Athletes Who Test Positive on Multiple Domains of the Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screen Take Longer to Return to Play.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Bobby Jean Lee, J Craig Garrison, Shiho Goto, Joseph Hannon, Kalyssa Creed, Damond Blueitt, Caitlin Nadolny
{"title":"Athletes Who Test Positive on Multiple Domains of the Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screen Take Longer to Return to Play.","authors":"Bobby Jean Lee, J Craig Garrison, Shiho Goto, Joseph Hannon, Kalyssa Creed, Damond Blueitt, Caitlin Nadolny","doi":"10.1177/19417381251359954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) is a validated tool that is used to assess symptom provocation with vestibular and ocular testing following sport-related concussion (SRC). It is unknown if the involvement of multiple domains on the VOMS effects time to return to play (RTP) following SRC.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Athletes who tested positive on >3 domains of the VOMS would take longer to RTP than athletes who tested positive on ≤3 domains of the VOMS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 928 athletes were enrolled from a concussion clinic. The median VOMS score was used to divide these athletes into 2 groups, those who tested positive on ≤3 domains (LOW) and those who tested positive on >3 domains (HIGH). Independent <i>t</i>-tests were used to assess for differences in time to RTP between groups. A simple linear regression was carried out to assess the influence of positive testing on the VOMS domains at the time of first evaluation on time to RTP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent <i>t</i>-tests demonstrated a significant difference in time to RTP between the LOW and HIGH groups, with the LOW group returning to play an average of 12.81 days sooner than the HIGH group. The simple linear regression showed that approximately 10.8% of the time to RTP after SRC could be explained by the number of domains that test positive at initial evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Athletes who test positive on >3 domains of the VOMS take longer to RTP than athletes who test positive on ≤3 domains of the VOMS at the time of initial evaluation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The VOMS may be utilized to help determine which athletes may take longer to RTP based on the number of domains that are affected after SRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251359954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251359954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) is a validated tool that is used to assess symptom provocation with vestibular and ocular testing following sport-related concussion (SRC). It is unknown if the involvement of multiple domains on the VOMS effects time to return to play (RTP) following SRC.

Hypothesis: Athletes who tested positive on >3 domains of the VOMS would take longer to RTP than athletes who tested positive on ≤3 domains of the VOMS.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: A total of 928 athletes were enrolled from a concussion clinic. The median VOMS score was used to divide these athletes into 2 groups, those who tested positive on ≤3 domains (LOW) and those who tested positive on >3 domains (HIGH). Independent t-tests were used to assess for differences in time to RTP between groups. A simple linear regression was carried out to assess the influence of positive testing on the VOMS domains at the time of first evaluation on time to RTP.

Results: Independent t-tests demonstrated a significant difference in time to RTP between the LOW and HIGH groups, with the LOW group returning to play an average of 12.81 days sooner than the HIGH group. The simple linear regression showed that approximately 10.8% of the time to RTP after SRC could be explained by the number of domains that test positive at initial evaluation.

Conclusion: Athletes who test positive on >3 domains of the VOMS take longer to RTP than athletes who test positive on ≤3 domains of the VOMS at the time of initial evaluation.

Clinical relevance: The VOMS may be utilized to help determine which athletes may take longer to RTP based on the number of domains that are affected after SRC.

在前庭-眼运动屏幕多个领域测试呈阳性的运动员需要更长的时间才能恢复比赛。
背景:前庭-眼运动筛查(VOMS)是一种经过验证的工具,用于评估运动相关脑震荡(SRC)后前庭和眼测试的症状激发。目前尚不清楚VOMS上多个域的参与是否会影响SRC后的RTP时间。假设:VOMS检测为0 ~ 3个域的运动员比VOMS检测为≤3个域的运动员需要更长的时间才能到达RTP。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。证据等级:三级。方法:从某脑震荡门诊招募928名运动员。采用VOMS中位评分将运动员分为≤3个域阳性组(LOW)和>3个域阳性组(HIGH)。采用独立t检验评估两组间RTP时间的差异。采用简单的线性回归来评估首次评估时阳性检测对VOMS域对RTP时间的影响。结果:独立t检验显示LOW组和HIGH组在RTP恢复时间上有显著差异,LOW组比HIGH组平均早12.81天恢复游戏。简单线性回归表明,SRC后约10.8%的RTP时间可以用初始评估时检测阳性的结构域数量来解释。结论:在初始评价时,VOMS检测bbbb3域阳性的运动员比VOMS检测≤3域阳性的运动员需要更长的RTP时间。临床相关性:VOMS可以根据SRC后受影响的结构域的数量来帮助确定哪些运动员需要更长的时间才能完成RTP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信