The Role of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep in Neural Differentiation of Memories in the Hippocampus.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Elizabeth A McDevitt, Ghootae Kim, Nicholas B Turk-Browne, Kenneth A Norman
{"title":"The Role of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep in Neural Differentiation of Memories in the Hippocampus.","authors":"Elizabeth A McDevitt, Ghootae Kim, Nicholas B Turk-Browne, Kenneth A Norman","doi":"10.1162/jocn.a.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When faced with a familiar situation, we can use memory to make predictions about what will happen next. If such predictions turn out to be erroneous, the brain can adapt by differentiating the representations of the cue from the mispredicted item itself, reducing the likelihood of future prediction errors. Prior work by Kim, Norman, and Turk-Browne (2017) found that violating a sequential association in a statistical learning paradigm triggered differentiation of the neural representations of the associated items in the hippocampus. Here, we used fMRI to test the preregistered hypothesis that this hippocampal differentiation occurs only when violations are followed by rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Participants first learned that some items predict others (e.g., A predicts B) and then encountered a violation in which a predicted item (B) failed to appear when expected after its associated item (A); the predicted item later appeared on its own after an unrelated item. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of three conditions: remain awake, take a nap containing non-REM sleep only, or take a nap with both non-REM and REM sleep. While the predicted results were not observed in the preregistered left CA2/3/dentate gyrus (DG) ROI, we did observe evidence for our hypothesis in closely related hippocampal ROIs, uncorrected for multiple comparisons: In right CA2/3/DG, differentiation in the group with REM sleep was greater than in the groups without REM sleep (wake and non-REM nap); this differentiation was item-specific and concentrated in right DG. REM-related differentiation effects were also greater in bilateral DG when the predicted item was more strongly reactivated during the violation. Overall, these results provide initial evidence linking REM sleep to changes in the hippocampal representations of memories in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.a.82","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When faced with a familiar situation, we can use memory to make predictions about what will happen next. If such predictions turn out to be erroneous, the brain can adapt by differentiating the representations of the cue from the mispredicted item itself, reducing the likelihood of future prediction errors. Prior work by Kim, Norman, and Turk-Browne (2017) found that violating a sequential association in a statistical learning paradigm triggered differentiation of the neural representations of the associated items in the hippocampus. Here, we used fMRI to test the preregistered hypothesis that this hippocampal differentiation occurs only when violations are followed by rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Participants first learned that some items predict others (e.g., A predicts B) and then encountered a violation in which a predicted item (B) failed to appear when expected after its associated item (A); the predicted item later appeared on its own after an unrelated item. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of three conditions: remain awake, take a nap containing non-REM sleep only, or take a nap with both non-REM and REM sleep. While the predicted results were not observed in the preregistered left CA2/3/dentate gyrus (DG) ROI, we did observe evidence for our hypothesis in closely related hippocampal ROIs, uncorrected for multiple comparisons: In right CA2/3/DG, differentiation in the group with REM sleep was greater than in the groups without REM sleep (wake and non-REM nap); this differentiation was item-specific and concentrated in right DG. REM-related differentiation effects were also greater in bilateral DG when the predicted item was more strongly reactivated during the violation. Overall, these results provide initial evidence linking REM sleep to changes in the hippocampal representations of memories in humans.

快速眼动睡眠在海马记忆神经分化中的作用。
当面对熟悉的情况时,我们可以利用记忆来预测接下来会发生什么。如果这样的预测被证明是错误的,大脑可以通过区分线索的表征和被错误预测的项目本身来适应,减少未来预测错误的可能性。Kim、Norman和Turk-Browne(2017)先前的研究发现,在统计学习范式中违反顺序关联会引发海马体中相关项目的神经表征分化。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来验证预先登记的假设,即这种海马分化只在违规行为发生后的快速眼动睡眠(REM)中发生。参与者首先了解到一些项目可以预测其他项目(例如,A可以预测B),然后遇到了一个违规情况,即预测的项目(B)没有在预期中出现在与其相关的项目(A)之后;预测的项目随后出现在一个不相关的项目之后。然后,参与者被随机分配到三种情况中的一种:保持清醒,只进行非快速眼动睡眠的小睡,或者同时进行非快速眼动和快速眼动睡眠的小睡。虽然在预登记的左侧CA2/3/齿状回(DG) ROI中没有观察到预测结果,但我们在密切相关的海马ROI中确实观察到了支持我们假设的证据,未经多次比较校正:在右侧CA2/3/DG中,快速眼动睡眠组的分化大于非快速眼动睡眠组(清醒和非快速眼动睡眠);这种分化是特定项目的,集中在右侧DG。当预测项目在违反期间被更强烈地重新激活时,双侧DG的快速眼动相关分化效应也更大。总的来说,这些结果提供了初步证据,证明快速眼动睡眠与人类海马记忆表征的变化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信