Re-evaluating the association between thrombocytopenia and bleeding in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Albert Leng, Hannah Rando, Manuj Shah, Armaan Akbar, Benjamin Shou, Andrew Kalra, Sung-Min Cho, Glenn J R Whitman
{"title":"Re-evaluating the association between thrombocytopenia and bleeding in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).","authors":"Albert Leng, Hannah Rando, Manuj Shah, Armaan Akbar, Benjamin Shou, Andrew Kalra, Sung-Min Cho, Glenn J R Whitman","doi":"10.1177/02676591251364481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe platelet trigger at which to transfuse platelets to prevent bleeding complications in patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is unclear. We aimed to elucidate the association between platelet count and bleeding sequelae in this patient population.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study of all adult patients who received ECMO support from 2017 to 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups: \"non-thrombocytopenic\" (>30 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells /μL) versus \"thrombocytopenic\" (≤30 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells /μL). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between thrombocytopenia and bleeding complications; covariates were selected a priori. A post-hoc analysis investigating platelet transfusion status and nadir platelet count as an ordinal variable was also performed.ResultsOf 291 VV- and VA-ECMO patients, 69 (24%) were categorized as \"thrombocytopenic\" and 144 (50%) experienced at least one major bleeding event. Compared to \"non-thrombocytopenic\" patients, \"thrombocytopenic\" patients were more likely to be male (<i>p</i> = 0.049), to require veno-arterial central canulation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and to have been on dialysis (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Confounded by a 72% prophylactic transfusion rate, \"Thrombocytopenia\" was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (aOR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.31-1.10]). However, in patients with a nadir platelet count between 31 and 50 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/μL, the 63% with a prophylactic platelet transfusion had a significant reduction in major bleeding complications (<i>p</i> = 0.003).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that a platelet transfusion trigger of ≤50 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/μL is of benefit for prophylaxis against bleeding during ECMO support.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"2676591251364481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591251364481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe platelet trigger at which to transfuse platelets to prevent bleeding complications in patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is unclear. We aimed to elucidate the association between platelet count and bleeding sequelae in this patient population.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study of all adult patients who received ECMO support from 2017 to 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups: "non-thrombocytopenic" (>30 × 103 cells /μL) versus "thrombocytopenic" (≤30 × 103 cells /μL). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between thrombocytopenia and bleeding complications; covariates were selected a priori. A post-hoc analysis investigating platelet transfusion status and nadir platelet count as an ordinal variable was also performed.ResultsOf 291 VV- and VA-ECMO patients, 69 (24%) were categorized as "thrombocytopenic" and 144 (50%) experienced at least one major bleeding event. Compared to "non-thrombocytopenic" patients, "thrombocytopenic" patients were more likely to be male (p = 0.049), to require veno-arterial central canulation (p < 0.001), and to have been on dialysis (p < 0.001). Confounded by a 72% prophylactic transfusion rate, "Thrombocytopenia" was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (aOR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.31-1.10]). However, in patients with a nadir platelet count between 31 and 50 × 103 cells/μL, the 63% with a prophylactic platelet transfusion had a significant reduction in major bleeding complications (p = 0.003).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that a platelet transfusion trigger of ≤50 × 103 cells/μL is of benefit for prophylaxis against bleeding during ECMO support.

重新评估体外膜氧合(ECMO)中血小板减少与出血之间的关系。
目的体外膜氧合(ECMO)患者输注血小板以预防出血并发症的血小板触发点尚不清楚。我们的目的是阐明血小板计数与出血后遗症之间的关系。方法对2017年至2022年接受ECMO支持的所有成年患者进行单中心回顾性研究。患者被分为两组:“非血小板减少性”组(≤30 × 103细胞/μL)和“血小板减少性”组(≤30 × 103细胞/μL)。采用多变量logistic回归来确定血小板减少与出血并发症之间的关系;协变量是先验选择的。事后分析调查血小板输注状态和最低血小板计数作为一个顺序变量也进行了。结果在291例VV-和VA-ECMO患者中,69例(24%)被归类为“血小板减少”,144例(50%)经历了至少一次大出血事件。与“非血小板减少”患者相比,“血小板减少”患者更有可能是男性(p = 0.049),需要静脉-动脉中心插管(p < 0.001),并且进行过透析(p < 0.001)。由于72%的预防性输血率,“血小板减少”与大出血风险增加无关(aOR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.31-1.10])。然而,在血小板最低计数在31 - 50 × 103细胞/μL之间的患者中,63%的预防性血小板输注显著减少了主要出血并发症(p = 0.003)。结论血小板输注触发≤50 × 103细胞/μL有利于ECMO支持期间出血的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信