Pure Well-differentiated Adenocarcinoma as a Safe Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence of T1 Colorectal Cancer.

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.23922/jarc.2024-105
Ken Inoue, Naohisa Yoshida, Reo Kobayashi, Ryohei Hirose, Naoto Iwai, Osamu Dohi, Takaaki Murakami, Yutaka Inada, Tomohiro Arita, Yukiko Morinaga, Eiichi Konishi, Yoshito Itoh
{"title":"Pure Well-differentiated Adenocarcinoma as a Safe Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence of T1 Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Ken Inoue, Naohisa Yoshida, Reo Kobayashi, Ryohei Hirose, Naoto Iwai, Osamu Dohi, Takaaki Murakami, Yutaka Inada, Tomohiro Arita, Yukiko Morinaga, Eiichi Konishi, Yoshito Itoh","doi":"10.23922/jarc.2024-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pure well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (PWDA) could be a safe factor against lymph node metastasis (LNM) and recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer. We investigated the utility and endoscopic features of PWDA to determine its predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the LNM and recurrence rates, along with various clinicopathological factors, including PWDA, in 315 patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection at our center. PWDA was defined as a lesion consisting of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma only. Three pathologists evaluated the consistency of the PWDA diagnosis and performed inter- and intraobserver assessments of PWDA and lymphatic invasion. Endoscopic features of PWDA was also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LNM, recurrence, and PWDA rates in patients with T1 colorectal cancer were 9.5%, 2.9%, and 31.1%, respectively. Significant differences were observed in T1b (100% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.014) and non-PWDA (100% vs. 65.6%; p < 0.001) between patients with and without LNM. Multivariate analyses showed that non-PWDA was an independent risk factor for LNM (odds ratio [OR], 12.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-92.0; p = 0.016). Furthermore, significant differences in venous invasion (44.4% vs. 19.6%; p < 0.001), and non-PWDA (100% vs. 68.0%; p < 0.001) were observed between patients with and without recurrence. The agreement among three pathologists on the diagnosis of PWDA was acceptable (kappa value > 0.5). Surface redness (p < 0.001), a rugged surface (p < 0.01), fold convergence (p < 0.001), and an impression of fullness (p = 0.031) were significantly related with PWDA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PWDA can predict safety against LNM and recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":56349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","volume":"9 3","pages":"302-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2024-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pure well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (PWDA) could be a safe factor against lymph node metastasis (LNM) and recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer. We investigated the utility and endoscopic features of PWDA to determine its predictive ability.

Methods: We analyzed the LNM and recurrence rates, along with various clinicopathological factors, including PWDA, in 315 patients with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection at our center. PWDA was defined as a lesion consisting of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma only. Three pathologists evaluated the consistency of the PWDA diagnosis and performed inter- and intraobserver assessments of PWDA and lymphatic invasion. Endoscopic features of PWDA was also examined.

Results: The LNM, recurrence, and PWDA rates in patients with T1 colorectal cancer were 9.5%, 2.9%, and 31.1%, respectively. Significant differences were observed in T1b (100% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.014) and non-PWDA (100% vs. 65.6%; p < 0.001) between patients with and without LNM. Multivariate analyses showed that non-PWDA was an independent risk factor for LNM (odds ratio [OR], 12.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-92.0; p = 0.016). Furthermore, significant differences in venous invasion (44.4% vs. 19.6%; p < 0.001), and non-PWDA (100% vs. 68.0%; p < 0.001) were observed between patients with and without recurrence. The agreement among three pathologists on the diagnosis of PWDA was acceptable (kappa value > 0.5). Surface redness (p < 0.001), a rugged surface (p < 0.01), fold convergence (p < 0.001), and an impression of fullness (p = 0.031) were significantly related with PWDA.

Conclusions: PWDA can predict safety against LNM and recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

纯高分化腺癌是T1期结直肠癌淋巴结转移和复发的安全因素。
目的:纯高分化腺癌(PWDA)可能是T1期结直肠癌患者预防淋巴结转移(LNM)和复发的安全因素。我们研究了PWDA的效用和内镜特征,以确定其预测能力。方法:分析315例T1期结直肠癌手术切除患者的LNM、复发率及各种临床病理因素,包括PWDA。PWDA被定义为仅由高分化腺癌组成的病变。三位病理学家评估了PWDA诊断的一致性,并对PWDA和淋巴浸润进行了观察间和观察内评估。还检查了PWDA的内镜特征。结果:T1期结直肠癌患者的LNM、复发率和PWDA分别为9.5%、2.9%和31.1%。在T1b中观察到显著差异(100% vs. 82.8%;p = 0.014)和非pwda (100% vs. 65.6%;p < 0.001)。多因素分析显示,非pwda是LNM的独立危险因素(优势比[OR], 12.09;95%置信区间[CI], 1.59-92.0;P = 0.016)。此外,两组在静脉侵犯方面存在显著差异(44.4% vs. 19.6%;p < 0.001),非pwda (100% vs. 68.0%;P < 0.001)。三名病理医师对PWDA诊断的一致性是可以接受的(kappa值> 0.5)。表面发红(p < 0.001)、粗糙表面(p < 0.01)、褶皱收敛(p < 0.001)和丰满印象(p = 0.031)与PWDA显著相关。结论:PWDA可预测T1期结直肠癌患者的LNM安全性和复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书