A Cross-Sectional comparison of proprioception, muscle strength, and athletic performance in adolescent athletes with and without dynamic balance deficits.
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional comparison of proprioception, muscle strength, and athletic performance in adolescent athletes with and without dynamic balance deficits.","authors":"Shaghayegh Shamsini Ghiyasvand, Farzaneh Saki, Farzaneh Ramezani","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-10369-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study compared ankle proprioception, isometric hip and ankle muscle strength, and athletic performance between adolescent athletes with and without dynamic balance deficits. The study involved 80 adolescent athletes (40 boys and 40 girls), with 40 participants exhibiting dynamic balance deficits and 40 with normal dynamic balance, based on the Y-Balance test. Proprioception was evaluated through ankle dorsiflexion reconstruction, muscle strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer, and athletic performance was assessed via the figure-of-eight hop test. The results revealed that athletes with dynamic balance deficits had greater angle reconstruction errors (P = 0.001), reduced hip extensor strength (P = 0.005), and lower ankle evertor strength (P = 0.013) compared to those with normal balance. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in hip abductor strength (P = 0.319), ankle invertor strength (P = 0.695), and athletic performance (P = 0.292). Adolescent athletes with dynamic balance deficits show impairments in ankle proprioception and in hip extensor and ankle evertor strength. Targeted neuromuscular training and early screening using the Y-Balance test may help address these deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"27803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12311027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10369-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This cross-sectional study compared ankle proprioception, isometric hip and ankle muscle strength, and athletic performance between adolescent athletes with and without dynamic balance deficits. The study involved 80 adolescent athletes (40 boys and 40 girls), with 40 participants exhibiting dynamic balance deficits and 40 with normal dynamic balance, based on the Y-Balance test. Proprioception was evaluated through ankle dorsiflexion reconstruction, muscle strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer, and athletic performance was assessed via the figure-of-eight hop test. The results revealed that athletes with dynamic balance deficits had greater angle reconstruction errors (P = 0.001), reduced hip extensor strength (P = 0.005), and lower ankle evertor strength (P = 0.013) compared to those with normal balance. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in hip abductor strength (P = 0.319), ankle invertor strength (P = 0.695), and athletic performance (P = 0.292). Adolescent athletes with dynamic balance deficits show impairments in ankle proprioception and in hip extensor and ankle evertor strength. Targeted neuromuscular training and early screening using the Y-Balance test may help address these deficits.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.