The electrocardiogram is a crucial, cost-effective, and noninvasive tool for assessing the risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. The frontal QRS-T angle is a marker of ventricular repolarization. This study investigated whether the frontal QRS-T angle could predict mortality in hemodialysis patients over a seven-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 110 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis. Frontal QRS-T angles greater than 90 degrees were classified as wide. Patients were categorized based on the width of the QRS-T angle and the presence or absence of mortality. Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters measured included the QRS, T axis, TP/QT ratio, fragmented QRS, TPe/QTc ratio, and the frontal QRS-T angle, defined as the absolute difference between the frontal QRS and T axes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 patients (34%) had a wide frontal QRS-T angle. The mean age was significantly higher in both the wide frontal QRS-T angle group and the mortality group. Ejection fraction was lower in the mortality group. The frontal QRS-T angle was wider in the mortality group (94 [31-113] vs. 33 [16-80], P < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, having a wide QRS-T angle was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 8.08, confidence interval [CI]: 2.75-23.74, P < 0.001). Additionally, the presence of fragmented QRS also increased mortality risk (OR: 11.25, CI: 2.98-42.49, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate the independent prognostic value of the frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing hemodialysis, irrespective of ejection fraction status. This suggests that it may serve as a valuable tool in routine cardiovascular risk assessments, contributing to improved management strategies for this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2025.98252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The electrocardiogram is a crucial, cost-effective, and noninvasive tool for assessing the risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality. The frontal QRS-T angle is a marker of ventricular repolarization. This study investigated whether the frontal QRS-T angle could predict mortality in hemodialysis patients over a seven-year follow-up period.
Method: The study included 110 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis. Frontal QRS-T angles greater than 90 degrees were classified as wide. Patients were categorized based on the width of the QRS-T angle and the presence or absence of mortality. Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters measured included the QRS, T axis, TP/QT ratio, fragmented QRS, TPe/QTc ratio, and the frontal QRS-T angle, defined as the absolute difference between the frontal QRS and T axes.
Results: A total of 37 patients (34%) had a wide frontal QRS-T angle. The mean age was significantly higher in both the wide frontal QRS-T angle group and the mortality group. Ejection fraction was lower in the mortality group. The frontal QRS-T angle was wider in the mortality group (94 [31-113] vs. 33 [16-80], P < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, having a wide QRS-T angle was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 8.08, confidence interval [CI]: 2.75-23.74, P < 0.001). Additionally, the presence of fragmented QRS also increased mortality risk (OR: 11.25, CI: 2.98-42.49, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the independent prognostic value of the frontal QRS-T angle in patients undergoing hemodialysis, irrespective of ejection fraction status. This suggests that it may serve as a valuable tool in routine cardiovascular risk assessments, contributing to improved management strategies for this high-risk population.