Predictive value of pre-reading skills and general language ability at 3;6 for pre-reading skills at 5;0 - a longitudinal comparison study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Marianna Visapää, Petriina Munck, Suvi Stolt
{"title":"Predictive value of pre-reading skills and general language ability at 3;6 for pre-reading skills at 5;0 - a longitudinal comparison study.","authors":"Marianna Visapää, Petriina Munck, Suvi Stolt","doi":"10.1080/02699206.2025.2537038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pre-reading skills (PreRS; rapid automatised naming RAN, letter knowledge LK, lexical ability and phonological processing PP) are precursory skills specific to reading, thus described as code-related. Early identification of weak PreRS is essential regarding their predictive value for reading performance. Stability of PreRS has been suggested from an early age, but information is needed regarding their associations with other linguistic skills. Further, comparison studies between code-related and general language factors are lacking. This longitudinal study compares predictive values of PreRS and general language ability at 3;6 for PreRS at 5;0. A classification based on one hereditary dyslexia risk factor (HDRF) and its associations with PreRS are tested. Participants comprised 66 healthy, monolingual Finnish-speaking children. At 3;6, RAN, LK, lexical ability and general language ability were measured using formal tests. HDRF was reported by parents. At 5;0, previous PreRS measures were repeated, and PP was measured. Significant correlations were detected between PreRS at 3;6 and 5;0 (r .30-.76). Associations between general language ability and later PreRS were comparable (r .29-.52). In the regression analysis, PreRS explained 45%, general language ability 37% and their combined model 49% of variation in later PreRS. The model with both code-related and general language predictors fitted the data best (AIC, BIC). Groups with no or at least one HDRF differed significantly in RAN at 5;0. The findings underline the developmentally stability of early PreRS and the good explanatory value of general language ability for PreRS just before school. Information on both components is recommended when designing pre-reading interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49219,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2025.2537038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pre-reading skills (PreRS; rapid automatised naming RAN, letter knowledge LK, lexical ability and phonological processing PP) are precursory skills specific to reading, thus described as code-related. Early identification of weak PreRS is essential regarding their predictive value for reading performance. Stability of PreRS has been suggested from an early age, but information is needed regarding their associations with other linguistic skills. Further, comparison studies between code-related and general language factors are lacking. This longitudinal study compares predictive values of PreRS and general language ability at 3;6 for PreRS at 5;0. A classification based on one hereditary dyslexia risk factor (HDRF) and its associations with PreRS are tested. Participants comprised 66 healthy, monolingual Finnish-speaking children. At 3;6, RAN, LK, lexical ability and general language ability were measured using formal tests. HDRF was reported by parents. At 5;0, previous PreRS measures were repeated, and PP was measured. Significant correlations were detected between PreRS at 3;6 and 5;0 (r .30-.76). Associations between general language ability and later PreRS were comparable (r .29-.52). In the regression analysis, PreRS explained 45%, general language ability 37% and their combined model 49% of variation in later PreRS. The model with both code-related and general language predictors fitted the data best (AIC, BIC). Groups with no or at least one HDRF differed significantly in RAN at 5;0. The findings underline the developmentally stability of early PreRS and the good explanatory value of general language ability for PreRS just before school. Information on both components is recommended when designing pre-reading interventions.

阅读前技能与一般语言能力的预测值为3;阅读前技能的预测值为6;阅读前技能的预测值为0 -纵向比较研究。
阅读前技能;快速自动命名RAN、字母知识LK、词汇能力和语音处理PP)是阅读特有的前兆技能,因此被描述为与代码相关的技能。早期识别弱pres对于其对阅读表现的预测价值至关重要。从早期就已经提出了PreRS的稳定性,但需要关于其与其他语言技能的联系的信息。此外,语码相关因素和一般语言因素之间的比较研究也很缺乏。这项纵向研究比较了PreRS和一般语言能力在3时的预测值,PreRS为5时的预测值为6,PreRS为0时的预测值。基于一种遗传性阅读障碍风险因素(HDRF)的分类及其与pres的关联进行了测试。参与者包括66名健康的单语芬兰语儿童。在3、6时,采用正式测试测量RAN、LK、词汇能力和一般语言能力。HDRF由家长报告。在5.0时,重复先前的PreRS测量,并测量PP。pres在3,6和5,0之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.30 - 0.76)。一般语言能力与后期pres之间的关联具有可比性(r = 0.29 - 0.52)。在回归分析中,PreRS解释了45%,一般语言能力解释了37%,他们的联合模型解释了49%的后期PreRS变异。具有代码相关和通用语言预测因子的模型最适合数据(AIC, BIC)。没有或至少有一个HDRF的组在5;0;研究结果强调了早期pre的发展稳定性,以及学龄前pre的一般语言能力的良好解释价值。在设计阅读前干预措施时,建议提供这两个部分的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics encompasses the following: Linguistics and phonetics of disorders of speech and language; Contribution of data from communication disorders to theories of speech production and perception; Research on communication disorders in multilingual populations, and in under-researched populations, and languages other than English; Pragmatic aspects of speech and language disorders; Clinical dialectology and sociolinguistics; Childhood, adolescent and adult disorders of communication; Linguistics and phonetics of hearing impairment, sign language and lip-reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信