Electrosurgical Laceration and Stabilization of Clip Followed by Transapical Mitral Valve Replacement after Failed Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: A Promising Alternative to Surgery.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Fabio Pregaldini, Mevlüt Çelik, Maria Nucera, Selim Mosbahi, Kai Alexander Münker, Paul Potratz, Fabien Praz, David Reineke, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh
{"title":"Electrosurgical Laceration and Stabilization of Clip Followed by Transapical Mitral Valve Replacement after Failed Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: A Promising Alternative to Surgery.","authors":"Fabio Pregaldini, Mevlüt Çelik, Maria Nucera, Selim Mosbahi, Kai Alexander Münker, Paul Potratz, Fabien Praz, David Reineke, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study analyses perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of the clip (ELASTA-clip), followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional mitral valve surgery (MVS) after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who experienced failure of a transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair and subsequently underwent either the ELASTA-clip procedure followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional open MVS were retrospectively analysed. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes including mortality, stroke, bleeding, pacemaker implantation, and the need for mechanical circulatory support were assessed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 patients were enrolled in the ELASTA group and 31 in the open surgery group, with median follow-up periods of 2 years [IQR: 1.2-2.1] and 1.4 years [IQR: 0.3-3.7], respectively. Procedural success was achieved in all ELASTA cases (100%) compared to 96% in the open surgery group. No in-hospital deaths occurred in the ELASTA group, whereas the surgical group had a mortality rate of 6.5% (n = 2). During follow-up, adverse events occurred in 20% (n = 1) of ELASTA patients and 54.8% (n = 17) of those who underwent surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical intervention in patients with failed edge-to-edge mitral valve repair carries a high risk of complications. The ELASTA-clip technique, combined with transapical mitral valve replacement, offers a minimally invasive and safe alternative to conventional surgery, highlighting the need for further prospective studies with longer-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study analyses perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of the clip (ELASTA-clip), followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional mitral valve surgery (MVS) after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.

Methods: Consecutive patients who experienced failure of a transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair and subsequently underwent either the ELASTA-clip procedure followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional open MVS were retrospectively analysed. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes including mortality, stroke, bleeding, pacemaker implantation, and the need for mechanical circulatory support were assessed descriptively.

Results: A total of 5 patients were enrolled in the ELASTA group and 31 in the open surgery group, with median follow-up periods of 2 years [IQR: 1.2-2.1] and 1.4 years [IQR: 0.3-3.7], respectively. Procedural success was achieved in all ELASTA cases (100%) compared to 96% in the open surgery group. No in-hospital deaths occurred in the ELASTA group, whereas the surgical group had a mortality rate of 6.5% (n = 2). During follow-up, adverse events occurred in 20% (n = 1) of ELASTA patients and 54.8% (n = 17) of those who underwent surgery.

Conclusions: Surgical intervention in patients with failed edge-to-edge mitral valve repair carries a high risk of complications. The ELASTA-clip technique, combined with transapical mitral valve replacement, offers a minimally invasive and safe alternative to conventional surgery, highlighting the need for further prospective studies with longer-term follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经导管边缘到边缘二尖瓣修复失败后,电外科割伤和固定夹后经尖顶二尖瓣置换术:一种有希望的手术替代方法。
目的:本研究分析经导管二尖瓣边缘到边缘修复失败后,行经导管电刀割伤和稳定夹(ELASTA-clip),然后行经根尖二尖瓣置换术或常规二尖瓣手术的患者围手术期结果。方法:回顾性分析连续的经导管边缘到边缘二尖瓣修复失败的患者,他们随后接受了elasta夹手术和经根尖二尖瓣置换术,或传统的开放式二尖瓣手术。对围手术期和中期结果进行描述性评估,包括死亡率、卒中、出血、起搏器植入和机械循环支持的需求。结果:ELASTA组入组5例,开放手术组入组31例,中位随访时间分别为2年[IQR: 1.2-2.1]和1.4年[IQR: 0.3-3.7]。所有ELASTA病例的手术成功率为100%,而开放手术组的手术成功率为96%。ELASTA组未发生院内死亡,而手术组的死亡率为6.5% (n = 2)。随访期间,20% (n = 1)的ELASTA患者发生不良事件,54.8% (n = 17)的手术患者发生不良事件。结论:二尖瓣边缘到边缘修复失败的患者手术干预有较高的并发症风险。ELASTA-clip技术与经根尖二尖瓣置换术相结合,为传统手术提供了一种微创和安全的选择,强调了进一步的前瞻性研究和长期随访的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信