Explaining Person-by-Item Responses using Person- and Item-Level Predictors via Random Forests and Interpretable Machine Learning in Explanatory Item Response Models.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Sun-Joo Cho, Goodwin Amanda, Jorge Salas, Sophia Mueller
{"title":"Explaining Person-by-Item Responses using Person- and Item-Level Predictors via Random Forests and Interpretable Machine Learning in Explanatory Item Response Models.","authors":"Sun-Joo Cho, Goodwin Amanda, Jorge Salas, Sophia Mueller","doi":"10.1017/psy.2025.10032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study incorporates a random forest (RF) approach to probe complex interactions and nonlinearity among predictors into an item response model with the goal of using a hybrid approach to outperform either an RF or explanatory item response model (EIRM) only in explaining item responses. In the specified model, called EIRM-RF, predicted values using RF are added as a predictor in EIRM to model the nonlinear and interaction effects of person- and item-level predictors in person-by-item response data, while accounting for random effects over persons and items. The results of the EIRM-RF are probed with interpretable machine learning (ML) methods, including feature importance measures, partial dependence plots, accumulated local effect plots, and the <i>H</i>-statistic. The EIRM-RF and the interpretable methods are illustrated using an empirical data set to explain differences in reading comprehension in digital versus paper mediums, and the results of EIRM-RF are compared with those of EIRM and RF to show empirical differences in modeling the effects of predictors and random effects among EIRM, RF, and EIRM-RF. In addition, simulation studies are conducted to compare model accuracy among the three models and to evaluate the performance of interpretable ML methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":54534,"journal":{"name":"Psychometrika","volume":" ","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychometrika","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/psy.2025.10032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study incorporates a random forest (RF) approach to probe complex interactions and nonlinearity among predictors into an item response model with the goal of using a hybrid approach to outperform either an RF or explanatory item response model (EIRM) only in explaining item responses. In the specified model, called EIRM-RF, predicted values using RF are added as a predictor in EIRM to model the nonlinear and interaction effects of person- and item-level predictors in person-by-item response data, while accounting for random effects over persons and items. The results of the EIRM-RF are probed with interpretable machine learning (ML) methods, including feature importance measures, partial dependence plots, accumulated local effect plots, and the H-statistic. The EIRM-RF and the interpretable methods are illustrated using an empirical data set to explain differences in reading comprehension in digital versus paper mediums, and the results of EIRM-RF are compared with those of EIRM and RF to show empirical differences in modeling the effects of predictors and random effects among EIRM, RF, and EIRM-RF. In addition, simulation studies are conducted to compare model accuracy among the three models and to evaluate the performance of interpretable ML methods.

通过随机森林和解释性项目反应模型中的可解释机器学习,使用个人和项目水平预测因子解释个人对项目的反应。
本研究采用随机森林(RF)方法来探索预测因子之间的复杂相互作用和非线性,并将其纳入项目反应模型,目的是使用混合方法在解释项目反应方面优于随机森林或解释性项目反应模型(EIRM)。在指定的模型中,称为EIRM-RF,使用RF的预测值被添加为EIRM中的预测因子,以模拟个人和项目层面预测因子在个人-项目响应数据中的非线性和相互作用效应,同时考虑到人员和项目的随机效应。EIRM-RF的结果用可解释的机器学习(ML)方法进行了探测,包括特征重要性度量、部分依赖图、累积局部效应图和h统计量。本文使用一组经验数据来说明EIRM-RF和可解释方法,以解释数字媒介与纸质媒介在阅读理解方面的差异,并将EIRM-RF的结果与EIRM和RF的结果进行比较,以显示EIRM、RF和EIRM-RF在预测因子和随机效应建模方面的经验差异。此外,还进行了仿真研究,比较了三种模型之间的模型精度,并评估了可解释ML方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychometrika
Psychometrika 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Psychometrika is devoted to the advancement of theory and methodology for behavioral data in psychology, education and the social and behavioral sciences generally. Its coverage is offered in two sections: Theory and Methods (T& M), and Application Reviews and Case Studies (ARCS). T&M articles present original research and reviews on the development of quantitative models, statistical methods, and mathematical techniques for evaluating data from psychology, the social and behavioral sciences and related fields. Application Reviews can be integrative, drawing together disparate methodologies for applications, or comparative and evaluative, discussing advantages and disadvantages of one or more methodologies in applications. Case Studies highlight methodology that deepens understanding of substantive phenomena through more informative data analysis, or more elegant data description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信