Fluoxetine in functional constipation with somatic symptom disorder - Efficacy and safety from a propensity score-matched cohort study.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bin Yang, Xiangying Feng, Qinxian Huang, Xuzhao Li, Xue Jiang, Weihong Fu, Qingchuan Zhao, Zhifeng Zhao
{"title":"Fluoxetine in functional constipation with somatic symptom disorder - Efficacy and safety from a propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Bin Yang, Xiangying Feng, Qinxian Huang, Xuzhao Li, Xue Jiang, Weihong Fu, Qingchuan Zhao, Zhifeng Zhao","doi":"10.17235/reed.2025.11434/2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Functional constipation (FC) is often accompanied by somatic symptom disorder (SSD), especially in refractory conditions. In such patients, constipation manifestations often appear to reflect heightened somatic symptoms rather than bowel dysfunction such as excessive preoccupation to defecation. We Therefore conducted a cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in patients with FC and comorbid SSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study involving 316 FC patients with somatic symptoms. Among them, 161 patients received fluoxetine, while 155 treated with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Using propensity scores, patients were matched into 77 pairs for comparative analysis. The primary outcome was proportion of achieving ≥ 3 completely spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week at six-month. Secondary outcomes included assessments of bowel symptom, mental Scale, treatment satisfaction. Safety was evaluated by adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At six months, 40.26% of fluoxetine group achieved primary endpoint compared to 22.08% in PEG group (P = 0.009). Significant improvements were noted in secondary outcomes, including frequency of CSBMs, bowel symptom severity, GAD-9 score, and patient satisfaction. Key factors contributing to treatment effectiveness included baseline GAD-9 scores > 9 (OR=5.01; P < 0.01). Adverse events occurred in 16 cases (9.9%) of the fluoxetine group, with most being mild life-affecting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoxetine appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option over a 6-month period for patients with FC and SSD, exerting dual benefits in alleviating both constipation and associated psychological symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2025.11434/2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Functional constipation (FC) is often accompanied by somatic symptom disorder (SSD), especially in refractory conditions. In such patients, constipation manifestations often appear to reflect heightened somatic symptoms rather than bowel dysfunction such as excessive preoccupation to defecation. We Therefore conducted a cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in patients with FC and comorbid SSD.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study involving 316 FC patients with somatic symptoms. Among them, 161 patients received fluoxetine, while 155 treated with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Using propensity scores, patients were matched into 77 pairs for comparative analysis. The primary outcome was proportion of achieving ≥ 3 completely spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week at six-month. Secondary outcomes included assessments of bowel symptom, mental Scale, treatment satisfaction. Safety was evaluated by adverse events.

Results: At six months, 40.26% of fluoxetine group achieved primary endpoint compared to 22.08% in PEG group (P = 0.009). Significant improvements were noted in secondary outcomes, including frequency of CSBMs, bowel symptom severity, GAD-9 score, and patient satisfaction. Key factors contributing to treatment effectiveness included baseline GAD-9 scores > 9 (OR=5.01; P < 0.01). Adverse events occurred in 16 cases (9.9%) of the fluoxetine group, with most being mild life-affecting.

Conclusion: Fluoxetine appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option over a 6-month period for patients with FC and SSD, exerting dual benefits in alleviating both constipation and associated psychological symptoms.

氟西汀治疗功能性便秘伴躯体症状障碍——来自倾向评分匹配队列研究的有效性和安全性。
简介:功能性便秘(FC)常伴有躯体症状障碍(SSD),特别是在难治性条件下。在这类患者中,便秘的表现往往反映了加重的躯体症状,而不是肠功能障碍,如过度专注于排便。因此,我们进行了一项队列研究,以评估氟西汀对FC合并SSD患者的疗效和安全性。方法:我们对316例有躯体症状的FC患者进行了队列研究。其中氟西汀组161例,聚乙二醇组155例。使用倾向评分,将患者分为77对进行比较分析。主要终点是在6个月时每周实现≥3次完全自发排便(CSBMs)的比例。次要结局包括肠症状评估、精神量表、治疗满意度。通过不良事件评价安全性。结果:6个月时,氟西汀组达到主要终点的比例为40.26%,PEG组为22.08% (P = 0.009)。次要结局显著改善,包括CSBMs发生频率、肠道症状严重程度、GAD-9评分和患者满意度。影响治疗效果的关键因素包括基线GAD-9评分bbbb9 (OR=5.01;P < 0.01)。氟西汀组发生不良事件16例(9.9%),多数为轻度影响生命。结论:氟西汀对FC和SSD患者来说是一种安全有效的治疗选择,在缓解便秘和相关心理症状方面具有双重益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
400
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信