The updated network meta-analysis of the therapeutic efficacies of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_264_24
Chuan-Hsin Chang, Chih-Cheng Chien, Yue-Cune Chang
{"title":"The updated network meta-analysis of the therapeutic efficacies of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chuan-Hsin Chang, Chih-Cheng Chien, Yue-Cune Chang","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_264_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. We aim to investigate the most effective treatments for advanced/nonadvanced stages of lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched electronic databases to investigate the treatment efficacies of lung cancer. The network meta-analysis was used to identify the top five most effective therapeutic strategies. A total of 157 studies were collected with a cumulative total of 164,678 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the best top five treatments: (1) for advanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemo + Chemotherapy + Targeted Therapy, Cell therapy + Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy + Radiotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy + Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 50.5, 49.6, 47.7, 46.0, and 45.6%; (2) for advanced lung cancer in progression-free survival (PFS) rate, were Targeted + Radiotherapy, Targeted + Others Therapy, Targeted + Targeted Therapy, Immu + Immu + Chemo Therapy, and Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 99.5, 82.8, 44.9, 36.5, and 33.6%; (3) for nonadvanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemoradiotherapy + Immu, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted therapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Others, Chemotherapy + Surgery, and Radiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 79.1, 74.9, 66.9, 60.4, and 54.2%; (4) for non-advanced lung cancer in PFS rate, were Chemo + Surgery, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted, Surgery, Surgery + Radiotherapy, and Chemoradiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 88.3, 86.1, 78.3, 73.1, and 50.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the latest and most effective therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced or nonadvanced stages of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"37 3","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_264_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. We aim to investigate the most effective treatments for advanced/nonadvanced stages of lung cancer patients.

Materials and methods: We searched electronic databases to investigate the treatment efficacies of lung cancer. The network meta-analysis was used to identify the top five most effective therapeutic strategies. A total of 157 studies were collected with a cumulative total of 164,678 participants.

Results: The results showed that the best top five treatments: (1) for advanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemo + Chemotherapy + Targeted Therapy, Cell therapy + Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy + Radiotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy + Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 50.5, 49.6, 47.7, 46.0, and 45.6%; (2) for advanced lung cancer in progression-free survival (PFS) rate, were Targeted + Radiotherapy, Targeted + Others Therapy, Targeted + Targeted Therapy, Immu + Immu + Chemo Therapy, and Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 99.5, 82.8, 44.9, 36.5, and 33.6%; (3) for nonadvanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemoradiotherapy + Immu, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted therapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Others, Chemotherapy + Surgery, and Radiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 79.1, 74.9, 66.9, 60.4, and 54.2%; (4) for non-advanced lung cancer in PFS rate, were Chemo + Surgery, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted, Surgery, Surgery + Radiotherapy, and Chemoradiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 88.3, 86.1, 78.3, 73.1, and 50.8%.

Conclusion: We present the latest and most effective therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced or nonadvanced stages of lung cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肺癌治疗效果的最新网络荟萃分析:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:肺癌是世界上最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。我们旨在探讨晚期/非晚期肺癌患者最有效的治疗方法。材料与方法:检索电子数据库,研究肺癌的治疗效果。网络荟萃分析用于确定前五种最有效的治疗策略。总共收集了157项研究,累计有164,678名参与者。结果:结果显示:(1)晚期肺癌有效率前5位的治疗方案分别为化疗+化疗+靶向治疗、细胞治疗+免疫治疗、靶向治疗+放疗、放化疗+免疫治疗、化疗+放化疗,累计概率分别为50.5、49.6、47.7、46.0、45.6%;(2)对于晚期肺癌的无进展生存(PFS)率,分别为靶向+放疗、靶向+其他治疗、靶向+靶向治疗、免疫+免疫+化疗和放化疗,累积概率分别为99.5%、82.8、44.9%、36.5和33.6%;(3)非晚期肺癌的有效率依次为放化疗+免疫、放化疗+靶向治疗、放化疗+其他、化疗+手术、放疗+其他,累计概率分别为79.1、74.9、66.9、60.4、54.2%;(4)非晚期肺癌的PFS率依次为化疗+手术、放化疗+靶向、手术、手术+放疗、放化疗+其他,累计概率分别为88.3、86.1、78.3、73.1、50.8%。结论:我们为晚期或非晚期肺癌患者提供了最新和最有效的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信